Factors influencing densities of non‐indigenous species in the ballast water of ships arriving at ports in Puget Sound, Washington, United States

1. Oceanographic characteristics and the presence of international shipping in Puget Sound, Washington, USA contribute to its vulnerability to non-indigenous species (NIS) invasions. To evaluate NIS arriving in ballast water, zooplankton was sampled in 380 ballast tanks of ships after they entered Puget Sound. 2. Taxa were classified into a higher risk group of coastal organisms (including known NIS), and a lower risk group of largely oceanic species. Most ships reported conducting mid-ocean ballast water exchange (BWE). However, despite state regulations requiring BWE, and apparent compliance by ship operators, most sampled tanks from both transpacific and coastal routes had coastal zooplankton densities exceeding internationally proposed discharge standards. 3. BWE efficiency models and controlled before-and-after BWE experiments indicate that BWE consistently removes most coastal zooplankton. However, this study found that although the empty–refill method of BWE significantly reduced coastal plankton compared with un-exchanged tanks, the flow-through method did not, and in either case remaining coastal plankton densities presented appreciable risks of introducing NIS. 4. Densities of high risk taxa were consistently and significantly higher from US domestic trips dominated by tank ships carrying ballast water from California, and lower in samples from trans-Pacific trips dominated by container ships and bulk carriers with ballast from Asia. These findings are probably a result of the dense and diverse NIS assemblages present in California and other US west coast estuaries and the comparatively short transit times between them and Puget Sound. 5. While it appears that BWE can effectively replace NIS with less risky ocean species, new reporting, verification, and operational procedures may be necessary to enhance BWE efficacy. In the long-term, the introduction of ballast water treatment technologies may be required to significantly reduce the discharge of risky organisms from commercial ships if BWE practices do not become more effective. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Skip Albertson,et al.  Oceanographic Changes in Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca during the 2000–01 Drought , 2003 .

[2]  A. Rose,et al.  An analysis of flow-through ballast water exchange. Discussion , 1999 .

[3]  V. Ivanov,et al.  Invasion of the Caspian Sea by the Comb Jellyfish Mnemiopsis Leidyi (Ctenophora) , 2000, Biological Invasions.

[4]  Geoff Rigby,et al.  Novel ballast water heating technique offers cost-effective treatment to reduce the risk of global transport of harmful marine organisms , 1999 .

[5]  S. Bollens,et al.  Asian copepods on the move: recent invasions in the Columbia–Snake River system, USA , 2008 .

[6]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  History of aquatic invertebrate invasions in the Caspian Sea , 2003, Biological Invasions.

[7]  K. Murphy,et al.  Ballast Water Exchange : Efficacy of treating ships ’ ballast water to reduce marine species transfers and invasion success ? Final Report , 2005 .

[8]  W. Moore,et al.  Verification of mid-ocean ballast water exchange using naturally occurring coastal tracers. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[9]  S. Ohtsuka,et al.  Introduction of the Asian copepods Acartiella sinensis, Tortanus dextrilobatus (Copepoda : Calanoida), and Limnoithona tetraspina (Copepoda : Cyclopoida) to the San Francisco Estuary, California, USA , 1999 .

[10]  Mario N. Tamburri,et al.  Ballast water deoxygenation can prevent aquatic introductions while reducing ship corrosion , 2002 .

[11]  C. Levings,et al.  Mortality of Zooplankton and Invertebrate Larvae Exposed to Cyclonic Pre-Treatment and Ultraviolet Radiation , 2003 .

[12]  M. Dickman,et al.  Mid-ocean exchange of container vessel ballast water. 1: seasonal factors affecting the transport of harmful diatoms and dinoflagellates , 1999 .

[13]  Gregory M. Ruiz,et al.  Post-exchange zooplankton in ballast water of ships entering the San Francisco Estuary , 2005 .

[14]  M. Dickman,et al.  Mid-ocean exchange of container vessel ballast water. 2: Effects of vessel type in the transport of diatoms and dinoflagellates from Manzanillo, Mexico, to Hong Kong, China , 1999 .

[15]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  J. Carlton,et al.  Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and delta , 1995 .

[17]  Edward L. Mills,et al.  Exotic Species in the Great Lakes: A History of Biotic Crises and Anthropogenic Introductions , 1993 .

[18]  Stephan Gollasch,et al.  Survival of tropical ballast water organisms during a cruise from the Indian Ocean to the North Sea , 2000 .

[19]  Jeffery R. Cordell,et al.  The origin and identity of invertebrate organisms being transported to Canada's Pacific coast by ballast water , 2004 .

[20]  Taylor,et al.  Trans-Pacific shipboard trials on planktonic communities as indicators of open ocean ballast water exchange , 2007 .

[21]  Cohen,et al.  Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary , 1998, Science.

[22]  William A. Stubblefield,et al.  Ozone treatment of ballast water on the oil tanker S/T Tonsina: chemistry, biology and toxicity , 2006 .

[23]  Gregory M Ruiz,et al.  Supply-side invasion ecology: characterizing propagule pressure in coastal ecosystems , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  M. Wonham,et al.  Trends in marine biological invasions at local and regional scales: the Northeast Pacific Ocean as a model system , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[25]  N. Mandrak,et al.  The risk of establishment of aquatic invasive species: joining invasibility and propagule pressure , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Forbes L. Darby.  Stemming the tide: Controlling introductions of nonindigenous species by ships' ballast water , 1997 .

[27]  T. D. Waite,et al.  Removal of natural populations of marine plankton by a large-scale ballast water treatment system , 2003 .

[28]  J. Geller,et al.  Ecological Roulette: The Global Transport of Nonindigenous Marine Organisms , 1993, Science.

[29]  James T. Carlton,et al.  Shipping Study: The Role of Shipping in the Introduction of Non-indigenous Aquatic Organisms to the Coastal Waters of the United States (Other than the Great Lakes) and an Analysis of Control Options. , 1995 .

[30]  G. Ruiz,et al.  The Potential for Intracoastal Transfer of Non-indigenous Species in the Ballast Water of Ships , 1999 .

[31]  David F. Reid,et al.  Current state of understanding about the effectiveness of ballest water exchange (BWE) in reducing aquatic nonindigenous species (ANS) introductions to the Great Lakes Basin and Chesapeake Bay, USA : synthesis and analysis of existing information , 2007 .

[32]  William C. Walton,et al.  Going to the source: role of the invasion pathway in determining potential invaders , 2001 .

[33]  Marjorie J. Wonham,et al.  Modelling the invasion risk of diapausing organisms transported in ballast sediments , 2005 .

[34]  Matej David,et al.  Critical review of the IMO international convention on the management of ships’ ballast water and sediments , 2007 .

[35]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Bridging Troubled Waters: Biological Invasions, Transoceanic Shipping, and the Laurentian Great Lakes , 2004 .