A Structured Approach for Investigating the Causes of Medical Device Adverse Events

Aim. Medical device-related adverse events are often ascribed to “device” or “operator” failure although there are more complex causes. A structured approach, viewing the device in its clinical context, is developed to assist in-depth investigations of the causes. Method. Medical device applications involve devices, clinical teams, patients, and supporting infrastructure. The literature was explored for investigations and approaches to investigations, particularly structured approaches. From this a conceptual framework of causes was developed based primarily on device and clinical team caring for the patient within a supporting infrastructure, each aspect having detailed subdivisions. The approach was applied to incidents from the literature and an anonymous incident database. Results. The approach identified and classified the underlying causes of incidents described in the literature, exploring the details of “device,” “operator,” or “infrastructure” failures. Applied to incident databases it suggested that causes differ between device types and identified the causes of device unavailability. Discussion. The structured approach enables digging deeper to uncover the wider causes rather than ascribing to device or user fault. It can assess global patterns of causes. It can help develop consistent terminology for describing and sharing information on the causes of medical device adverse events.

[1]  K. Gray,et al.  Implementing a critical care course for ward nurses. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[2]  John Amoore,et al.  Learning from adverse incidents involving medical devices. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[3]  Human error and patient-controlled analgesia pumps. , 1997, Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society.

[4]  T. Clark Impact of Clinical Alarms on Patient Safety: A Report From the American College of Clinical Engineering Healthcare Technology Foundation , 2007 .

[5]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Celia Riga,et al.  Surgical technology and operating-room safety failures: a systematic review of quantitative studies , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[7]  Christian Koch,et al.  Infusion pump delivers over-dosage of propofol as a result of missing syringe support. , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Tubing misload allows free flow event with smart intravenous infusion pump. , 2006, Anesthesiology.

[9]  P. Maurette [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[10]  Brown Sl,et al.  Human error and patient-controlled analgesia pumps. , 1997 .

[11]  Rollin J Fairbanks,et al.  Hazards with medical devices: the role of design. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  John Amoore,et al.  Learning from adverse incidents involving medical devices , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  S. Crawford The U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 2009 .

[14]  John Amoore,et al.  Infusion devices: characteristics, limitations and risk management. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[15]  James R Ward,et al.  An analysis of medical device-related errors: prevalence and possible solutions , 2004, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[16]  Susan F. Paparella Inadvertent attachment of a blood pressure device to a needleless IV "Y-site": surprising, fatal connections. , 2005, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[17]  Jane Benner,et al.  Take a byte: Evaluating Web sites. , 2005, Nursing.

[18]  Elizabeth Jackson An overview of chronic fatigue syndrome. , 2002, Nursing Standard.

[19]  Pierre Lewalle,et al.  Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: the conceptual framework , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[20]  J. Samet,et al.  From the Food and Drug Administration. , 2002, JAMA.

[21]  J. Reason Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  I. Suleiman,et al.  Prevalence and control of hypertension in a Niger Delta semi urban community, Nigeria , 2013, Pharmacy practice.

[23]  Learning out of the piranha infested pool: a corporate risk register , 2006 .

[24]  B. Gallauresi,et al.  Luer-lock misconnects can be deadly. , 2005, Nursing.

[25]  J. R. Grout,et al.  Mistake proofing: changing designs to reduce error , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.