Stochastic forcing of the linearized Navier–Stokes equations

Transient amplification of a particular set of favorably configured forcing functions in the stochastically driven Navier–Stokes equations linearized about a mean shear flow is shown to produce high levels of variance concentrated in a distinct set of response functions. The dominant forcing functions are found as solutions of a Lyapunov equation and the response functions are found as the distinct solutions of a related Lyapunov equation. Neither the forcing nor the response functions can be identified with the normal modes of the linearized dynamical operator. High variance levels are sustained in these systems under stochastic forcing, largely by transfer of energy from the mean flow to the perturbation field, despite the exponential stability of all normal modes of the system. From the perspective of modal analysis the explanation for this amplification of variance can be traced to the non‐normality of the linearized dynamical operator. The great amplification of perturbation variance found for Couett...

[1]  Brian F. Farrell,et al.  Optimal excitation of perturbations in viscous shear flow , 1988 .

[2]  Osborne Reynolds,et al.  XXIX. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels , 1883, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[3]  W. Heisenberg Über Stabilität und Turbulenz von Flüssigkeitsströmen , 1924 .

[4]  V. A. Krasil’nikov,et al.  Atmospheric turbulence and radio-wave propagation , 1962 .

[5]  W. Pfenninger BOUNDARY LAYER SUCTION EXPERIMENTS WITH LAMINAR FLOW AT HIGH REYNOLDS NUMBERS IN THE INLET LENGTH OF A TUBE BY VARIOUS SUCTION METHODS , 1961 .

[6]  Solomon Lefschetz,et al.  Differential Equations: Geometric Theory , 1958 .

[7]  O. Reynolds III. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels , 1883, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[8]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  A resonance mechanism in plane Couette flow , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  Hydrodynamic Stability Without Eigenvalues , 1993, Science.

[10]  Kathryn M. Butler,et al.  Three‐dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow , 1992 .

[11]  Kathryn M. Butler,et al.  Optimal perturbations and streak spacing in wall‐bounded turbulent shear flow , 1993 .

[12]  L. Gustavsson Energy growth of three-dimensional disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow , 1981, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Michel Loève,et al.  Probability Theory I , 1977 .

[14]  B. Farrell,et al.  Stochastic Forcing of Perturbation Variance in Unbounded Shear and Deformation Flows , 1993 .

[15]  P. Ioannou,et al.  Optimal excitation of three‐dimensional perturbations in viscous constant shear flow , 1993 .

[16]  M. Toda,et al.  In: Statistical physics II , 1985 .

[17]  S. C. Reddy,et al.  Energy growth in viscous channel flows , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Daniel D. Joseph,et al.  Stability of fluid motions , 1976 .

[19]  S. Orszag Accurate solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld stability equation , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  G. North Empirical Orthogonal Functions and Normal Modes , 1984 .

[21]  P. Ioannou,et al.  Perturbation growth in shear flow exhibits universality , 1993 .