Design of joint systems: a theoretical challenge for cognitive systems engineering

In this paper the “joint systems approach” will be discussed. The approach is considered as a new paradigm in cognitive systems engineering (CSE). Its central idea, that human and technology form a functional unity, is as such not new. Why, then, has this idea become so appealing right now? In the first part of the paper we seek answers to this question by analysing the current situation in product design. The conclusion is that the focus of design is shifting from single products to intelligent environments. This change in focus induces tensions into the design process that urge for solutions. One of them is re-conceptualising the relationship between human and technology, precisely what the joint system approach is about. Three different joint system approaches are considered: the joint cognitive systems approach (JCS), the Risö extended CSE approach, and the joint intelligent systems (JIS) approach proposed by us. Comparisons are made with regard to how these approaches understand the joint system to be organised. While the JCS approach focuses on the human–technology relationship, the other two consider this relationship as embedded in a context of object-oriented activity. As a consequence, environment becomes included in the joint system. In JIS approach we propose the use of the semiotic concept of habit to characterise the ways of functioning of the joint system. “Habit” is a tool for identifying generic patterns in the situation-specific behaviour of the system. Defining habits enables expressing the meaning or purpose of the system’s functioning. In the end of the paper, we propose a design process model for the development of JIS. This approach is aimed at designing systems in usage i.e. to design of practices.

[1]  Raanan Lipshitz,et al.  How professionals make decisions. , 2004 .

[2]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[3]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2005 .

[4]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[5]  Richard E. Fairley,et al.  The concept of operations: The bridge from operational requirements to technical specifications , 1997, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[6]  Victor Kestenbaum The Phenomenological Sense of John Dewey: Habit and Meaning , 1977 .

[7]  Paula Savioja,et al.  Systems Usability - Promoting Core-Task Oriented Work Practices , 2008, Maturing Usability.

[8]  Lynne M. Coventry,et al.  Human Factors , 2010, Handbook of Financial Cryptography and Security.

[9]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[10]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Workplace Studies: Situating workplace studies within the human-computer interaction field , 2000 .

[11]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction , 1986 .

[12]  T. Ingold The perception of the environment : essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill , 2000 .

[13]  Donald A. Norman Interaction design is still an art form.: ergonomics is real engineering , 2006, INTR.

[14]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research , 2006 .

[15]  A. Elzinga The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[16]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Prolegomenon to cognitive task design , 2003 .

[17]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[18]  T. Järvilehto The theory of the organism-environment system: III. Role of efferent influences on receptors in the formation of knowledge. , 1999 .

[19]  Paula Savioja,et al.  USABILITY EVALUATION OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[20]  T. Järvilehto,et al.  The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory , 1998, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[21]  J. Pickering,et al.  The Self Is A Semiotic Process. , 1999 .

[22]  K. Kuutti 1 DESIGN RESEARCH , DISCIPLINES , AND NEW PRODUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE , 2007 .

[23]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Mapping Cognitive Demands in Complex Problem-Solving Worlds , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[24]  W. Elm,et al.  Applied Cognitive Work Analysis: A Pragmatic Methodology for Designing Revolutionary Cognitive Affordances , 2003 .

[25]  Hanne Albrechtsen,et al.  Affordances in Activity Theory and Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2001 .

[26]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[27]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[28]  T. Järvilehto Theory of the organism-environment system: IV. The problem on mental activity and consciousness , 2000 .

[29]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems: Patterns in Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2006 .

[30]  S. Vereza Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 2001 .

[31]  E. Hollnagel Handbook of Cognitive Task Design , 2009 .

[32]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Complex Mediation , 2005, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[34]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[35]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[36]  T. Jarvilehto,et al.  Theory of the organism-environment system: IV. The problem on mental activity and consciousness , 2000, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[37]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering: New wine in new bottles , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  T. Järvilehto,et al.  The theory of the organism-environment system: II. Significance of nervous activity in the organism-environment system , 1998, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[39]  T. Saarinen Perception of environment , 1969 .

[40]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[41]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Merging paradigms: Decision Making, Management, and Cognitive Control , 1996 .

[42]  Jakob von Uexküll,et al.  A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds , 1992 .