Infants' Perception of Semantically Defined Action Role Changes in Filmed Events.

Many researchers (Brown, 1973; Edwards, 1973; Ervin-Tripp, 1971; Lenneberg, 1967; Macnamara, 1972; Wells, 1974) have argued that the acquisition of language is based on a cognitive nonlinguistic base made up of concepts, categories, and meanings. The cognitive relations constructed by the infant from sensori-motor interactions in the world are translated into language and appear as semantic rela tions in early multi-word, and perhaps even single-word, utterances (Bloom, 1970; Brown, 1973; Greenfield & Smith, 1976; Schlesinger, 1971). Schlesinger (1974) has written that there "seems to be no evidence for the psychological reality of any classification of these [cognitive] relations." However, some evidence for the psychological reality of one set of these relations does exist. With the habituation paradigm, preliminary attempts to operationalize the categories of "agent" and "recipient" have provided support for infants' discrimina tions of these relations in perceptual events (Gilmore, Suci, & Chan, 1974, Note 1; Golinkoff, 1975; McHale, 1973). "Agent" is defined as the animate actor initiating an action while "recipient" is the animate or inanimate receiver of the action. The agent-recipient distinction is fundamental in recent linguistic ac counts of the semantic units that underlie language processing (Chafe, 1970; Fillmore, 1968). Suci (1971, Note 2) has termed this dichotomy action role and his research (Suci & Hamacher, 1972) as well as others' (e.g., Shafto, 1973), has indicated that the.action role distinc tion is a psychologically significant aspect of sentence processing. The primary purpose of the present study was to examine infants'

[1]  E. Lenneberg Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[2]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[3]  M. Vihman Biological Foundations of Language. Eric B. Lenneberg , 1969 .

[4]  S. Goldberg,et al.  The acquisition and violation of expectancy: an experimental paradigm. , 1969, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[6]  R. Langacker,et al.  Meaning and the Structure of Language , 1972 .

[7]  L. Bloom Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars , 1970 .

[8]  H. H. Clark,et al.  The Semantics of Sentence Subjects , 1971, Language and speech.

[9]  R. Mccall,et al.  ATTENTION IN THE INFANT: AVENUE TO THE STUDY OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT1 , 1971 .

[10]  J. Macnamara Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. , 1972, Psychological review.

[11]  GEORGE J. SUCI,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF CASE IN SENTENCE PROCESSING: ACTION ROLE AND ANIMATENESS , 1972 .

[12]  Derek Edwards,et al.  Sensory-motor intelligence and semantic relations in early child grammar , 1973 .

[13]  R. Golinkoff Semantic Development in Infants: The Concepts of Agent and Recipient. , 1973 .

[14]  H. E. Howe,et al.  The aquisition of semantic restrictions in children , 1973 .

[15]  Michael Shafto,et al.  The space for case , 1973 .

[16]  R. Brown A First Language , 1973 .

[17]  K. Nelson,et al.  Structure and strategy in learning to talk. , 1973 .

[18]  Early development of concepts underlying language , 1974 .

[19]  John D. Bransford,et al.  A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: Some thoughts about understanding what it means to comprehend. , 1974 .

[20]  G. Wells Learning to code experience through language , 1974, Journal of Child Language.

[21]  Heart Rate Deceleration as a Function of Viewing Complex Visual Events in Eighteen-Month-Old Infants. , 1974 .

[22]  Ernst L. Moerk,et al.  Piaget's Research as Applied to the Explanation of Language Development. , 1975 .

[23]  J. Bruner The ontogenesis of speech acts , 1975, Journal of Child Language.