Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic

BackgroundConsumer e-Health is a potential solution to the problems of accessibility, quality and costs of delivering public healthcare services to patients. Although consumer e-Health has proliferated in recent years, it remains unclear if patients are willing and able to accept and use this new and rapidly developing technology. Therefore, the aim of this research is to study the factors influencing patients’ acceptance and usage of consumer e-health innovations.MethodsA simple but typical consumer e-health innovation – an e-appointment scheduling service – was developed and implemented in a primary health care clinic in a regional town in Australia. A longitudinal case study was undertaken for 29 months after system implementation. The major factors influencing patients’ acceptance and use of the e-appointment service were examined through the theoretical lens of Rogers’ innovation diffusion theory. Data were collected from the computer log records of 25,616 patients who visited the medical centre in the entire study period, and from in-depth interviews with 125 patients.ResultsThe study results show that the overall adoption rate of the e-appointment service increased slowly from 1.5% at 3 months after implementation, to 4% at 29 months, which means only the ‘innovators’ had used this new service. The majority of patients did not adopt this innovation. The factors contributing to the low the adoption rate were: (1) insufficient communication about the e-appointment service to the patients, (2) lack of value of the e-appointment service for the majority of patients who could easily make phone call-based appointment, and limitation of the functionality of the e-appointment service, (3) incompatibility of the new service with the patients’ preference for oral communication with receptionists, and (4) the limitation of the characteristics of the patients, including their low level of Internet literacy, lack of access to a computer or the Internet at home, and a lack of experience with online health services. All of which are closely associated with the low socio-economic status of the study population.ConclusionThe findings point to a need for health care providers to consider and address the identified factors before implementing more complicated consumer e-health innovations.

[1]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  Daniel R. Masys,et al.  Patient-Centered Access to Secure Systems Online (PCASSO): a secure approach to clinical data access via the World Wide Web , 1997, AMIA.

[3]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Ting-Ting Lee,et al.  Nurses' adoption of technology: application of Rogers' innovation-diffusion model. , 2004, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[6]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Consumer E-Health: An Overview of Research Evidence and Implications for Future Policy , 2011, Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia.

[7]  E. Macpherson,et al.  The Relationship Between the Physical Functioning of Older Adults and Their Use of a Personal Health Record: A Systematic Review , 2014, Current Geriatrics Reports.

[8]  Valerie Njie,et al.  Internet Usage by Low-Literacy Adults Seeking Health Information: An Observational Analysis , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  Appointment scheduling in health care: Challenges and opportunities , 2008 .

[10]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Consumer health informatics , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  R. LaRose,et al.  A Social-Cognitive Approach to Uses and Gratifications , 2008 .

[12]  M. Murray,et al.  Same-day appointments: exploding the access paradigm. , 2000, Family practice management.

[13]  Otieno George Ochieng,et al.  Factors Influencing Diffusion of Electronic Medical Records: A Case Study in Three Healthcare Institutions in Japan , 2006, Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia.

[14]  Monica M. Horvath,et al.  Impact of Health Portal Enrollment With Email Reminders on Adherence to Clinic Appointments: A Pilot Study , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  R. LaRose,et al.  Understanding Internet Usage , 2001 .

[16]  Hua Yang,et al.  Questionnaire survey about use of an online appointment booking system in one large tertiary public hospital outpatient service center in China , 2014, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[17]  Jessica Ho,et al.  Consumer Health Informatics , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[18]  Joseph Tan,et al.  Perceived Usefulness and Behavioral Intention to Use Consumer-Oriented Web-Based Health Tools: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, AMCIS.

[19]  Xiaojun Zhang,et al.  Patients' adoption of the e-appointment scheduling service: A case study in primary healthcare , 2014, HIC.

[20]  Barbara Cherry,et al.  Factors Affecting Electronic Health Record Adoption in Long‐Term Care Facilities , 2008, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[21]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  eHealth communication and behavior change: promise and performance , 2010 .

[22]  A. Fairhurst,et al.  The influence of consumer traits and demographics on intention to use retail self‐service checkouts , 2010 .

[23]  Ping Yu,et al.  The changes in caregivers' perceptions about the quality of information and benefits of nursing documentation associated with the introduction of an electronic documentation system in a nursing home , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[24]  Bruce K Armstrong,et al.  Challenges in health and health care for Australia , 2007, The Medical journal of Australia.

[25]  Marian van der Weide,et al.  Adoption of innovations by specialised nurses: personal, work and organisational characteristics. , 2004, Health policy.

[26]  E. Murphy,et al.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[27]  Fiona Chew,et al.  Doctors on-line: using diffusion of innovations theory to understand internet use. , 2004, Family medicine.

[28]  E. Vance Wilson,et al.  Current Trends in Patients' Adoption of Advanced E-Health Services , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[30]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[31]  H Grain,et al.  Investing in E-Health: People, Knowledge and Technology for a Healthy Future - Selected Papers from the 22nd Australian National Health Informatics Conference, HIC 2014, 11-14 August 2014, Melbourne, Australia , 2014, HIC.

[32]  Barbara Carty,et al.  Consumer informatics in primary care. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[33]  Ping Yu,et al.  The benefits of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care facilities: A multiple case study , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[34]  Nicola Mead,et al.  More than technology and access: primary care patients' views on the use and non-use of health information in the Internet age. , 2004, Health & social care in the community.

[35]  Peter Williams,et al.  Non use of health information kiosks examined in an information needs context. , 2003, Health information and libraries journal.

[36]  Susan S. Woods,et al.  Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. , 2008, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[37]  Yongyong Xu,et al.  A web-based appointment system to reduce waiting for outpatients: A retrospective study , 2011, BMC health services research.

[38]  F Dexter,et al.  Design of appointment systems for preanesthesia evaluation clinics to minimize patient waiting times: a review of computer simulation and patient survey studies. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[39]  M. Klein-Fedyshin,et al.  Consumer Health Informatics-Integrating Patients, Providers, and Professionals Online , 2002, Medical reference services quarterly.

[40]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations (5. ed.) , 2003 .

[41]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Review Paper: A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information Technology , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[42]  Alla Keselman,et al.  Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[43]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Technology infusion in service encounters , 2000 .

[44]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[45]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[46]  Namkee Choi,et al.  Relationship Between Health Service Use and Health Information Technology Use Among Older Adults: Analysis of the US National Health Interview Survey , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[47]  Deborah Helitzer,et al.  Assessing or predicting adoption of telehealth using the diffusion of innovations theory: a practical example from a rural program in New Mexico. , 2003, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[48]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..