Risk perception analysis of BOT road project participants in India

Despite massive investment opportunities and the establishment of a framework for private sector participation in highway infrastructure development programmes in India, private investment (including foreign direct investment) in this sector is not up to the expected level. A high degree of risk exposure, disagreement on many risk issues among major stakeholders, and the absence of adequate government guarantees have been identified as some of the major reasons for this lukewarm response. This paper discusses the outcome of a risk perception analysis carried out to evaluate the risk criticality, risk management capability, risk allocation/sharing preference, and factors influencing risk acceptance of major stakeholders. A survey was conducted among senior project participants such as government officials, promoters, lenders and consultants of Indian BOT road projects. Eight types of risks have been identified as very critical in the Indian road sector under BOT set up with traffic revenue risk being the most critical. Though there is fair agreement among survey respondents with respect to the risk management capabilities of stakeholders, their preferences of allocations are divergent. The significant factors influencing the risk acceptance of each stakeholder are identified through regression analysis. The study reveals that the factors and their relative influence on the risk acceptance of stakeholders are considerably different.

[1]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  Towards a framework for project risk knowledge management in the construction supply chain , 2001 .

[2]  G. Wu,et al.  Risk Assessment for Construction Joint Ventures in China , 2001 .

[3]  ShouQing Wang,et al.  Evaluation and Management of Political Risks in China's BOT Projects , 2000 .

[4]  Lee A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  A Simple Guide to SPSS for Windows: For Versions 8.0 and 9.0. , 2000 .

[5]  Antonio Estache,et al.  The Rise, the Fall, and . . . The Emerging Recovery of Project Finance in Transport , 1999 .

[6]  Li Bing,et al.  Risk management in international construction joint ventures , 1999 .

[7]  Antonio Estache,et al.  A Few Things Transport Regulators Should Know About Risk and the Cost of Capital , 1999 .

[8]  John A. Aloysius Risk aggregation and the efficient selection of joint projects by a consortium , 1999 .

[9]  G S Taunk,et al.  CONSTRUCTION OF UDAIPUR BYPASS ON DELHI-JAIPUR-UDAIPUR-AHMEDABAD N.H. NO. 8 THROUGH PRIVATE PARTICIPATION ON B.O.T. BASIS , 1998 .

[10]  Akintola Akintoye,et al.  Risk analysis and management of Private Finance Initiative projects , 1998 .

[11]  Elaine M. Hall,et al.  Managing Risk: Methods for Software Systems Development , 1998 .

[12]  A. Akintoye,et al.  Risk analysis and management in construction , 1997 .

[13]  David G Woodward Use of sensitivity analysis in build-own-operate-transfer project evaluation , 1995 .

[14]  Robert L. K. Tiong RISKS AND GUARANTEES IN BOT TENDER , 1995 .

[15]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[16]  Daniel B. Carr,et al.  Data analysis management , 1986 .