Radial bias in face identification

Human vision in the periphery is most accurate for stimuli that point towards the fovea. This so-called radial bias has been linked with the organization and spatial selectivity of neurons at the lowest levels of the visual system, from retinal ganglion cells onwards. Despite evidence that the human visual system is radially biased, it is not yet known whether this bias persists at higher levels of processing, or whether high-level representations are invariant to this low-level orientation bias. We used the case of face identity recognition to address this question. The specialized high-level mechanisms that support efficient face recognition are highly dependent on horizontally oriented information, which convey the most useful identity cues in the fovea. We show that face selective mechanisms are more sensitive on the horizontal meridian (to the left and right of fixation) compared to the vertical meridian (above and below fixation), suggesting that the horizontal cues in the face are better extracted on the horizontal meridian, where they align with the radial bias. The results demonstrate that the radial bias is maintained at high-level recognition stages and emphasize the importance of accounting for the radial bias in future investigation of visual recognition processes in peripheral vision.

[1]  D. Whitney,et al.  Relative tuning of holistic face processing towards the fovea , 2022, Vision Research.

[2]  Xiangmin Xu,et al.  Beyond t test and ANOVA: applications of mixed-effects models for more rigorous statistical analysis in neuroscience research , 2021, Neuron.

[3]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Holistic face recognition is an emergent phenomenon of spatial processing in face-selective regions , 2021, Nature Communications.

[4]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Differential spatial computations in ventral and lateral face-selective regions are scaffolded by structural connections , 2021, Nature Communications.

[5]  Jan W. Kurzawski,et al.  An enhanced Bouma model fits a hundred people’s visual crowding , 2021 .

[6]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Population Receptive Field Shapes in Early Visual Cortex Are Nearly Circular , 2020, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Stimulus-dependent contrast sensitivity asymmetries around the visual field , 2020, bioRxiv.

[8]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Asymmetries in visual acuity around the visual field , 2020, Journal of vision.

[9]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Contrast versus identity encoding in the face image follow distinct orientation selectivity profiles , 2020, PloS one.

[10]  Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld,et al.  Modulating the global orientation bias of the visual system changes population receptive field elongations , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Philipp Berens,et al.  Understanding the retinal basis of vision across species , 2019, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Sherryse L. Corrow,et al.  Looking beyond the face area: lesion network mapping of prosopagnosia. , 2019, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Justin Duncan,et al.  Revisiting the link between horizontal tuning and face processing ability with independent measures. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Sanne ten Oever,et al.  Coarse-to-fine information integration in human vision , 2019, NeuroImage.

[15]  Valérie Goffaux,et al.  Fixed or flexible? Orientation preference in identity and gaze processing in humans , 2019, PloS one.

[16]  N. Guyader,et al.  Face perception influences the programming of eye movements , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Charles E. Davis,et al.  Zapping 500 faces in less than 100 seconds: Evidence for extremely fast and sustained continuous visual search , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar,et al.  Eccentricity dependence of orientation anisotropy of surround suppression of contrast-detection threshold. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[19]  Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld,et al.  Spatial elongation of population receptive field profiles revealed by model‐free fMRI back‐projection , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Differential Sampling of Visual Space in Ventral and Dorsal Early Visual Cortex , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Allison B Sekuler,et al.  The Bandwidth of Diagnostic Horizontal Structure for Face Identification , 2018, Perception.

[22]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[23]  Steven G. Luke,et al.  Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[24]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model Comparison Approach To Regression, ANOVA, and Beyond, Third Edition , 2017 .

[25]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Variations in crowding, saccadic precision, and spatial localization reveal the shared topology of spatial vision , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  Do low spatial frequencies explain the extremely fast saccades towards human faces? , 2017, Vision Research.

[27]  Tomoyasu Horikawa,et al.  Position Information Encoded by Population Activity in Hierarchical Visual Areas , 2017, eNeuro.

[28]  G. Kovács,et al.  Face inversion reveals holistic processing of peripheral faces , 2017, Cortex.

[29]  John A. Greenwood,et al.  The orientation selectivity of face identification , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[30]  A. Barbot,et al.  Optical and neural anisotropy in peripheral vision , 2016, Journal of vision.

[31]  R. Rosén,et al.  Choice of Grating Orientation for Evaluation of Peripheral Vision , 2016, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Horizontal tuning for faces originates in high-level Fusiform Face Area , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Valérie Goffaux,et al.  Selectivity of Face Perception to Horizontal Information over Lifespan (from 6 to 74 Year Old) , 2015, PloS one.

[34]  Jelle A. van Dijk,et al.  Cortical idiosyncrasies predict the perception of object size , 2015, Nature Communications.

[35]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[36]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Face perception is tuned to horizontal orientation in the N170 time window. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[37]  D. Samuel Schwarzkopf,et al.  Subjective Size Perception Depends on Central Visual Cortical Magnification in Human V1 , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  Alessandro Moscatelli,et al.  Modeling psychophysical data at the population-level: the generalized linear mixed model. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[39]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Sensitivity to Information Conveyed by Horizontal Contours is Correlated with Face Identification Accuracy , 2012, Front. Psychol..

[40]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  An objective method for measuring face detection thresholds using the sweep steady-state visual evoked response. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[41]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[42]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.

[43]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[44]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Horizontal Information Drives the Behavioral Signatures of Face Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[45]  Sébastien M. Crouzet,et al.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[46]  David Whitney,et al.  Holistic crowding of Mooney faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[47]  R. Watt,et al.  Biological "bar codes" in human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[48]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  J. Barton Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[50]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-Variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[51]  Wim Vanduffel,et al.  The Radial Bias: A Different Slant on Visual Orientation Sensitivity in Human and Nonhuman Primates , 2006, Neuron.

[52]  S. McKee,et al.  The effect of spatial configuration on surround suppression of contrast sensitivity. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[53]  David Whitaker,et al.  A psychophysical investigation of ocular expansion in human eyes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[54]  I. Pigarev,et al.  Distant cortical locations of the upper and lower quadrants of the visual field represented by neurons with elongated and radially oriented receptive fields , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  The distribution of preferred orientations in the peripheral visual field , 2003, Vision Research.

[56]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Neurons with radial receptive fields in monkey area V4A: evidence of a subdivision of prelunate gyrus based on neuronal response properties , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  J M Zanker,et al.  Detecting the orientation of short lines in the periphery. , 1998, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[59]  I. Pigarev,et al.  Two visual areas located in the middle suprasylvian gyrus (cytoarchitectonic field 7) of the cat's cortex , 1998, Neuroscience.

[60]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[61]  Nicoletta Berardi,et al.  Visual field asymmetries in pattern discrimination: A sign of asymmetry in cortical visual field representation? , 1991, Vision Research.

[62]  M. Banks,et al.  The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[63]  Y. Chino,et al.  Orientation bias of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[64]  D M Levi,et al.  Peripheral hyperacuity: isoeccentric bisection is better than radial bisection. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[65]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell dendritic fields in old-world monkeys are oriented radially , 1986, Brain Research.

[66]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Relationship between preferred orientation and receptive field position of neurons in extrastriate cortex (area 19) in the cat , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[67]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Structural basis of orientation sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[68]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Relationship between preferred orientation and receptive field position of neurons in cat striate cortex , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[69]  J Rovamo,et al.  Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in peripheral vision. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[70]  Muriel Boucart,et al.  Finding faces, animals, and vehicles in far peripheral vision. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[71]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: The extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry , 2012, Vision Research.

[72]  Y. Zhou,et al.  The orientation bias of LGN neurons shows topographic relation to area centralis in the cat retina , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  E. McKone,et al.  Isolating the special component of face recognition: peripheral identification and a Mooney face. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[75]  O. Koenig,et al.  Separable Mechanisms in Face Processing: Evidence from Hemispheric Specialization , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.