Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Neglect Impairs Explicit Processing of the Mental Number Line

Converging evidence suggests that visuospatial attention plays a pivotal role in numerical processing, especially when the task involves the manipulation of numerical magnitudes. Visuospatial neglect impairs contralesional attentional orienting not only in perceptual but also in numerical space. Indeed, patients with left neglect show a bias toward larger numbers when mentally bisecting a numerical interval, as if they were neglecting its leftmost part. In contrast, their performance in parity judgments is unbiased, suggesting a dissociation between explicit and implicit processing of numerical magnitude. Here we further investigate the consequences of these visuospatial attention impairments on numerical processing and their interaction with task demands. Patients with right hemisphere damage, with and without left neglect, were administered both a number comparison and a parity judgment task that had identical stimuli and response requirements. Neglect patients’ performance was normal in the parity task, when processing of numerical magnitude was implicit, whereas they showed characteristic biases in the number comparison task, when access to numerical magnitude was explicit. Compared to patients without neglect, they showed an asymmetric distance effect, with slowing of the number immediately smaller than (i.e., to the left of) the reference and a stronger SNARC effect, particularly for large numbers. The latter might index an exaggerated effect of number-space compatibility after ipsilesional (i.e., rightward) orienting in number space. Thus, the effect of neglect on the explicit processing of numerical magnitude can be understood in terms of both a failure to orient to smaller (i.e., contralesional) magnitudes and a difficulty to disengage from larger (i.e., ipsilesional) magnitudes on the number line, which resembles the disrupted pattern of attention orienting in visual space.

[1]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  The influence of an external symbol system on number parity representation, or What’s odd about 6? , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  The Number Space and Neglect , 2004, Cortex.

[3]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task , 2009, Cognition.

[4]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  The mental number line modulates visual cortical excitability , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Explicit versus Implicit Processing of Representational Space in Neglect: Dissociations in Accessing the Mental Number Line , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Paying Attention through Eye Movements: A Computational Investigation of the Premotor Theory of Spatial Attention , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Modulation of hemispatial neglect by directional and numerical cues in the line bisection task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  D. Boisson,et al.  Does Action Make the Link Between Number and Space Representation? , 2004, Psychological science.

[12]  Carlo Umilta,et al.  Dissociation between Awareness and Spatial Coding: Evidence from Unilateral Neglect , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  C. Semenza,et al.  The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Interactions between perceptual and numerical space , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  W. Gevers,et al.  The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[16]  C. Semenza,et al.  Leftward motion restores number space in neglect , 2009, Cortex.

[17]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[18]  Wim Fias,et al.  Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[20]  Patrizia Bisiacchi,et al.  Esame Neuropsicologico Breve , 2003 .

[21]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic , 2006 .

[22]  Wim Fias,et al.  Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Anna Berti,et al.  Unconscious processing in neglect , 2002 .

[24]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Notational Modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (Linguistic Markedness of Response Codes) Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[27]  Paola Guariglia,et al.  Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[29]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Contribution of frontal cortex to the spatial representation of number , 2011, Cortex.

[30]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[31]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Lost in number space after right brain damage: A neural signature of representational neglect , 2008, Cortex.

[32]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[33]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[34]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Lucky numbers: Spatial neglect affects physical, but not representational, choices in a Lotto task , 2010, Cortex.

[35]  P. Pantano,et al.  Unilateral neglect restricted to visual imagery , 1993, Nature.

[36]  Silke M. Göbel,et al.  Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating ‘spatial’ neglect in healthy subjects , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  B. Anderson Spared awareness for the left side of internal visual images in patients with left‐sided extrapersonal neglect , 1993, Neurology.

[40]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[41]  T. Verguts,et al.  Beyond the mental number line: A neural network model of number–space interactions , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Michael E R Nicholls,et al.  Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[43]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Impairments of the mental number line for two-digit numbers in neglect , 2008, Cortex.

[44]  Wim Fias,et al.  Distinct representations of numerical and non-numerical order in the human intraparietal sulcus revealed by multivariate pattern recognition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[45]  R. Klein,et al.  A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[46]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  The Deployment of Visual Attention in the Intact Field of Hemineglect Patients , 1990, Cortex.

[47]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Challenging current accounts of unilateral neglect , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  W. Fias The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[49]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Random number generation in neglect patients reveals enhanced response stereotypy, but no neglect in number space , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Head turns bias the brain's internal random generator , 2008, Current Biology.

[51]  S. Cappa,et al.  The Mini-Mental State Examination in Alzheimer's Disease and Multi-Infarct Dementia , 1996, International Psychogeriatrics.

[52]  Wim Fias,et al.  How number is associated with space? The role of working memory. , 2011 .

[53]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[55]  Wim Fias,et al.  Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[56]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal responses. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[57]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[58]  Wim Fias,et al.  Non-spatial neglect for the mental number line , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Mark T. Waters,et al.  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourcearecredited.Thislicensedoesnot permit commercial exploitation or the creation of derivative works without sp , 2009 .

[60]  F Chain,et al.  Unilateral visual neglect and wave P 300. A study of nine cases with unilateral lesions of the parietal lobes. , 1985, Archives of neurology.

[61]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  The Mental Representation of Ordered Sequences in Visual Neglect , 2007, Cortex.

[62]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Neglect "around the clock": Dissociating number and spatial neglect in right brain damage , 2011 .

[63]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[64]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[65]  C. Umilta,et al.  Neuropsychology is nothing without control: A potential fallacy hidden in clinical studies , 2012, Cortex.

[66]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[67]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[69]  K. Priftis,et al.  Optokinetic Stimulation Modulates Neglect for the Number Space: Evidence from Mental Number Interval Bisection , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[70]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[71]  G. Orban,et al.  Processing of Abstract Ordinal Knowledge in the Horizontal Segment of the Intraparietal Sulcus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[73]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[74]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  The Cultural Number Line: A Review of Cultural and Linguistic Influences on the Development of Number Processing , 2011 .

[76]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[77]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  A simple measure of neglect severity , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[78]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.