Stability in the metamemory realism of eyewitness confidence judgments

The stability of eyewitness confidence judgments over time in regard to their reported memory and accuracy of these judgments is of interest in forensic contexts because witnesses are often interviewed many times. The present study investigated the stability of the confidence judgments of memory reports of a witnessed event and of the accuracy of these judgments over three occasions, each separated by 1 week. Three age groups were studied: younger children (8–9 years), older children (10–11 years), and adults (19–31 years). A total of 93 participants viewed a short film clip and were asked to answer directed two-alternative forced-choice questions about the film clip and to confidence judge each answer. Different questions about details in the film clip were used on each of the three test occasions. Confidence as such did not exhibit stability over time on an individual basis. However, the difference between confidence and proportion correct did exhibit stability across time, in terms of both over/underconfidence and calibration. With respect to age, the adults and older children exhibited more stability than the younger children for calibration. Furthermore, some support for instability was found with respect to the difference between the average confidence level for correct and incorrect answers (slope). Unexpectedly, however, the younger children’s slope was found to be more stable than the adults. Compared to the previous research, the present study’s use of more advanced statistical methods provides a more nuanced understanding of the stability of confidence judgments in the eyewitness reports of children and adults.

[1]  Child witnesses' metamemory realism. , 2006, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[2]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Handbook of Metamemory and Memory , 2013 .

[3]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Measuring Metacognitive Judgments , 2009 .

[4]  J. Asendorpf.  Individual, Differential, and Aggregate Stability of Social Competence , 1989 .

[5]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  The Confidence of Eyewitnesses in Their Identifications From Lineups , 2002 .

[6]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[7]  W. Schneider.  The Development of Metacognitive Knowledge in Children and Adolescents: Major Trends and Implications for Education , 2008 .

[8]  Edith Greene,et al.  Juror Decision‐Making , 2008 .

[9]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[10]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[11]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Metacognition: A Bridge Between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice , 2004 .

[12]  Hugo Quené,et al.  On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: a tutorial , 2004, Speech Commun..

[13]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Subjective probability accuracy analysis. , 1994 .

[14]  N. Anderson,et al.  Children's judgments of expected value. , 1994 .

[15]  Carl Martin Allwood,et al.  Stability and variability in the realism of confidence judgments over time, content domain, and gender , 2003 .

[16]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Can People Detect Eyewitness-Identification Accuracy Within and Across Situations? , 1981 .

[17]  J. Nadel,et al.  Social Competence in Developmental Perspective , 1989 .

[18]  Thomas H. Ollendick,et al.  COMPARING PERSONAL TRAJECTORIES AND DRAWING CAUSAL INFERENCES FROM LONGITUDINAL DATA , 2008 .

[19]  A. Koriat.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. , 1993 .

[20]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. , 1979, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  W. Schneider,et al.  Applied Metacognition: The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents , 2002 .

[22]  B. Bornstein,et al.  " I know I know it, I know I saw it": The stability of the confidence–accuracy relationship across domains , 1999 .

[23]  R. Lindsay,et al.  HANDBOOK OF EYEWITNESS PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[24]  A. Koriat.  Memory''s knowledge of its own knowledge: The accessibility account of the feeling of knowing , 1994 .

[25]  G. Wolters,et al.  Repeated partial eyewitness questioning causes confidence inflation but not retrieval-induced forgetting. , 2009 .

[26]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases , 1988 .

[27]  Gunilla Fredin,et al.  Children's and adults’ realism in their event-recall confidence in responses to free recall and focused questions , 2008 .

[28]  L. Stankov,et al.  Confidence judgments in studies of individual differences , 1996 .

[29]  Amina Memon,et al.  Eyewitness Evidence , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[30]  J. Berry,et al.  Analyzing Longitudinal Data with Multilevel Models: An Example with Individuals Living with Lower Extremity Intra-articular Fractures. , 2008, Rehabilitation psychology.

[31]  G. Wells,et al.  Distortions in Eyewitnesses' Recollections: Can the Postidentification-Feedback Effect Be Moderated? , 1999 .

[32]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Handbook of Metacognition in Education , 2009 .

[33]  Anders Winman,et al.  Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation , 1996 .

[34]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions , 1984 .

[35]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[36]  Carl Martin Allwood,et al.  The Cognitive Interview: Effects on the realism in witnesses’ confidence in their free recall , 2005 .

[37]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Belief of Eyewitness Identification Evidence , 2007 .

[38]  S. Lichtenstein,et al.  Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?*1 , 1977 .

[39]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art , 1977 .

[41]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[42]  L. Stankov,et al.  Self-confidence and metacognitive processes , 2007 .

[43]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making , 1990 .

[44]  D. S. Lindsay,et al.  Remembering Mistaken for Knowing: Ease of Retrieval as a Basis for Confidence in Answers to General Knowledge Questions , 1993 .

[45]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not of the absolute performance on an individual item. Comments on Schraw (1995) , 1996 .

[46]  W. B. Thompson,et al.  Instability of individual differences in the association between confidence judgments and memory performance , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Claudia M. Roebers,et al.  Developmental progression in the confidence-accuracy relationship in event recall: insights provided by a calibration perspective , 2007 .

[48]  Daniel B. Wright,et al.  When Eyewitnesses Talk , 2009 .

[49]  C. M. Allwood,et al.  Child and adult witnesses: the effect of repetition and invitation-probes on free recall and metamemory realism , 2011 .

[50]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  How eyewitnesses talk about events: implications for memory , 2005 .

[51]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  Eyewitness Confidence and the Confidence-Accuracy Relationship in Memory for People , 2006 .

[52]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY : A META-ANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES , 1995 .

[53]  Self-confidence and metacognitive processes , 2007 .

[54]  Michael Diaz,et al.  Measurement of relative metamnemonic accuracy. , 2008 .

[55]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Sabina Kleitman.  Metacognition in the Rationality Debate , 2008 .

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[58]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha , 2008, Psychometrika.

[59]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Information-based and experience-based metacognitive judgments: Evidence from subjective confidence. , 2008 .

[60]  Kevin Allan,et al.  Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? , 2003 .

[61]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The Reiteration Effect in Hindsight Bias , 1997 .

[62]  H. Paterson,et al.  Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion , 2006 .

[63]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Accuracy of confidence judgments: Stability and generality in the learning process and predictive validity for learning outcome , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[64]  T. Perfect.  Applied Metacognition: When does eyewitness confidence predict performance? , 2002 .

[65]  Sean M. Lane,et al.  How events are reviewed matters: Effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility , 2001, Memory & cognition.