Local knowledge and learning in an urban planning and design context can be examined as both informal and formal spatial information, which is created and shared in a local mapping forum. The problem is that these two types of information seldom can be merged and viewed together. I will start my study by defining the concept of local knowledge. Essential questions are as following: Can informal information produced by local actors be utilized alongside with formal institutionally produced information? Do new Internet technologies enable more effective ways for knowledge building and learning in a planning process? I present the results of an experiment which was realized in a city quarter of Maunula in Helsinki, Finland, in 2003-2004. An Internet-based mapping application, My Maunula Map, was integrated into the city quarter’s web site. Based on these experiments, a new community mapping application will be built in Espoo in cooperation with the residents ́ associations, researchers (OPUS project) and the municipality. Development Forum of Espoon keskus will be a local web site with diverse information providers.
[1]
P. Healey.
Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies
,
1997
.
[2]
Nigel Taylor,et al.
Urban Planning Theory Since 1945
,
1998
.
[3]
M. Haklay.
Community participation and geographic information systems
,
2003
.
[4]
MISSING-VALUE MISSING-VALUE,et al.
Knowledge Building
,
2017
.
[5]
Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.
Рациональность и Власть (Rationality and Power)
,
1998
.
[6]
Michael K. McCall,et al.
Seeking good governance in participatory-GIS: a review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning
,
2003
.
[7]
Tore Sager,et al.
The rationality issue in land‐use planning
,
1999
.
[8]
Daniel Weiner,et al.
Community participation and geographic information systems.
,
2002
.