Simultaneous optimization of beam orientations, wedge filters and field weights for inverse planning with anatomy-based MLC fields.

As an alternative between manual planning and beamlet-based IMRT, we have developed an optimization system for inverse planning with anatomy-based MLC fields. In this system, named Ballista, the orientation (table and gantry), the wedge filter and the field weights are simultaneously optimized for every beam. An interesting feature is that the system is coupled to Pinnacle3 by means of the PinnComm interface, and uses its convolution dose calculation engine. A fully automatic MLC segmentation algorithm is also included. The plan evaluation is based on a quasi-random sampling and on a quadratic objective function with penalty-like constraints. For efficiency, optimal wedge angles and wedge orientations are determined using the concept of the super-omni wedge. A bound-constrained quasi-Newton algorithm performs field weight optimization, while a fast simulated annealing algorithm selects the optimal beam orientations. Moreover, in order to generate directly deliverable plans, the following practical considerations have been incorporated in the system: collision between the gantry and the table as well as avoidance of the radio-opaque elements of a table top. We illustrate the performance of the new system on two patients. In a rhabdomyosarcoma case, the system generated plans improving both the target coverage and the sparing of the parotide, as compared to a manually designed plan. In the second case presented, the system successfully produced an adequate plan for the treatment of the prostate while avoiding both hip prostheses. For the many cases where full IMRT may not be necessary, the system efficiently generates satisfactory plans meeting the clinical objectives, while keeping the treatment verification much simpler.

[1]  A. Boyer,et al.  Beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning. , 2000, Medical physics.

[2]  J. Dai,et al.  Optimizing beam weights and wedge filters with the concept of the super-omni wedge. , 2000, Medical physics.

[3]  P. Keall,et al.  Dosimetric considerations for patients with HIP prostheses undergoing pelvic irradiation. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 63. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  Jan van Santvoort,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of the Siemens Virtual Wedge , 1998 .

[5]  C Kappas,et al.  Graphical treatment simulation and automated collision detection for conformal and stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2001, Medical physics.

[6]  R L Siddon,et al.  Effective wedge angles with a universal wedge. , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  George Starkschall,et al.  Late rectal toxicity: dose-volume effects of conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  R Mohan,et al.  Application of fast simulated annealing to optimization of conformal radiation treatments. , 1993, Medical physics.

[9]  A. Niemierko,et al.  Random sampling for evaluating treatment plans. , 1990, Medical physics.

[10]  K S Lam,et al.  Comparison of simulated annealing algorithms for conformal therapy treatment planning. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  M. Goitein,et al.  Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Incorporating multi-leaf collimator leaf sequencing into iterative IMRT optimization. , 2002, Medical physics.

[13]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R Mohan,et al.  Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization system. , 2000, Medical physics.

[15]  C. Burman,et al.  Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  E. Hall,et al.  Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  S. Schild,et al.  Radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer in patients with prosthetic hips. , 1992, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[18]  S L Hancock,et al.  Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Number and orientations of beams in intensity-modulated radiation treatments. , 1997, Medical physics.

[20]  S. Webb Optimization by simulated annealing of three-dimensional conformal treatment planning for radiation fields defined by a multileaf collimator. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  A Brahme,et al.  Optimization of the dose delivery in a few field techniques using radiobiological objective functions. , 1993, Medical physics.

[22]  R Mohan,et al.  Dose-volume histograms. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  W. De Gersem,et al.  An anatomy-based beam segmentation tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its application to head-and-neck cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[25]  C G Rowbottom,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of beam orientations and beam weights in conformal radiotherapy. , 2001, Medical physics.

[26]  C G Rowbottom,et al.  Beam-orientation optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: clinical application to parotid gland tumours. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[27]  L. Xing,et al.  Incorporating prior knowledge into beam orientation optimization in IMRT. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  Frédéric Beaulieu,et al.  Automatic generation of anatomy-based MLC fields in aperture-based IMRT. , 2004, Medical physics.

[29]  Steve Webb,et al.  Elimination of importance factors for clinically accurate selection of beam orientations, beam weights and wedge angles in conformal radiation therapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[30]  J. Galvin,et al.  An optimized forward-planning technique for intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[31]  R Mohan,et al.  Clinically relevant optimization of 3-D conformal treatments. , 1992, Medical physics.

[32]  Ying Xiao,et al.  The use of mixed-integer programming for inverse treatment planning with pre-defined field segments. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.