moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity

This paper offers a practically motivated method for evaluating systems’ abilities to handle external stress. The method is designed to assess the potential contributions of various adaptation options to improving systems’ coping capacities by focusing attention directly on the underlying determinants of adaptive capacity. The method should be sufficiently flexible to accommodate diverse applications whose contexts are location specific and path dependent without imposing the straightjacket constraints of a ‘‘one size fits all’’ cookbook approach. Nonetheless, the method should produce unitless indicators that can be employed to judge the relative vulnerabilities of diverse systems to multiple stresses and to their potential interactions. An artificial application is employed to describe the development of the method and to illustrate howit might be applied. Some empirical evidence is offered to underscore the significance of the determinants of adaptive capacity in determining vulnerability; these are the determinants upon which the method is constructed. The method is, finally, applied directly to expert judgments of six different adaptations that could reduce vulnerability in the Netherlands to increased flooding along the Rhine River. r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  A. A. Olsthoorn,et al.  Floods, flood management and climate change in the Netherlands , 2001 .

[2]  James A. Tobey,et al.  An empirical study of the economic effects of climate change on world agriculture , 1992 .

[3]  G. Berz Catastrophes and Climate Change: Concerns and Possible Countermeasures of the Insurance Industry , 1999 .

[4]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[5]  Thomas R. Karl,et al.  Secular Trends of Precipitation Amount, Frequency, and Intensity in the United States , 1998 .

[6]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  The Science of Adaptation: A Framework for Assessment , 1999 .

[7]  A. A. Olsthoorn The evolution of acceptable risk , 2000 .

[8]  Jesse H. Ausubel,et al.  Climate Impact Assessment , 1985 .

[9]  Dianne Gilbert Not in My Backyard , 1993 .

[10]  A. A. Olsthoorn,et al.  Institutional framework for the management of the rivers Rhine and Meuse in the Netherlands, an overview , 2001 .

[11]  Linda O. Mearns,et al.  MEAN AND VARIANCE CHANGE IN CLIMATE SCENARIOS: METHODS, AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS, AND MEASURES OF UNCERTAINTY , 1997 .

[12]  Jan de Vries,et al.  Analysis of Historical Climate-Society Interaction , 1985 .

[13]  Thomas E. Downing,et al.  Climate change and world food security , 1996 .

[14]  Roger Jones,et al.  Adaptation to What and Why? , 2000 .

[15]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  An Anatomy of Adaptation to Climate Change and Variability , 2000 .

[16]  Gary W. Yohe,et al.  Sea-Level Change: The Expected Economic Cost of Protection Or Abandonment in the United States , 1998 .

[17]  B. Smit,et al.  Human adaptation to climatic variability and change , 1997 .

[18]  Gary W. Yohe,et al.  The economic cost of greenhouse-induced sea-level rise for developed property in the United States , 1996 .

[19]  Ian Burton,et al.  The hazardousness of a place: A regional ecology of damaging events , 1971 .

[20]  T. Heckelei,et al.  Global Environmental Change , 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology.

[21]  A. A. Olsthoorn,et al.  Adapting to climate change: a case study on riverine flood risks in the Netherlands , 1999 .

[22]  Graeme Hugo,et al.  Population and Disaster. , 1991 .