Responding to games development challenges through mood-mediated improvisation

This paper focuses on the process by which developers regulate their moods in volatile and creative contexts. By regulate, we mean the way in which developers rationalise and act upon their moods when they encounter and interpret unforeseen challenges. Little scholarly attention has been afforded to this process, nor the concept of mood per se in IS Development (ISD). To investigate this process we conducted an in-depth field study at a computer games development organisation in Singapore. We found that plan-driven methodologies offered limited guidance when unanticipated challenges emerged, i.e. when the development process broke down due to such disruptions as staff or stakeholder turnover. Instead, developers relied on their innate faculties of mood regulation and improvisation to overcome such challenges. We offer a theory of mood-mediated improvisation, which suggests incorporating sensemaking into ISD approaches with respect to positively influencing developers' interpretations of traumatic challenges to the ISD process.

[1]  R. Paul Review of "The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdoms of systems" by Claudio Ciborra, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002 , 2005 .

[2]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Greg Lastowka,et al.  The Laws of the Virtual Worlds , 2004 .

[4]  Bob Rehak Mapping the Bit Girl Lara Croft and new media fandom , 2003 .

[5]  D. Nutt,et al.  The Sims: Real Life as Genre , 2003 .

[6]  Stephen Fineman,et al.  Understanding emotion at work , 2003 .

[7]  Pervaiz K. Ahmed,et al.  Emotion: the missing part of systems methodologies , 2003 .

[8]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Positive and negative emotions in organizations. , 2003 .

[9]  J. Dutton,et al.  Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline , 2003 .

[10]  Helena Karsten,et al.  Review: Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2003 .

[11]  Anthony E. Cawkell The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems , 2002, J. Documentation.

[12]  Sarah J. Bailyn Who Makes the Rules? Using Wittgenstein in Social Theory , 2002 .

[13]  Russell B. Williams,et al.  Aggression, competition and computer games: computer and human opponents , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Jim Highsmith,et al.  Agile Software Development Ecosystems , 2002 .

[15]  Yasunori Baba,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN JAPANESE TV GAME SOFTWARE: THE CASE OF AN INNOVATIVE GAME , 2001 .

[16]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  Extreme Programming from a CMM Perspective , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[17]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Effects of intra‐group conflict on packaged software development team performance , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Helena Holström,et al.  Virtual Communities as Platforms for Product Development: An Interpretive Case Study of Customer Involvement in Online Game Development , 2001, ICIS.

[19]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[20]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods , 2000 .

[21]  David E. Avison,et al.  The fiction of methodological development: a field study of information systems development , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Notes on improvisation and time in organizations , 1999 .

[23]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Designing in the dark: the changing user-developer relationship in information systems development , 1997, ICIS '97.

[24]  Peter Aiken,et al.  Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1997 .

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  David Wastell,et al.  The fetish of technique: methodology as a social defence , 1996 .

[27]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  The Giddens Reader , 1993 .

[28]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Limits of the Knowable: Organizational and Design Knowledge in Systems Development , 1992, The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies in Information Systems Development.

[29]  Kent L. Beck,et al.  Extreme programming explained - embrace change , 1990 .

[30]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[31]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[32]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[33]  M. Rosaldo General and Theoretical: New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. Anthony Giddens. , 1979 .

[34]  E. Tiryakian,et al.  New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretive Sociologies.Anthony Giddens , 1978 .

[35]  A. Giddens,et al.  New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. , 1977 .