Optimal price design for variable capacity outsourcing contracts

Outsourcing of information technology (IT) infrastructure and business processes (BP) is a significant aspect of the business landscape. Recently, attention has moved to variable capacity contracts linked to business or IT metrics for medium to long term (two to ten year) deals. This new emphasis on variability is accompanied by a growth in interest in the accompanying pricing schemes. A basic tension in the design of these pricing schemes occurs between the objectives of the outsourcing provider (hereafter Provider) and the company whose IT or BP is being outsourced (hereafter Client). In other words, their utility functions on contract attributes differ. For example, the Client may desire utility-style pricing, while the Provider may be interested in the certainty with which it achieves a given margin. This paper characterises and solves the price design problem (PDP) for variable capacity IT/BP outsourcing contracts within a descriptive multi-attribute utility theory framework from the point of view of the bid team, ie they know costs and must negotiate prices. In these situations, costs are usually granular, non-linear and history dependent. It is shown that the PDP, ie the general problem of choosing a price structure to optimise the joint utility function of the Provider and of the Client for arbitrary cost functions, can be formulated exactly as a stochastic program. The formulation imposes no restrictions on the form of the price functions a priori. A solution method is introduced based on decomposition of the event space (where events are, for example, Client requirement histories) using a basis of linear functionals. The resulting linear (and quadratic) mixed integer optimisations can be solved numerically using standard software. The solution yields Pareto-efficient outcomes with respect to the Provider and the Client. The frontier of Pareto-optimal designs serves as an appropriate space for practical contract negotiation.

[1]  Yuan Xu,et al.  Orthogonal Polynomials of Several Variables , 2014, 1701.02709.

[2]  M. Abdellaoui Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions , 2000 .

[3]  Nicholas G. Carr,et al.  Does IT Matter? Information Technology and the Corrosion of Competitive Advantage , 2004 .

[4]  G. Maddala,et al.  Unit roots, cointegration, and structural change , 1998 .

[5]  Alan H. Karp,et al.  Representing Utility for Automated Negotiation , 2003 .

[6]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Quantity Flexibility Contracts: Optimal Decisions with Information Updates , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[7]  S. Nahmias,et al.  Modeling Supply Chain Contracts: A Review , 1999 .

[8]  Wedad Elmaghraby,et al.  Supply Contract Competition and Sourcing Policies , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[9]  Hiroyuki Okamuro,et al.  Risk sharing in the supplier relationship: new evidence from the Japanese automotive industry , 2001 .

[10]  Michael J. Fry,et al.  Focused Issue: The Use of Information in Managing Supply Chains, Part 2 of 2: Coordinating Production and Delivery Under a (z, Z)-Type Vendor-Managed Inventory Contract , 2001, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[11]  Frank Riedel,et al.  Dynamic Coherent Risk Measures , 2003 .

[12]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Competition and Outsourcing with Scale Economies , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Edieal J. Pinker,et al.  Contingent Labor Contracting Under Demand and Supply Uncertainty , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Jeffrey I. McGill,et al.  Revenue Management: Research Overview and Prospects , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[15]  A. Balakrishnan Applied Functional Analysis , 1976 .

[16]  John C. Butler,et al.  A Multiattribute Utility Analysis of Alternatives for the Disposition of Surplus Weapons-Grade Plutonium , 1998, Oper. Res..

[17]  M. Avellaneda,et al.  Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain volatilities , 1995 .

[18]  Giuseppe A. Paleologo Price-at-Risk: A methodology for pricing utility computing services , 2004, IBM Syst. J..

[19]  Pinar Keskinocak,et al.  Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: research overview, current practices, and future directions , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[20]  Apostolos Burnetas,et al.  Adaptive Ordering and Pricing for Perishable Products , 2000, Oper. Res..

[21]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[22]  Vipul Agrawal,et al.  Impact of Uncertainty and Risk Aversion on Price and Order Quantity in the Newsvendor Problem , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[23]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Siting energy facilities , 1980 .

[24]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  Capacity Investments in Supply Chains: Sharing the Gain Rather Than Sharing the Pain , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[25]  Alper Atamtürk,et al.  Capacity Acquisition, Subcontracting, and Lot Sizing , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Chung-lun Li,et al.  Flexible and Risk-Sharing Supply Contracts Under Price Uncertainty , 1999 .

[27]  Robert M. Fuhrer,et al.  Coordinating Investment, Production, and Subcontracting , 1999 .

[28]  Ale Smidts,et al.  The Shape of Utility Functions and Organizational Behavior , 2002, Manag. Sci..