VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1

ABSTRACT: The State of Texas has initiated the development of a Total Maximum Daily Load program in the Bosque River Watershed, where point and nonpoint sources of pollution are a concern. Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was validated for flow, sediment, and nutrients in the watershed to evaluate alternative management scenarios and estimate their effects in controlling pollution. This paper discusses the calibration and validation at two locations, Hico and Valley Mills, along the North Bosque River. Calibration for flow was performed from 1960 through 1998. Sediment and nutrient calibration was done from 1993 through 1997 at Hico and from 1996 through 1997 at Valley Mills. Model validation was performed for 1998. Time series plots and statistical measures were used to verify model predictions. Predicted values generally matched well with the observed values during calibration and validation (R2≥ 0.6 and Nash‐Suttcliffe Efficiency ≥ 0.5, in most instances) except for some underprediction of nitrogen during calibration at both locations and sediment and organic nutrients during validation at Valley Mills. This study showed that SWAT was able to predict flow, sediment, and nutrients successfully and can be used to study the effects of alternative management scenarios.

[1]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  APPLICATION OF A WATERSHED MODEL TO EVALUATE MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION , 2001 .

[2]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  APPLICATION OF SWAT FOR THE UPPER NORTH BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED , 2000 .

[3]  Dale M. Robertson,et al.  Influence of various water quality sampling strategies on load estimates for small streams , 1999 .

[4]  Arnold,et al.  CONTINENTAL SCALE SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC BALANCE 1 , 1999 .

[5]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Prediction of Stream Channel Erosion Potential , 1999 .

[6]  Larry M. Hauck,et al.  Relating Agricultural Land Uses to In-Stream Stormwater Quality , 1999 .

[7]  J. Arnold,et al.  AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS 1 , 1999 .

[8]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[9]  Philip W. Gassmann.  The National Pilot Program Integrated Modeling System: Environmental Baseline Assumptions and Results for the APEX Model , 1997 .

[10]  Edward Osei,et al.  Livestock and the Environment: A National Pilot Project: The policy Space, Economic Model, and Environmental Model Linkages , 1995 .

[11]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  INTEGRATION OF A BASIN‐SCALE WATER QUALITY MODEL WITH GIS , 1994 .

[12]  Gilbert T. Bernhardt,et al.  A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model , 1993 .

[13]  T. McMahon,et al.  Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses , 1990 .

[14]  John R. Williams,et al.  A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity [EPIC, Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator, mathematical models] , 1984 .

[15]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  UNCERTAINTIES IN ESTIMATING THE WATER BALANCE OF LAKES , 1981 .

[16]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  CREAMS: a field scale model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems [USA] , 1980 .

[17]  R. Bagnold.  Bed load transport by natural rivers , 1977 .

[18]  Jimmy R. Williams.  Sediment Routing for Agricultural Watersheds , 1975 .

[19]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[20]  A. Hassan.  State of Texas , 1957 .