Self-organised complex aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model

Aerial displays of starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) at their communal roosts are complex: thousands of individuals form multiple flocks which are continually changing shape and density, while splitting and merging. To understand these complex displays both empirical data and models are needed. Whereas detailed empirical data were recently collected through video recordings and position measurements by stereo photography of flocks of thousands of starlings, there are as yet no models that generate these complex patterns. Numerous computer models in biology, however, suggest that patterns of single groups of moving animals may emerge by self-organisation from movement and local coordination (through attraction, alignment and avoidance of collision). In this paper, we investigated whether this approach can be extended to generate patterns resembling these aerial displays of starlings. We show in a model that to generate many of the patterns measured empirically in real starlings we have to extend the usual rules of local coordination with specifics of starling behaviour, mainly 1) their aerial locomotion, 2) a low and constant number of interaction-partners and 3) preferential movement above a roosting area. Our model can be used as a tool for the study of these displays, because it provides new integrative hypotheses about the mechanisms underlying these displays and of swarming patterns in biological systems in general.

[1]  E. Selous Thought Transference (or What ?) in Birds , 1932, Nature.

[2]  C. Breder Equations Descriptive of Fish Schools and Other Animal Aggregations , 1954 .

[3]  M. Keenleyside,et al.  Some Aspects of the Schooling Behaviour of Fish , 1955 .

[4]  G. C. Rider,et al.  Radar ring angels and the roosting behaviour of starlings , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  I. J. Patterson,et al.  Ecological Studies of the Rook (Corvus frugilegus L.) in North-East Scotland. Proportion and Distribution of Young in the Population , 1969 .

[6]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[7]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  I. J. Patterson,et al.  Ecological Studies of the Rook, Corvus frugilegus L., in North-East Scotland. Dispersion , 1971 .

[9]  J. R. Nursall Some Behavioral Interactions of Spottail Shiners (Notropis hudsonius), Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens), and Northern Pike (Esox lucius) , 1973 .

[10]  Foraging Behavior of the Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) in Maryland , 1975 .

[11]  F. Heppner,et al.  Laboratory determination of startle reaction time of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  B. Partridge The effect of school size on the structure and dynamics of minnow schools , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Sokal Rr,et al.  Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 2nd edition. , 1981 .

[14]  W. Foster,et al.  Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: The trafalgar effect , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  W. Potts The chorus-line hypothesis of manoeuvre coordination in avian flocks , 1984, Nature.

[16]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[17]  U. Norberg Vertebrate Flight: Mechanics, Physiology, Morphology, Ecology and Evolution , 1990 .

[18]  F. Heppner,et al.  Structure of Turning in Airborne Rock Dove (Columba livia) Flocks , 1992 .

[19]  C. Handel,et al.  Roosting behavior of premigratory Dunlins (Calidris alpina) , 1992 .

[20]  Andreas Huth,et al.  THE SIMULATION OF FISH SCHOOLS IN COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994 .

[21]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Self-Structuring in Artificial "Chimps" Offers New Hypotheses for Male Grouping in Chimpanzees , 1994 .

[22]  Hauke Reuter,et al.  SELFORGANIZATION OF FISH SCHOOLS : AN OBJECT-ORIENTED MODEL , 1994 .

[23]  W. L. Romey Individual differences make a difference in the trajectories of simulated schools of fish , 1996 .

[24]  Jens Krause,et al.  Mortality risk of spatial positions in animal groups: The danger of being in the front , 1997 .

[25]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Coherent moving states in highway traffic , 1998, Nature.

[26]  Sariel Har-Peled,et al.  Efficiently approximating the minimum-volume bounding box of a point set in three dimensions , 1999, SODA '99.

[27]  S. Gauthreaux,et al.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF A PURPLE MARTIN PRE-MIGRATORY ROOST , 1999 .

[28]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[29]  G. Beauchamp The evolution of communal roosting in birds: origin and secondary losses , 1999 .

[30]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[31]  H Pashler,et al.  How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[32]  Viable and unviable hypotheses for the evolution of raven roosts , 2001 .

[33]  Neha Bhooshan,et al.  The Simulation of the Movement of Fish Schools , 2001 .

[34]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  George N. Reeke,et al.  BOOK REVIEW: "SELF-ORGANIZATION IN BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS" BY S. CAMAZINE, J. DENEUBOURG, N. R. FRANKS, J. SNEYD, G. THERAULAZ AND E. BONABEAU , 2002 .

[36]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  C. Hemelrijk Understanding Social Behaviour with the Help of Complexity Science (Invited Article) , 2002 .

[38]  Ihor Lubashevsky,et al.  Bounded rational driver models , 2003 .

[39]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Artificial Fish Schools: Collective Effects of School Size, Body Size, and Body Form , 2003, Artificial Life.

[40]  W. Nachtigall,et al.  Metabolic power of European starlings Sturnus vulgaris during flight in a wind tunnel, estimated from heat transfer modelling, doubly labelled water and mask respirometry , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[41]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of fish schools , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  W. L. Romey Position preferences within groups: do whirligigs select positions which balance feeding opportunities with predator avoidance? , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions , 2004, Nature.

[44]  L. Dill,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of airborne bird flocks , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  C. Hemelrijk Self-organisation and evolution of social systems , 2005 .

[46]  Julia K. Parrish,et al.  Self-Organisation and Evolution of Social Systems: Traffic rules of fish schools: a review of agent-based approaches , 2005 .

[47]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[48]  T Kambara,et al.  Behavior pattern (innate action) of individuals in fish schools generating efficient collective evasion from predation. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  Schlagflug des Stars (Sturnus vulgaris) im Windkanal mit und ohne respiratorische Maske: Kinematik, Aerodynamik und Energetik , 2005 .

[50]  C. K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Individual variation by self-organisation , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[51]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[52]  P. Clergeau Flocking behaviour of Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) during the day: A gradual gathering to the roost , 1990, Journal für Ornithologie.

[53]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model , 2005 .

[54]  Lubos Buzna,et al.  Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[55]  José Halloy,et al.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  Waves of agitation inside anchovy schools observed with multibeam sonar: a way to transmit information in response to predation , 2006 .

[57]  Christophe Becco,et al.  Experimental evidences of a structural and dynamical transition in fish school , 2006 .

[58]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[59]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Initiating a Mexican Wave: An Instantaneous Collective Decision With Both Short and Long Range Interactions , 2006, physics/0601181.

[60]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing , 2006, Current Biology.

[61]  K. Dial Avian Flight , 2006 .

[62]  The flight behaviour of Starlings at a winter roost , 2007 .

[63]  J. O’Halloran,et al.  Time of roosting of Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica at an Irish reedbed during autumn migration , 2007 .

[64]  L. Gurr COMMUNAL ROOSTING BEHAVIOUR OF THE AUSTRALASIAN HARRIER CIRCUS APPROXIMANS IN NEW ZEALAND , 2008 .

[65]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  The STARFLAG handbook on collective animal behaviour: 2. Three-dimensional analysis , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools , 2008 .

[67]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism , 2008, PloS one.

[68]  G. Kastberger,et al.  Social Waves in Giant Honeybees Repel Hornets , 2008, PloS one.

[69]  G. Parisi,et al.  The STARFLAG handbook on collective animal behaviour: Part II, three-dimensional analysis , 2008, 0802.1674.

[70]  G. Parisi,et al.  Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  The STARFLAG handbook on collective animal behaviour: 1. Empirical methods , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[72]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  THE FUNCTION OF COMMUNAL ROOSTS: RELEVANCE OF MIXED ROOSTS , 2008 .

[74]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Ivan Puga-Gonzalez,et al.  Emergent Patterns of Social Affiliation in Primates, a Model , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[76]  Flavia Chiarotti,et al.  Aerial flocking patterns of wintering starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, under different predation risk , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Emergence of Oblong School Shape: Models and Empirical Data of Fish , 2010 .