Strongly coupled peridynamic and lattice Boltzmann models using immersed boundary method for flow-induced structural deformation and fracture

Abstract To simulate the dynamics of structural deformation and fracture caused by fluid-structure interactions accurately and efficiently, a strong coupling between the peridynamic model and the lattice Boltzmann method using the immersed boundary method is developed here. In this novel method, the peridynamic model predicts structural deformation and fracture, the cascaded lattice Boltzmann method serves as the flow solver, and the immersed boundary method is to enforce a no-slip boundary condition on the fluid-solid interface. The strong coupling is achieved by adding velocity corrections for the fluid and solid phases simultaneously at each time step, which are calculated by solving a linear system of equations derived from an implicit velocity correction immersed boundary scheme. Therefore, this new scheme based on the immersed boundary method eliminates the need to iteratively solve the dynamics of the fluid and solid phases at each time step. The proposed method is rigorously validated considering the plate with a pre-existing crack under velocity boundary conditions, the sedimentation of an elastic disk, the cross-flow over a flexible beam, and the flow-induced deformation of an elastic beam attached to a rigid cylinder. More importantly, the structural deformation, crack formation, and fracture due to interaction with the fluid flow are captured innovatively.

[1]  David Le Touzé,et al.  An efficient FSI coupling strategy between Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Finite Element methods , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[2]  C. Peskin.  Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart , 1977 .

[3]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  T. Inamuro,et al.  Effect of internal mass in the simulation of a moving body by the immersed boundary method , 2011 .

[5]  Stefano Ubertini,et al.  A partitioned approach for two-dimensional fluid–structure interaction problems by a coupled lattice Boltzmann-finite element method with immersed boundary , 2014 .

[6]  Hyung Jin Sung,et al.  Simulation of flexible filaments in a uniform flow by the immersed boundary method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  Guang Pan,et al.  ICCM2016: The Implementation of Two-Dimensional Multi-Block Lattice Boltzmann Method on GPU , 2017, International Journal of Computational Methods.

[8]  F. Tian,et al.  Numerical study of flexible flapping wings with an immersed boundary method: Fluid–structure–acoustics interaction , 2019, Journal of Fluids and Structures.

[9]  Luoding Zhu,et al.  An efficient immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for the hydrodynamic interaction of elastic filaments , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  A peridynamics formulation for quasi-static fracture and contact in rock , 2017 .

[11]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Immersed Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction. , 2020, Annual review of fluid mechanics.

[12]  R. Mittal,et al.  Benchmarking a Coupled Immersed-Boundary-Finite-Element Solver for Large-Scale Flow-Induced Deformation , 2012 .

[13]  E. Rank,et al.  Fixed‐grid fluid–structure interaction in two dimensions based on a partitioned Lattice Boltzmann and p‐FEM approach , 2009 .

[14]  Sanjoy Banerjee,et al.  Incorporating forcing terms in cascaded lattice Boltzmann approach by method of central moments. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Sina Haeri,et al.  A new implicit fictitious domain method for the simulation of flow in complex geometries with heat transfer , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  S. Silling,et al.  A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics , 2005 .

[17]  Selda Oterkus,et al.  Ordinary state-based peridynamics for plastic deformation according to von Mises yield criteria with isotropic hardening , 2016 .

[18]  S. Silling,et al.  Peridynamic modeling of membranes and fibers , 2004 .

[19]  Jung-Wuk Hong,et al.  Discretized peridynamics for brittle and ductile solids , 2012 .

[20]  Nicolas Favrie,et al.  Multi-solid and multi-fluid diffuse interface model: Applications to dynamic fracture and fragmentation , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  Julian J. Rimoli,et al.  An approach for incorporating classical continuum damage models in state-based peridynamics , 2013 .

[22]  J. Lai,et al.  An immersed boundary method for fluid–structure–acoustics interactions involving large deformations and complex geometries , 2019, 1905.00182.

[23]  Guang Pan,et al.  A relaxed multi-direct-forcing immersed boundary-cascaded lattice Boltzmann method accelerated on GPU , 2020, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[24]  Jeffrey Xu Yu,et al.  A hybrid immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann/finite difference method for coupled dynamics of fluid flow, advection, diffusion and adsorption in fractured and porous media , 2018, Comput. Geosci..

[25]  J. Wu,et al.  Implicit velocity correction-based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method and its applications , 2009 .

[26]  K. Luo,et al.  Cascaded lattice Boltzmann method with improved forcing scheme for large-density-ratio multiphase flow at high Reynolds and Weber numbers. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[27]  Tim Colonius,et al.  A strongly-coupled immersed-boundary formulation for thin elastic structures , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[28]  J. Clausen,et al.  Simulating deformable particle suspensions using a coupled lattice-Boltzmann and finite-element method , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  J. Korvink,et al.  Cascaded digital lattice Boltzmann automata for high Reynolds number flow. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Guanfeng Zhang,et al.  Why do cracks branch? A peridynamic investigation of dynamic brittle fracture , 2015, International Journal of Fracture.

[31]  K. Luo,et al.  Modeling incompressible thermal flows using a central-moments-based lattice Boltzmann method , 2017, 1710.10569.

[32]  Ya Zhang,et al.  Numerical study of the particle sedimentation in a viscous fluid using a coupled DEM-IB-CLBM approach , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[33]  Toshiaki Hisada,et al.  Studies of the strong coupling and weak coupling methods in FSI analysis , 2004 .

[34]  F. Dalla Barba,et al.  A Novel Approach for Direct Numerical Simulation of Hydraulic Fracture Problems , 2020 .

[35]  G. R. Liu,et al.  An Eulerian-Lagrangian-Lagrangian method for solving fluid-structure interaction problems with bulk solids , 2020, J. Comput. Phys..

[36]  Dierk Raabe,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Computers and Mathematics with Applications , 2022 .

[37]  Wen-Quan Wang,et al.  A simple and efficient implicit direct forcing immersed boundary model for simulations of complex flow , 2017 .

[38]  Fang-Bao Tian,et al.  An immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-structure interaction problems involving viscoelastic fluids and complex geometries , 2020, J. Comput. Phys..

[39]  Y. Qian,et al.  Lattice BGK Models for Navier-Stokes Equation , 1992 .

[40]  Dongke Sun,et al.  Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic focusing of particles in straight channel flows with the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method , 2015 .

[41]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Fracture of graphene: a review , 2015, International Journal of Fracture.

[42]  S. Silling,et al.  Peridynamic States and Constitutive Modeling , 2007 .

[43]  Kunihiko Taira,et al.  A stable fluid-structure-interaction solver for low-density rigid bodies using the immersed boundary projection method , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[44]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Immersed smoothed finite element method for two dimensional fluid–structure interaction problems , 2012 .

[45]  S. Haeri,et al.  Fully resolved simulation of particle deposition and heat transfer in a differentially heated cavity , 2014 .

[46]  Zhe Li,et al.  A non-staggered coupling of finite element and lattice Boltzmann methods via an immersed boundary scheme for fluid-structure interaction , 2017 .

[47]  H. Sung,et al.  An immersed boundary method for fluid–flexible structure interaction , 2009 .

[48]  Pankaj P. Gohil,et al.  Coalesced effect of cavitation and silt erosion in hydro turbines—A review , 2014 .

[49]  Chengjie Wang,et al.  Strongly coupled dynamics of fluids and rigid-body systems with the immersed boundary projection method , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[50]  Z. Feng,et al.  Robust treatment of no-slip boundary condition and velocity updating for the lattice-Boltzmann simulation of particulate flows , 2009 .

[51]  Ignazio Maria Viola,et al.  PROTEUS: A coupled iterative force-correction immersed-boundary cascaded lattice Boltzmann solver for moving and deformable boundary applications , 2017, Comput. Math. Appl..

[52]  Stewart Andrew Silling,et al.  Peridynamic Modeling of Impact Damage , 2004 .

[53]  Weixi Huang,et al.  Recent trends and progress in the immersed boundary method , 2019, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science.

[55]  F. Sotiropoulos,et al.  Immersed boundary methods for simulating fluid-structure interaction , 2014 .

[56]  John S. Shrimpton,et al.  On the application of immersed boundary, fictitious domain and body-conformal mesh methods to many particle multiphase flows , 2012 .

[57]  M. Barigou,et al.  Deformation and rupture of compound cells under shear: A discrete multiphysics study , 2019, Physics of Fluids.

[58]  Chaoyang Sun,et al.  Peridynamic simulation to impacting damage in composite laminate , 2016 .

[59]  S. Turek,et al.  Proposal for Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction between an Elastic Object and Laminar Incompressible Flow , 2006 .

[60]  Ya Zhang,et al.  A multi-physics peridynamics-DEM-IB-CLBM framework for the prediction of erosive impact of solid particles in viscous fluids , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.