Infection risk for primary and revision instrumented lumbar spine fusion in the Medicare population.

OBJECT This retrospective analysis of Medicare administrative data was performed to evaluate the risk of infection following instrumented lumbar fusion over a 10-year follow-up period in the Medicare population. Although infection can be a devastating complication, due to its rarity it is difficult to characterize infection risk except in large patient populations. METHODS Using ICD-9-CM and CPT4 procedure codes, the Medicare 5% analytical research files for inpatient, outpatient, and physician carrier claims were checked to identify patients who were treated between 1997 and 2009 with lumbar spine fusion in which cages or posterior instrumentation were used. Patients younger than 65 years old were excluded. Patients were followed continuously by using the matching denominator file until they withdrew from Medicare or died. The authors identified 15,069 patients with primary fusion procedures and 605 with revision of instrumented lumbar fusion. Infections were identified by the related ICD-9 codes (998.59 or 996.67) after fusion. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were performed to determine adjusted infection risk for each type of spine procedure (primary vs revision) and surgical approach (anterior, posterior, combined anteroposterior), accounting for patient (for example, age, sex, comorbidities/Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI], and state buy-in) and hospital (census region) characteristics. RESULTS At 10 years, the overall infection incidence, including superficial and deep infections, was 8.5% in primary procedures and 12.2% in revisions. Among the factors considered, infection risk within 10 years was most influenced by comorbidities: for a CCI of 5 versus 0, the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) was 2.48 (95% CI 1.93-3.19, p < 0.001); for ≥ 9 versus 2-3 fused vertebrae, the AHR was 2.39 (95% CI 1.20-4.76, p < 0.001); for revision versus primary fusion procedures, the AHR was 1.66 (95% CI 1.28-2.15, p < 0.001). Other significant predictors of 10-year infection risk included diagnosis of obesity (p < 0.001); state buy-in--a proxy for socioeconomic status (p = 0.02); age (p = 0.003); surgical approach (p = 0.03); census region (p = 0.02); and the year of the index procedure (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Patient comorbidities were the greatest predictor of infection risk for the Medicare population. The high incidence of infection following instrumented fusion warrants increased focus on infection risk mitigation, especially for patients with comorbid conditions.

[1]  F. Lolli,et al.  Late-developing infection following posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[2]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Rates of Infection After Spine Surgery Based on 108,419 Procedures: A Report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee , 2011, Spine.

[3]  Seong-Jang Kim,et al.  Implant Removal for the Management of Infection After Instrumented Spinal Fusion , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[4]  Chaim B. Colen,et al.  Safety of instrumentation in patients with spinal infection. , 2010, Journal of Neurosurgery : Spine.

[5]  J. Dettori,et al.  The Influence of Perioperative Risk Factors and Therapeutic Interventions on Infection Rates After Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2010, Spine.

[6]  D. B. Cohen,et al.  Incidence of surgical site infection following adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of patient risk , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[7]  Daniel Berry,et al.  Prosthetic Joint Infection Risk after TKA in the Medicare Population , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  D. B. Cohen,et al.  Incidence, Prevalence, and Analysis of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection Following Adult Spinal Surgery , 2009, Spine.

[10]  J. Fairbank,et al.  The diagnosis and management of infection following instrumented spinal fusion , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[11]  Joseph Duncan,et al.  Postoperative lumbar spine infection. , 2006, Orthopedics.

[12]  Serena S. Hu,et al.  Risk Factors for Infection After Spinal Surgery , 2005, Spine.

[13]  D. Schlenzka,et al.  Implant removal for late-developing infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis: reinstrumentation reduces loss of correction. A retrospective analysis of 45 cases , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[14]  M. Olsen,et al.  Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  F. Cammisa,et al.  Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[16]  H. Shufflebarger,et al.  Late-developing infection in instrumented idiopathic scoliosis. , 1999, Spine.

[17]  O. Karaeminoğullari,et al.  Postoperative deep wound infection in instrumented spinal surgery. , 1999, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[18]  S. Hodges,et al.  Low Postoperative Infection Rates With Instrumented Lumbar Fusion , 1998, Southern medical journal.

[19]  C. Wimmer,et al.  Predisposing factors for infection in spine surgery: a survey of 850 spinal procedures. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[20]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  Pseudarthrosis after postoperative wound infection in the lumbar spine. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[21]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  Jeffrey R. Desanto,et al.  Spine infection/inflammation. , 2011, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[23]  L. Lenke,et al.  Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  R. Deyo,et al.  ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY USE WITH ICD-g-CM ADMINISTRATIVE INDEX FOR DATABASES , 1992 .