Adaptation of transient responses of a movement-sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala

We studied temporal response properties of the H1 neuron by extracellular recording. This neuron is a wide-field movement-sensitive element in the visual system of the blowfly (Calliphora erythrocephala). If the neuron is stimulated with a stepwise pattern displacement in its preferred direction, it responds with a burst of action potentials. By repeating the stimulus step one obtains the average of the step response: a 20ms latency time followed by a sharp increase in average firing rate and a slower decay to the resting activity.We report that the characteristic decay time of the step response depends on the stimulus history. If the stimulus moved prior to the step, the higher the pattern velocity, the faster was the decay of the step response to the resting level. In quantitative terms, for velocities in the range 0.4–100°/s, the decay time-constant varies from 300–10ms and is smaller for higher velocities. The time-constant is only weakly affected by other stimulus parameters such as modulation depth or spatial wavelength, and is set independently in different areas of the visual field where it is tuned to the local velocity.We discuss a possible advantage of this form of adaptation for the processing of visual signals: The performance of the nolinear operations that extract information from the visual input can be optimized by prefiltering signals in the individual visual columns with a time-constant that decreases with stimulus velocity. It will be shown that both the test step response and the response to continuous movement can be described reasonably well by a correlation model with input filters that adapt their time-constants.

[1]  W. Reichardt Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems , 1957 .

[2]  D. Keehn,et al.  Two Types of Neurones Sensitive to Motion in the Optic Lobe of the Fly , 1966, Nature.

[3]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the flies Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  J. Limb,et al.  Estimating the Velocity of Moving Images in Television Signals , 1975 .

[5]  N. Strausfeld Atlas of an Insect Brain , 1976, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[6]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part II. Towards the underlying neural interactions , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[7]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part I. A quantitative analysis , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[8]  Willem Hendrik Zaagman,et al.  Some characteristics of the neural activity of directionally selective movement detectors in the visual system of the blowfly , 1977 .

[9]  H. A. K. Mastebroek,et al.  Movement detection: Performance of a wide-field element in the visual system of the blowfly , 1980, Vision Research.

[10]  John B. Goodenough The Ada Compiler Validation Capability , 1981 .

[11]  C. Wehrhahn,et al.  Microsurgical lesion of horizontal cells changes optomotor yaw responses in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  Robert R. de Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  Adaptive strategies in fly vision: On their image-processing qualities , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  THE CALLIPHORA PUPIL AND PHOTOTRANSDUCTION MODELING , 1983 .

[14]  K. Hausen The Lobula-Complex of the Fly: Structure, Function and Significance in Visual Behaviour , 1984 .

[15]  W. H. Zaagman,et al.  Saturation in a wide-field, directionally selective movement detection system in fly vision , 1984, Vision Research.

[16]  Erich Buchner,et al.  Behavioural Analysis of Spatial Vision in Insects , 1984 .

[17]  Shimon Ullman Analysis of visual motion by biological and computer systems , 1987 .

[18]  R. Pierantoni,et al.  A look into the cock-pit of the fly , 1976, Cell and Tissue Research.

[19]  Gilbert D. McCann,et al.  Binocular interactions of motion detection fibers in the optic lobes of flies , 1971, Kybernetik.

[20]  Hendrik Eckert,et al.  The horizontal cells in the lobula plate of the blowfly,Phaenicia sericata , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[21]  R. Hengstenberg Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[22]  Klaus Hausen,et al.  Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Angular sensitivity of blowfly photoreceptors: intracellular measurements and wave-optical predictions , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  Hendrik Eckert,et al.  Functional properties of the H1-neurone in the third optic Ganglion of the Blowfly,Phaenicia , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[25]  H. A. K. Mastebroek,et al.  Receptive field characteristics of a directionally selective movement detector in the visual system of the blowfly , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[26]  R. Hengstenberg,et al.  The number and structure of giant vertical cells (VS) in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[27]  Karl Georg Götz,et al.  Die optischen Übertragungseigenschaften der Komplexaugen von Drosophila , 1965, Kybernetik.

[28]  K. Hausen Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  W. Zaagman,et al.  On the correlation model: Performance of a movement detecting neural element in the fly visual system , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Spatial processing of visual information in the movement-detecting pathway of the fly , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.