Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.

1. Amplitude modulation (AM) is a pervasive property of acoustic communication systems. In the present study we investigate neural temporal mechanisms in the auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei of the pentobarbital sodium-anesthesized cat associated with the neural coding of 100% AM tones, both in quiet and in the presence of wideband, quasi-flat-spectrum noise. The AM carrier frequency was set to the neuron's characteristic frequency (CF) and the sound pressure level (SPL) of acoustic stimuli was varied over a wide dynamic range of intensities (< or = 40 dB). The temporal AM-encoding capability of auditory neurons was measured by computing the synchronization coefficient (SC) of the neural response to the signal's modulation and carrier frequency. The temporal modulation transfer function (tMTF) of a neuron was then computed by measuring the SC of the response to signals of variable fmod (50-2550 Hz). 2. Neurons in the cochlear nuclei synchronize on average more highly to the modulation frequency than fibers of comparable CF, threshold, and spontaneous rate in the auditory nerve. The disparity in performance is greatest at high SPLs and low signal-to-noise ratios. However, there is a significant degree of diversity in AM-encoding capability among neurons in both the cochlear nuclei and auditory nerve. Among auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), low- and medium-spontaneous-rate (SR) units (SR < 18 spike/s) phase-lock with greater precision than comparable high-SR units at any given frequency, particularly at moderate to high SPLs, consistent with previous studies. 3. The phase-locking capabilities of neurons in the cochlear nucleus are considerably more variable than in the auditory nerve. Moreover, the variability itself depends on two distinct measures of phase-locking performance. Most ANFs are capable of phase-locking to frequencies as high as 3-4 kHz. In the cochlear nucleus many unit types do not phase-lock to modulation frequencies > 1 kHz. As a result, phase-locking performance is measured on the basis of two parameters, maximum synchronization, irrespective of stimulus frequency, and the upper frequency limit for significant phase-locking. 4. Cochlear nucleus neurons may be divided into three distinct groups on the basis of maximum synchronization capability. In group 1 are the primary-like (PL) units of the anteroventral division, whose phase-locking capabilities are comparable with those of high-SR ANFs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  Robert D. Frisina Enhancement of responses to amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: Single‐unit recordings using an improved surgical approach , 1984 .

[2]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Operating range and maximum response of single auditory nerve fibers , 1980, Brain Research.

[3]  Edwin R. Lewis,et al.  Speculations about noise and the evolution of vertebrate hearing , 1987, Hearing Research.

[4]  E. Javel Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: implications for the pitch of complex tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D. Ryugo,et al.  Endbulbs of held and spherical bushy cells in cats: Morphological correlates with physiological properties , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Structural and functional properties distinguish two types of multipolar cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  A. Møller,et al.  Coding of amplitude and frequency modulated sounds in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. , 1972, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  Philip H Smith,et al.  Responses of Cochlear Nucleus Cells and Projections of their Axons , 1993 .

[9]  R. Snyder,et al.  Topographic organization of the central projections of the spiral ganglion in cats , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Characterization of HRP‐labeled globular bushy cells in the cat anteroventral cochlear nucleus , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  M. Sachs,et al.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Pitch of Periodic Pulses without Fundamental Component , 1959 .

[13]  E. Evans Place and time coding of frequency in the peripheral auditory system: some physiological pros and cons. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  M. Sachs,et al.  Classification of unit types in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus: PST histograms and regularity analysis. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Terrance Raymond Bourk,et al.  Electrical responses of neural units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1976 .

[16]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement , 1990, Hearing Research.

[17]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Encoding timing and intensity in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  L. A. Westerman,et al.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses , 1984, Hearing Research.

[19]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  Possible Role of Low and Medium Spontaneous Rate Cochlear Nerve Fibers in the Encoding of Waveform Periodicity , 1986 .

[20]  James L. Flanagan,et al.  On the Pitch of Periodic Pulses , 1960 .

[21]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  W. Shofner,et al.  Regularity and latency of units in ventral cochlear nucleus: implications for unit classification and generation of response properties. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  E. F. Evans,et al.  Pitch and Cochlear Nerve Fibre Temporal Discharge Patterns , 1938 .

[24]  R. Ritsma Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers , 1985, Hearing Research.

[26]  M. Liberman Central projections of auditory nerve fibers of differing spontaneous rate, II: Posteroventral and dorsal cochlear nuclei , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[28]  R. Plomp The Role of Modulation in Hearing , 1983 .

[29]  M. Sachs,et al.  Representation of stop consonants in the discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R. Plomp,et al.  Pitch, Timbre, and Hearing Theory , 1968 .

[31]  Raimond L. Winslow,et al.  A computational model for rate-level functions from cat auditory-nerve fibers , 1989, Hearing Research.

[32]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The ear as a speech analyzer , 1988 .

[33]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Responses of Cochlear Nucleus Neurons to Speech Signals: Neural Encoding of Pitch, Intensity and other Parameters , 1986 .

[34]  N. Kiang,et al.  Single unit activity in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[35]  Raphael Lorente De No,et al.  The Primary Acoustic Nuclei , 1981 .

[36]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  E. de Boer,et al.  On the “Residue” and Auditory Pitch Perception , 1976 .

[38]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  A R Møller Coding of time-varying sounds in the cochlear nucleus. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[40]  R Meddis,et al.  A computer model of a cochlear-nucleus stellate cell: responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  T. Yin,et al.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  E. Evans Cochlear Nerve Fibre Temporal Discharge Patterns, Cochlear Frequency Selectivity and the Dominant Region for Pitch , 1986 .

[43]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Auditory nerve spatial encoding of high-frequency pure tones: Population response profiles derived from d' measure associated with nearby places along the cochlea , 1991, Hearing Research.

[44]  R. Kay Hearing of modulation in sounds. , 1982, Physiological reviews.

[45]  I. Whitfield Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[46]  A J Houtsma,et al.  Pitch identification of simultaneous diotic and dichotic two-tone complexes. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: Analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum , 1990, Hearing Research.

[48]  M. Liberman Central projections of auditory‐nerve fibers of differing spontaneous rate. I. Anteroventral cochlear nucleus , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  A. Møller Dynamic properties of primary auditory fibers compared with cells in the cochlear nucleus. , 1976, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[50]  E. Evans,et al.  Intensity coding in the auditory periphery of the cat: Responses of cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in the presence of bandstop masking noise , 1982, Hearing Research.

[51]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the auditory system , 1992, Hearing Research.

[52]  Raimond L. Winslow,et al.  Some Aspects of Rate Coding in the Auditory Nerve , 1986 .

[53]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: II. Possible neural mechanisms , 1990, Hearing Research.

[54]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Response modulation of auditory-nerve fibers by am stimuli: effects of average intensity , 1980, Hearing Research.

[55]  Wolfgang Fuerst,et al.  Introductory digital signal processing with computer applications , 1989 .

[56]  J. W. Horst,et al.  Coding of spectral fine structure in the auditory nerve. I. Fourier analysis of period and interspike interval histograms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Physiological studies on neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of cat. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  E. F. Evans,et al.  The Dynamic Range Problem: Place and Time Coding at the Level of Cochlear Nerve and Nucleus , 1981 .

[59]  J E Hind,et al.  Some possible neural correlates of combination tones. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[60]  S. N. Jagannathan Handbook of Sensory Physiology: Auditory System , 1978 .

[61]  E. Evans Cochlear Nerve and Cochlear Nucleus , 1975 .

[62]  Kirsten K. Osen,et al.  Anatomy of the Mammalian Cochlear Nuclei; a Review , 1988 .

[63]  R. Gacek,et al.  The Primary Acoustic Nuclei , 1983 .

[64]  R. J. Ritsma,et al.  Frequency Selectivity and the Tonal Residue , 1974 .

[65]  E. Young,et al.  Similarity of dynamic range adjustment in auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Physiological response properties of cells labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase in cat dorsal cochlear nucleus , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[67]  B. L. Cardozo,et al.  Pitch of the Residue , 1962 .

[68]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Physiological response properties of cells labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase in cat ventral cochlear nucleus , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[69]  E. Rouiller,et al.  Intracellular marking of physiologically characterized cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[70]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  M. Sachs,et al.  Regularity analysis in a compartmental model of chopper units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.