Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability: A Literature Review

Triple bottom line (TBL) and sustainability are two related constructs that are used interchangeably in the literature. A comprehensive review of the relevant literature was conducted and revealed an inconsistent use of the term sustainability. On the other hand, consistency in terms of referring to the three lines simultaneously is built into the structure of TBL as the construct is explicitly based on the integration of the social, environmental, and economic lines. The purpose of this paper is not to support an argument that favors the use of one term over the other, but to provide an overview of the presence of both terms in the literature. In light of that, researchers in the business, management, and sustainability fields are encouraged to pay particular attention to how they use these terms in their studies.

[1]  J. Spangenberg.  Economic sustainability of the economy: concepts and indicators , 2005 .

[2]  A. Stefan,et al.  Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview , 2008 .

[3]  Case Study on Sustainability: Accountants’ Role in Developing a New Business Model , 2010 .

[4]  P. Shrivastava,et al.  Greening organizations 2000 , 1994 .

[5]  Wei Yan,et al.  An investigation into sustainable product conceptualization using a design knowledge hierarchy and Hopfield network , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[6]  Anastasia Dewangga,et al.  Social Responsibility Guidelines a Sustainable Development : Integrating a Common Goal of a Sustainable Society , 2008 .

[7]  Adrian Henriques.  CSR, Sustainability and the Triple Bottom Line , 2013 .

[8]  Adam R. Fremeth,et al.  Green Management Matters Regardless , 2009 .

[9]  Adriana Rejc Buhovac,et al.  Making Sustainability Work : Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts , 2017 .

[10]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[11]  Bob Frame,et al.  Promoting Sustainability through Social Marketing: Examples from New Zealand , 2007 .

[12]  W. Filho,et al.  An analysis of the relationship between sustainable development and the anthroposystem concept , 2005 .

[13]  J. Elkington.  Cannibals with Forks , 1997 .

[14]  H. George.  Progress and poverty , 1879 .

[15]  C. MacDonald,et al.  Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line” , 2004, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[16]  L. Ho,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Triple Bottom-Line Reporting and its Determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan , 2007 .

[17]  G. R. Brundtland.  Our Common Future World Commission on Environment and Development , 1987 .

[18]  L. Steg,et al.  Customers' values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior , 2007 .

[19]  N. Hidayati.  Pattern of corporate social responsibility programs: a case study , 2011 .

[20]  Hanan A. Alhaddi,et al.  The Influence of Triple Bottom Line on Strategic Positioning: An Exploratory Case Study on Differentiation through Image , 2014 .

[21]  Andrew Savitz,et al.  The Triple Bottom Line: How Today's Best-Run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success -- and How You Can Too , 2006 .