Radiation Dose Reduction Using a Novel Fluoroscopy System in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Invasive Coronary Angiography

Background: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) still causes a significant amount of radiation exposure for patients and operators. In February 2017, the Azurion system was introduced, a new-generation fluoroscopy image acquisition and processing system. Radiation exposure in patients undergoing ICA was assessed comparing the novel Azurion 7 F12 angiography system to its predecessor Allura Xper in a randomized manner. Methods: Radiation exposure was prospectively analyzed in 238 patients undergoing diagnostic ICA. Patients were randomly assigned to the novel Azurion system (119 patients) or its predecessor Allura Xper system (119 patients). In each patient, 8 predefined standard projections (5 left coronary artery, 3 right coronary artery) were performed. Image quality was quantified by grading of the images on the basis of a 5-point grading system. Results: Radiation dose area product was significantly lower in the Azurion group 109 (interquartile range [IQR 75-176] cGy cm2) compared with the Allura Xper group 208 [IQR 134-301] cGy cm2 (P<0.001). Body mass index (26.6 [IQR 23.9-29.7] kg/m2 vs. 26.2 [IQR 24.2-29.4] kg/m2; P=0.607), body surface area (1.96 [IQR 1.81-2.11] m2 vs. 1.90 [IQR 1.77-20.4] m2; P=0.092), and procedure duration (1.5 [IQR 1.2-2.3] min vs. 1.6 [IQR 1.2-2.5] min; P=0.419) were similar in both groups. Images from the Azurion system were at least of equal quality compared with Allura Xper (image quality grade 4.82±0.45 vs. 4.75±0.52, P=0.43). Conclusion: Use of the novel Azurion 7 F12 angiography system resulted in a significant reduction of dose area product in patients undergoing diagnostic ICA by 56%.

[1]  A. Hapfelmeier,et al.  Significant Radiation Dose Reduction Using a Novel Angiography Platform in Patients Undergoing Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation , 2019, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[2]  M. Eisenberg,et al.  Ionizing Radiation in Interventional Cardiology and Electrophysiology. , 2019, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[3]  D. Mukherjee,et al.  Efficacy of Low-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Radiation for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention (KAR RAD Study). , 2019, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[4]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Reducing Radiation Dose in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Using Image Noise Reduction Technology. , 2016, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  R. Ebrahimi,et al.  Effect of Low-Frame Invasive Coronary Angiography on Radiation and Image Quality. , 2016, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  E. Piccaluga,et al.  Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patient radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography , 2015, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[8]  Klaus Bacher,et al.  Novel X‐ray imaging technology enables significant patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology while maintaining diagnostic image quality , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  C. Sahyoun,et al.  Substantial radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease interventions with a novel X-ray imaging technology , 2015, International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature.

[10]  R. Mongrain,et al.  Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  Albert Meijer,et al.  New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[12]  D. Babic,et al.  Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. , 2013, Radiology.

[13]  Michael Söderman,et al.  Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients , 2013, Neuroradiology.

[14]  E. Picano,et al.  Radiation exposure as an occupational hazard. , 2012, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  B. Chow,et al.  Low-dose cardiac imaging: reducing exposure but not accuracy , 2012, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[16]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Methods for measuring fluoroscopic skin dose , 2006, Pediatric Radiology.

[17]  G. Panayiotakis,et al.  Radiation exposure of patients and coronary arteries in the stent era: A prospective study , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.