The development of a framework for effective interdisciplinary behaviour change project management

Purpose: Interdisciplinary interventions for behaviour change are increasingly being considered a standard to aim for to maximise the potential for effective change of behaviours which have complex, multi-layered and interrelated causes. Despite considerable emphasis on interdisciplinarity in the behaviour change guidance (NICE, 2007; House of Lords, 2011), there is little research into the lived experience of managers attempting interdisciplinarity in day to day intervention management. This study sought to explore these experiences, with the aim of identifying a useful best practice framework for interdisciplinary intervention management. Methodology: Fourteen experts with extensive experience of managing or participating in interdisciplinary behaviour change projects were recruited for this project. They were recruited in pairs; each pair having worked on the same project but having come from a different background or discipline. The panel included academics as well as third, private and public sector practitioners. A range of behaviour change fields were included. Depth interviews were conducted to explore experiences of behaviour change projects and a draft ‘best practice’ framework was development from a thematic analysis of the findings. Through a series of iterations, the draft framework was amended, crosschecked and a subsequent consensus reached by the panel, from which the final version was developed. Findings: The result of this research project is an evidenced based framework for best practice in interdisciplinary behaviour change project management. The framework includes eight ‘best practice’ points which are broken down giving guidance for successful interdisciplinary intervention management: Implications: It has been emphasised that interdisciplinarity in behaviour change intervention planning and management is vital for the future success of work in the behaviour change field. However, it is known that interdisciplinarity is difficult to achieve and little work has been done to consider how it might be achieved in practice. Limitations: Although the framework is based on sound in-depth evidence, it is yet untested and future research will further refine its content. Contribution: It is hoped that this research forms the basis for future studies considering interdisciplinarity in behaviour change so the field might develop and strong positive outcomes be achieved.

[1]  R. Gordon Unlocking the potential of upstream social marketing , 2013 .

[2]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[3]  C. Abraham,et al.  A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[4]  A. Booth,et al.  Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work , 2013, Human Resources for Health.

[5]  Leon Eisenberg,et al.  Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences , 2000 .

[6]  P. Crawshaw Public health policy and the behavioural turn: The case of social marketing , 2013 .

[7]  Matthew Wood,et al.  Fresh ideas: services thinking for social marketing , 2013 .

[8]  Ken A. Dill,et al.  Strengthening biomedicine's roots , 1999, Nature.

[9]  Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin,et al.  Training the transdisciplinary scientist: a general framework applied to tobacco use behavior. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[10]  R. West Tobacco control: present and future. , 2006, British medical bulletin.

[11]  M. Johnston,et al.  From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques , 2008 .

[12]  W. Wulf,et al.  Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2008 .

[13]  Douglas K. Martin,et al.  Interdisciplinary research: putting the methods under the microscope , 2003, BMC medical research methodology.

[14]  J. Porter,et al.  Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity , 2003 .

[15]  Harold Wilhite,et al.  Making practice theory practicable: Towards more sustainable forms of consumption , 2014 .

[16]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Scientific Collaborations at a Distance , 2001, Science.

[17]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  ‘What do you mean?’ The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research , 2006 .

[18]  M. Wood Social Marketing for Social Change , 2016 .

[19]  J. French The nature, development and contribution of social marketing to public health practice since 2004 in England , 2009, Perspectives in public health.

[20]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Energy consumption and everyday life: Choice, values and agency through a practice theoretical lens , 2016 .

[21]  Gunilla Öberg,et al.  Facilitating interdisciplinary work: using quality assessment to create common ground , 2009 .

[22]  A Gafni,et al.  Developing a model of collaborative research: the complexities and challenges of implementation. , 2000, International journal of nursing studies.

[23]  Marcia G. Ory,et al.  Yours, Mine, and Ours: The Importance of Scientific Collaboration in Advancing the Field of Behavior Change Research , 2005, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[24]  J. Sallis,et al.  Ecological models of health behavior. , 2008 .

[25]  J B Martin,et al.  Breaking Down the Walls: Thoughts on the Scholarship of Integration , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[26]  R. West The Multiple Facets of Cigarette Addiction and What They Mean for Encouraging and Helping Smokers to Stop , 2009, COPD.

[27]  Kent E Hutchison,et al.  The Big Picture of Individual Differences in Physical Activity Behavior Change: A Transdisciplinary Approach. , 2011, Psychology of sport and exercise.

[28]  C. Orleans The behavior change consortium: expanding the boundaries and impact of health behavior change research , 2005, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[29]  Katharina Helming,et al.  A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management , 2013 .

[30]  S. Jebb,et al.  Foresight. Tackling obesities: future choices. Project report. , 2007 .

[31]  Moti Nissani Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research , 1997 .