An evaluation of the accelerated expectation maximization algorithms for single-photon emission tomography image reconstruction

We previously reported that brain single-photon emission tomography (SPET) images could be improved by using an attenuation coefficient map constructed with transmission data and the iterative expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. However, the conventional EM algorithm (CEM) typically requires 30–80 iterations to provide acceptable results, limiting its clinical applicability. Several methods have been proposed to accelerate the EM algorithm. The purpose of this study was to search for a practical method for accelerating the EM algorithm. The methods investigated here include the accelerated EM algorithm (ACEM) using additive correction, ACEM using multiplicative correction, and Tanaka's filtered iterative reconstruction method (FIR). These methods were assessed by simulated SPET studies of a phantom incorporating nonuniform attenuation and by reference to clinical brain SPET data. In the simulation studies, the above methods were evaluated by using three parameters (root mean square error, log likelihood value, and contrast recovery coefficient); the results showed that FIR had an advantage over other methods in terms of all parameters. The results obtained using the clinical data demonstrated that FIR could reconstruct acceptable images in only five iterations. These results show that FIR offers significant advantages over CEM or other ACEMs, indicating that FIR can make the EM algorithm practical for clinical use in SPET.

[1]  J R Perry,et al.  Correction of nonuniform attenuation in cardiac SPECT imaging. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  S. Strother,et al.  Practical tradeoffs between noise, quantitation, and number of iterations for maximum likelihood-based reconstructions. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[3]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  On The Acceleration Of Maximum Likelihood Algorithms , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[4]  S C Strother,et al.  The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Kenya Murase,et al.  A comparative study of attenuation correction algorithms in single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Kenya Murase,et al.  Improvement of brain single photon emission tomography (SPET) using transmission data acquisition in a four-head SPET scanner , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  K. Hashikawa,et al.  A new apparatus for brain imaging: four-head rotating gamma camera single-photon emission computed tomograph. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Eiichi Tanaka A Fast Reconstruction Algorthm for Stationary Positron Emission Tomography Based on a Modified EM Algorithm , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Fusion of Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody SPECT Images with CT/MRI Images , 1992 .

[11]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Accelerated Iterative Reconstruction for Positron Emission Tomography Based on the EM Algorithm for Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.