Effects of A Peer Assessment System based on a Grid-based Knowledge Classification Approach on Computer Skills Training

Introduction Presently, most vocational students have significant experience using computers, and endeavor to pass the certification of the office word processing software application in their first year of senior vocational school in Taiwan. The skill evaluation center of the workforce development agency of the Council of Labor Affairs (i.e., CLA) conducts such testing. San et al. (2006) indicated that the licensing rate is an important index for measuring labor quality; moreover, those who pass the licensing tests are deemed to be more professionally qualified and competitive in the labor market (San et al., 2006). There is no implementation subject which every vocational school student has to learn besides the certification of computer software application, because fostering such competence is one of the essential employability skills in the workplace. In other words, there is a particular population with an urgent need to learn this topic. The certification includes two stages. The first assesses the students' academic knowledge, while the second assesses their practical computing skills with real tasks which must be completed within two hours using the functions of the application software for managing, editing, and positioning the required fonts, tables, paragraphs, format styles, word art, visual material, columns, and layout size. After passing both the academic and practical tasks, CLA will certify the students. Knowing how to operate software does not necessarily mean one can correctly use it for practical applications. Learning to apply the available information and software to solve problems is vital for vocational high school students (Valtonen, Hacklin, Dillon, Vesisenaho, Kukkonen, & Hietanen, 2012; Chang, Tseng, & Lou, 2012). Scholars have noted that vocational students have relatively low academic achievement and less positive attitudes toward learning, resulting in a lack of higher-order thinking (Lee, Shen, & Tsai, 2010; Yang, 2015). Yang (2015) warned that low engagement and outdated approaches to instruction are the two main challenges of vocational education. Repeated operation without supporting students' thinking may result in a lack of problem- solving capability in the workplace (Yang, 2015). Therefore, it is necessary to provide these students with higher-order thinking learning activities. Simply learning a software's functionality in class does not elicit the students' full potential because they may not be able to correctly apply, analyze or evaluate the functions they have learned to solve the problems or complete the tasks they have been assigned. To deal with this phenomenon, this study considers a peer assessment approach which lets the students learn not only from the teacher's lessons but also by finding their peers' implementation errors (Race, 2001; Hsia, Huang, & Hwang, 2015). Peer assessment is one of the higher-order thinking learning activities (Lorente-Catalan & Kirk, 2016). Moreover, performing the active role of a reviewer can have a positive impact on one's own learning (Chinn, 2005). Therefore, a peer assessment system with a grid-based knowledge classification approach based on knowledge engineering was developed. Scholars have indicated that the peer assessment process is challenging for students because they have difficulty knowing what and how to explain their evaluation; however, providing them with specific assistance and conducting knowledge acquisition are two main strategies for overcoming these problems (Lawrence & Zollinger, 2015). Therefore, the current study hypothesized that using a repertory grid method, one of the knowledge acquisition approaches in knowledge engineering, would help the students conduct peer assessment and learn from the process. Knowledge engineering refers to the process of developing expert systems which are artificial intelligence programs capable of imitating human decision-making processes on the basis of knowledge derived from domain experts. …

[1]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[2]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[3]  D. Hung,et al.  Situated Cognition, Vygotskian Thought and Learning from the Communities of Practice Perspective: Implications for the Design of Web-Based E-Learning , 2001 .

[4]  Jody Lawrence,et al.  Assessment Matters: Enriching Design Education through Online Peer Critique. , 2015 .

[5]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  N. Falchikov Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment , 1995 .

[7]  Chen‐Chung Liu *,et al.  Peer assessment through web‐based knowledge acquisition: tools to support conceptual awareness , 2005 .

[8]  K. Topping Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[9]  D. Kirk,et al.  Student teachers’ understanding and application of assessment for learning during a physical education teacher education course , 2016 .

[10]  Melissa J. Luna,et al.  Implementation of Interdisciplinary Group Learning and Peer Assessment in a Nanotechnology Engineering Course , 2004 .

[11]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Mindtools: Affording Multiple Knowledge Representations for Learning , 2020 .

[12]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  Discourse Analysis for Knowledge Acquisition: The Coherence Method , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  An innovative approach for developing and employing electronic libraries to support context-aware ubiquitous learning , 2010, Electron. Libr..

[14]  D. Boud,et al.  Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other , 2014 .

[15]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions , 2010 .

[16]  J. Wincent,et al.  Cognitive Constructions of Low–Profit and High–Profit Business Models: A Repertory Grid Study of Serial Entrepreneurs * , 2015 .

[17]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments , 2010 .

[18]  Jane Reid,et al.  A Task-Oriented Non-Interactive Evaluation Methodology for Information Retrieval Systems , 2000, Information Retrieval.

[19]  Mikko Vesisenaho,et al.  Perspectives on personal learning environments held by vocational students , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[20]  N. Shadbolt,et al.  Eliciting Knowledge from Experts: A Methodological Analysis , 1995 .

[21]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[22]  F. Dochy,et al.  Peer assessment in problem based learning , 2001 .

[23]  T. Huang,et al.  The Establishment and Application of a Labor Quality Index: The Case of Taiwan’s Manufacturing Industry , 2006 .

[24]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Integrating assessment tasks in a problem‐based learning environment , 2005 .

[25]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Effects of Behavioral Anchors on Peer Evaluation Reliability , 2005 .

[26]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  Using a Web-based portfolio assessment system to elevate project-based learning performances , 2011, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[27]  Shyan-Ming Yuan,et al.  Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Winslow Burleson,et al.  Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Capturing User Experiences of Mobile Information Technology with the Repertory Grid Technique , 2010 .

[30]  Pei-Di Shen,et al.  Enhance low-achieving students' learning involvement in Taiwan's higher education: an approach via e-learning with problem-based learning and self-regulated learning , 2010 .

[31]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[32]  Keng Siau,et al.  Important characteristics of software development team members: an empirical investigation using Repertory Grid , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Inservice Science Teachers Via Embedded Assessment , 2009 .

[34]  G. V. D. Berg The use of assessment in the development of higher-order thinking skills , 2004 .

[35]  Donald D. Chinn Peer assessment in the algorithms course , 2005, ITiCSE '05.

[36]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[37]  Jackie Phahlamohlaka,et al.  The Use of the Repertory Grid for Collaboration and Reflection in a Research Context , 2010 .

[38]  O. B. Assaraf,et al.  The repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students’ ecological system thinking abilities , 2014 .

[39]  Chao-hsiu Chen,et al.  The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Bloom’s Taxonomy , 2020 .

[41]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work , 2011 .

[42]  Chih-Kai Chang,et al.  Development of a reading material recommendation system based on a knowledge engineering approach , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Martin Valcke,et al.  How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? , 2012 .

[44]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Mindtool-Assisted In-Field Learning (MAIL): An Advanced Ubiquitous Learning Project in Taiwan , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[45]  T. Chan,et al.  A web‐based learning system for question‐posing and peer assessment , 2005 .

[46]  Chih-Kai Chang,et al.  A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  Prompting conceptual understanding with computer-mediated peer discourse and knowledge acquisition techniques , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[48]  ChangChi-Cheng,et al.  A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students , 2012 .

[49]  A. Zohar,et al.  Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? , 2003 .

[50]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[51]  Ya-Ting Carolyn Yang,et al.  Virtual CEOs: A blended approach to digital gaming for enhancing higher order thinking and academic achievement among vocational high school students , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[52]  Richard Bell,et al.  A manual for repertory grid technique , 1977 .

[53]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A web-based peer-assessment approach to improving junior high school students' performance, self-efficacy and motivation in performing arts courses , 2016, Br. J. Educ. Technol..