Prediction of Residual Stroke Risk in Anticoagulated Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: mCARS

Our ability to evaluate residual stroke risk despite anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently lacking. The Calculator of Absolute Stroke Risk (CARS) has been proposed to predict 1-year absolute stroke risk in non-anticoagulated patients. We aimed to determine whether a modified CARS (mCARS) may be used to assess the residual stroke risk in anticoagulated AF patients from ‘real-world’ and ‘clinical trial’ cohorts. We studied patient-level data of anticoagulated AF patients from the real-world Murcia AF Project and AMADEUS clinical trial. Individual mCARS were estimated for each patient. None of the patients were treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. The predicted residual stroke risk was compared to actual stroke risk. 3503 patients were included (2205 [62.9%] clinical trial and 1298 [37.1%] real-world). There was wide variation of CARS for each category of CHA2DS2-VASc score in both cohorts. Average predicted residual stroke risk by mCARS (1.8 ± 1.8%) was identical to actual stroke risk (1.8% [95% CI, 1.3–2.4]) in the clinical trial, and broadly similar in the real-world (2.1 ± 1.9% vs. 2.4% [95% CI, 1.6–3.4]). AUCs of mCARS for prediction of stroke events in the clinical trial and real-world were 0.678 (95% CI, 0.598–0.758) and 0.712 [95% CI, 0.618–0.805], respectively. mCARS was able to refine stroke risk estimation for each point of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in both cohorts. Personalised residual 1-year absolute stroke risk in anticoagulated AF patients may be estimated using mCARS, thereby allowing an assessment of the absolute risk reduction of treatment and facilitating a patient-centred approach in the management of AF. Such identification of patients with high residual stroke risk could help target more aggressive interventions and follow-up.

[1]  J. Uhm,et al.  Atrial fibrillation and the risk of ischaemic strokes or intracranial haemorrhages: comparisons of the catheter ablation, medical therapy, and non-atrial fibrillation population. , 2020, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  G. Boriani,et al.  Relation of outcomes to ABC (Atrial Fibrillation Better Care) pathway adherent care in European patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis from the ESC-EHRA EORP Atrial Fibrillation General Long-Term (AFGen LT) Registry. , 2020, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  P. Ellinor,et al.  Assessing absolute stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation using a risk factor based approach. , 2020, European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy.

[4]  G. Lip,et al.  Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessments in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Concepts and Controversies , 2020, Frontiers in Medicine.

[5]  A. Freeman How to communicate evidence to patients , 2019, Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin.

[6]  T. Chao,et al.  Age threshold for the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights into the optimal assessment of age and incident comorbidities. , 2019, European heart journal.

[7]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial , 2019, JAMA.

[8]  T. Chao,et al.  Incident Co-Morbidities in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Initially with a CHA2DS2-VASc Score of 0 (Males) or 1 (Females): Implications for Reassessment of Stroke Risk in Initially ‘Low-Risk’ Patients , 2019, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[9]  G. Lip,et al.  A Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Taking Vitamin K Antagonists: Comparing the “Real‐World” vs Clinical Trials , 2018, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[10]  E. Amsterdam,et al.  CAABL-AF (California Study of Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation): Mortality and Stroke, 2005 to 2013 , 2018, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[11]  E. Heist,et al.  Stroke and Cardiovascular Events After Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. , 2018, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  Outcome of left atrial appendage occlusion in high-risk patients , 2017, Heart.

[13]  R. Sander Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2017, Nursing older people.

[14]  N. Gronich,et al.  Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with reduced risk of stroke and mortality: A propensity score-matched analysis. , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[15]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  [2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS]. , 2016, Kardiologia polska.

[16]  B. Freedman,et al.  Residual Risk of Stroke and Death in Anticoagulant-Treated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[17]  C. Murray,et al.  Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation: A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study , 2014, Circulation.

[18]  E. Antman,et al.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. O'Neill,et al.  Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in heart failure. , 2013, Heart failure clinics.

[20]  G. Lip,et al.  Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report , 2012, Chest.

[21]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Chest.

[22]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  S. Lévy,et al.  Comparison of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[24]  M. Aguilar,et al.  Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Stroke in Patients Who Have Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  Simon Stewart,et al.  A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[26]  M. Rich,et al.  Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. , 2001, JAMA.

[27]  Martha J. Radford,et al.  Validation of Clinical Classification Schemes for Predicting Stroke: Results From the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation , 2001 .

[28]  Lawrence Blonde,et al.  Case Presentation , 2000, Techniques in Neurosurgery.

[29]  D. Levy,et al.  Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. , 1998, Circulation.

[30]  D. Xavier,et al.  Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation , 2012 .

[31]  R. Troughton,et al.  Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.