Matching bias in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a dual-process account from response times and confidence ratings

We examined matching bias in syllogistic reasoning by analysing response times, confidence ratings, and individual differences. Roberts’ (2005) “negations paradigm” was used to generate conflict between the surface features of problems and the logical status of conclusions. The experiment replicated matching bias effects in conclusion evaluation (Stupple & Waterhouse, 2009), revealing increased processing times for matching/logic “conflict problems”. Results paralleled chronometric evidence from the belief bias paradigm indicating that logic/belief conflict problems take longer to process than non-conflict problems (Stupple, Ball, Evans, & Kamal-Smith, 2011). Individuals’ response times for conflict problems also showed patterns of association with the degree of overall normative responding. Acceptance rates, response times, metacognitive confidence judgements, and individual differences all converged in supporting dual-process theory. This is noteworthy because dual-process predictions about heuristic/analytic conflict in syllogistic reasoning generalised from the belief bias paradigm to a situation where matching features of conclusions, rather than beliefs, were set in opposition to logic.

[1]  Qinglin Zhang,et al.  Cognitive control in belief-laden reasoning during conclusion processing: an ERP study. , 2013, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[2]  Donna Torrens.  Individual Differences and the Belief Bias Effect: Mental Models, Logical Necessity, and Abstract Reasoning , 1999 .

[3]  W. Neys,et al.  Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin , 2004 .

[5]  Gabriel Radvansky,et al.  Working memory and syllogistic reasoning , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  S. Frederick.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[7]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Edward J N Stupple,et al.  Figural effects in a syllogistic evaluation paradigm: an inspection-time analysis. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[9]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Dual Processing in Reasoning , 2006, Psychological science.

[10]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Belief–logic conflict resolution in syllogistic reasoning: Inspection-time evidence for a parallel-process model , 2008 .

[11]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. , 1997 .

[12]  K. Stanovich.  Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? , 2008 .

[13]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Norms for reasoning about decisions , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  E. Stupple,et al.  Short article: Negations in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a heuristic–analytic conflict , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Do people reason on the Wason selection task? A new look at the data of Ball et al. (2003) , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  V. Thompson.  Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective , 2009 .

[17]  Shira Elqayam.  Models of dependence and independence: A two-dimensional architecture of dual processing , 2009 .

[18]  N. Chater,et al.  The Probability Heuristics Model of Syllogistic Reasoning , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[20]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Problem Difficulty and Response Format in Syllogistic Reasoning , 1995 .

[21]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. , 2009 .

[22]  Jonathan St. B. T. Evans,et al.  Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications , 2011 .

[23]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  ‘Atmosphere’, matching, and logic in syllogistic reasoning , 1995 .

[24]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning , 2009 .

[25]  Jonathan Evans.  On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning , 2007 .

[26]  N. McGlynn.  Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[27]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. , 2006 .

[29]  Normative benchmarks are useful for studying individual differences in reasoning , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Vincenzo Lombardo,et al.  Model theory of deduction: a unified computational approach , 2001 .

[31]  Jonathan Evans.  How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? , 2009 .

[32]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[33]  Johnson-Laird Andruth,et al.  Only Reasoning , 2022 .

[34]  C. Santamaría,et al.  Figure and difficulty in syllogistic reasoning , 2000 .

[35]  Qinglin Zhang,et al.  Neural correlates of the belief-bias effect in syllogistic reasoning: an event-related potential study , 2008, Neuroreport.

[36]  V. Goel,et al.  Smarter Than We Think , 2008, Psychological science.

[37]  Maxwell J Roberts.  Expanding the universe of categorical syllogisms: A challenge for reasoning researchers , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[38]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  Intuition, reason, and metacognition , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[40]  P. Pollard,et al.  On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Valerie A Thompson,et al.  Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Jonathan St. B. T. Evans,et al.  Thinking and believing , 2000 .

[43]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[44]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Belief inhibition during thinking: Not always winning but at least taking part , 2009, Cognition.

[45]  E. Heit,et al.  Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: it's a response bias effect. , 2010, Psychological review.

[46]  G. Keren,et al.  Two Is Not Always Better Than One , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[47]  L. Rips.  The Psychology of Proof , 1994 .

[48]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  When logic and belief collide: Individual differences in reasoning times support a selective processing model , 2011 .

[49]  G. Boolos.  On ‘syllogistic inference’ , 1984, Cognition.

[50]  W. Neys.  Bias and Conflict A Case for Logical Intuitions , 2012 .

[51]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Cognitive Ability, Thinking Dispositions, and Instructional Set as Predictors of Critical Thinking. , 2007 .

[52]  L. Ball,et al.  Working Memory, Metacognitive Uncertainty, and Belief Bias in Syllogistic Reasoning , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[53]  K. Manktelow,et al.  The science of reason : a festschrift for Jonathan St. B.T. Evans , 2010 .

[54]  David R. Dowty.  The Role of Negative Polarity and Concord Marking in Natural Language Reasoning , 1994 .

[55]  S. Sloman.  Two systems of reasoning. , 2002 .

[56]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Syllogistic reasoning time: Disconfirmation disconfirmed , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  S. Handley,et al.  Logic feels so good-I like it! Evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  L. Ball,et al.  Effects of belief and logic on syllogistic reasoning: Eye-movement evidence for selective processing models. , 2006, Experimental psychology.