Physics-based Surrogate Optimization of Francis Turbine Runner Blades, Using Mesh Adaptive Direct Search and Evolutionary Algorithms

A robust multi-fidelity optimization methodology has been developed, focusing on efficiently handling industrial runner design of hydraulic Francis turbines. The computational task is split between low- and high-fidelity phases in order to properly balance the CFD cost and required accuracy in different design stages. In the low-fidelity phase, a physics-based surrogate optimization loop manages a large number of iterative optimization evaluations. Two derivative-free optimization methods use an inviscid flow solver as a physics-based surrogate to obtain the main characteristics of a good design in a relatively fast iterative process. The case study of a runner design for a low-head Francis turbine indicates advantages of integrating two derivative-free optimization algorithms with different local- and global search capabilities.

[1]  François Guibault,et al.  Multi-fidelity design optimization of Francis turbine runner blades , 2014 .

[2]  Christophe Devals,et al.  Steady and unsteady flow computation in an elbow draft tube with experimental validation , 2011 .

[3]  B Nennemann,et al.  Flow simulation for a propeller turbine with different runner blade geometries , 2012 .

[4]  P. Grafenberger,et al.  Constrained Multi-Objective Design Optimization of Hydraulic Components Using a Hierarchical Metamodel Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm . Part 1 : Theory , 2009 .

[5]  Christophe Devals,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization of Runner Blades Using a Multi-Fidelity Algorithm , 2013 .

[6]  Charles Audet,et al.  OrthoMADS: A Deterministic MADS Instance with Orthogonal Directions , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[7]  Sébastien Le Digabel,et al.  Algorithm xxx : NOMAD : Nonlinear Optimization with the MADS algorithm , 2010 .

[8]  Charles Audet,et al.  Nonsmooth optimization through Mesh Adaptive Direct Search and Variable Neighborhood Search , 2006, J. Glob. Optim..

[9]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Variable-Fidelity Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2011, Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms.

[10]  Theresa Dawn Robinson,et al.  Surrogate-Based Optimization Using Multifidelity Models with Variable Parameterization and Corrected Space Mapping , 2008 .

[11]  José Manuel Franco-Nava,et al.  CFD Performance Evaluation and Runner Blades Design Optimization in a Francis Turbine , 2009 .

[12]  J McNabb,et al.  CFD based draft tube hydraulic design optimization , 2014 .

[13]  A. V. Semenova,et al.  Multiobjective optimal design of runner blade using efficiency and draft tube pulsation criteria , 2012 .

[14]  Gabriel Dan Ciocan,et al.  Experimental analysis of the swirling flow in a Francis turbine draft tube: Focus on radial velocity component determination , 2010 .

[15]  Luca Mangani,et al.  Evolutionary algorithm based optimization of hydraulic machines utilizing a state-of-the-art block coupled CFD solver and parametric geometry and mesh generation tools , 2014 .

[16]  Sven Leyffer,et al.  Nonlinear programming without a penalty function , 2002, Math. Program..

[17]  Christophe Tribes,et al.  Multi-fidelity shape optimization of hydraulic turbine runner blades using a multi-objective mesh adaptive direct search algorithm , 2016 .

[18]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Optimization with variable-fidelity models applied to wing design , 1999 .

[19]  Romeo SUSAN-RESIGA,et al.  Axisymmetric Swirling Flow Simulation of the Draft Tube Vortex in Francis Turbines at Partial Discharge , 2009 .

[20]  Nemat Kasaeian,et al.  Optimal design of axial hydro turbine for micro hydropower plants , 2012 .