Road Capacity and the Allocation of Time

Additional highway capacity, by increasing travel speed, affects the individual share of time within a 24-hour budget allocated to various activities (time spent at and traveling to home, shop, work and other). Some activities will be undertaken more, others less. This paper extends previous research that identified and quantified induced demand in terms of vehicle miles traveled, by considering what type of demand is induced and which activities are consequently reduced, using the 1990 and 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey and Federal Highway Administration highway statistics data. While total travel times have not seen any significant change between the years 1990 and 1995, there is a significant change in activity durations. Further, as a result of additional capacity, workers spend less time traveling. Workers also spend more time at home and other activities and less at work and shop. Non-workers, in contrast, travel more, and spend more time shopping and at home, but less time at other activities. This points out the differences in discretionary and non-discretionary activities for workers and non-workers. It also suggests that there are real gains from capacity in people's lives, at least in the short term, as it is time, and not VMT, that individuals base decisions on.

[1]  L. Fulton,et al.  A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF INDUCED TRAVEL EFFECTS IN THE U.S. MID-ATLANTIC REGION , 2000 .

[2]  Seshasai Kanchi TIME USE AND CAPACITY EXPANSION , 2001 .

[3]  S. Jara-Díaz Allocation and Valuation of Travel-Time Savings , 2007 .

[4]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[5]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Analysis of Metropolitan Highway Capacity and the growth in vehicle miles of travel , 2000 .

[6]  D. Levinson,et al.  Density and the Journey to Work , 1997, Growth and change.

[7]  G. Davis,et al.  UNDERSTANDING URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND: PROBLEMS, SOLUTIONS, AND THE ROLE OF FORECASTING , 1999 .

[8]  David M Levinson,et al.  Temporal Variations on the Allocation of Time , 2008 .

[9]  Richard G Dowling,et al.  Effects of increased highway capacity : results of household travel behavior survey , 1998 .

[10]  J. Dunne,et al.  ELASTICITY MEASURES AND DISAGGREGATE CHOICE MODELS , 1984 .

[11]  P. McCarthy,et al.  THE ROLE OF CAPTIVITY IN AGGREGATE SHARE MODELS OF INTERCITY PASSENGER TRAVEL. IN: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRANSPORT ECONOMICS , 1997 .

[12]  D. Levinson,et al.  The Rational Locator: Why Travel Times Have Remained Stable , 1994 .

[13]  Lothlorien S. Redmond,et al.  The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount , 2001 .

[14]  Lawrence C. Barr,et al.  Testing for the Significance of Induced Highway Travel Demand in Metropolitan Areas , 2000 .

[15]  D. Levinson,et al.  Activity, Travel, and the Allocation of Time , 1995 .

[16]  R. Noland Relationships between highway capacity and induced vehicle travel , 2001 .

[17]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  THE SCHEDULING OF CONSUMER ACTIVITIES: WORK TRIPS , 1982 .

[18]  M. Hansen,et al.  Road supply and traffic in California urban areas , 1997 .

[19]  Phil. Goodwin,et al.  Empirical evidence on induced traffic , 1996 .