Personalised learning: lessons to be learnt

Personalised learning is now broadly endorsed as a key strategy to improve student curricular engagement and academic attainment, but there is also strong critique of this construct. We review claims made for this approach, as well as concerns about its conceptual coherence and effects on different learner cohorts. Drawing on literature around differentiation of the curriculum, self-regulated learning, and ‘relational agency’ we propose a framework for conceptualising and enacting this construct. We then report on an attempt to introduce personalised learning as one strategy, among several, to improve student academic performance and wellbeing in four low SES regional secondary schools in Australia. We report on a survey of 2407 students’ perceptions of the extent to which their school provided a personalised learning environment, and a case study of a programme within one school that aimed to apply a personalised approach to the mathematics curriculum. We found that while there were ongoing challenges in this approach, there was also evidence of success in the mathematics case.

[1]  Susan Hart Tutor.  Differentiation. Part of the problem or part of the solution , 1992 .

[2]  Catherine Needham,et al.  Personalization: From Story‐line to Practice , 2011 .

[3]  Wendy Drexler,et al.  The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy , 2010 .

[4]  Jonothan Neelands,et al.  PERSONALISED LEARNING: AMBIGUITIES IN THEORY AND PRACTICE , 2007 .

[5]  J. Pykett.  Personalization and de-schooling: Uncommon trajectories in contemporary education policy , 2009 .

[6]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  Teach Me, Teach My Brain: A Call for Differentiated Classrooms. , 1998 .

[7]  Pearl Subban,et al.  Differentiated Instruction: A Research Basis. , 2006 .

[8]  David Hartley,et al.  EDUCATION, MARKETS AND THE PEDAGOGY OF PERSONALISATION , 2008 .

[9]  N. Denzin,et al.  Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials , 2012 .

[10]  Jay McTighe,et al.  Differentiated Instruction and Educational Standards: Is Detente Possible? , 2005 .

[11]  G. Myrdal,et al.  Against the Stream: Critical Essays on Economics , 1973 .

[12]  Families..  Department for Children, Schools and Families , 2007 .

[13]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[14]  Eleftheria N. Gonida,et al.  Perceptions of parent goals and their contribution to student achievement goal orientation and engagement in the classroom: Grade-level differences across adolescence , 2007 .

[15]  Thurston Domina,et al.  Mathematics Curricular Intensification and Inequality in American High Schools, 1982-2004 , 2011 .

[16]  B. Zimmerman.  Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[17]  Identifying exemplary science teachers through their students’ perceptions of the assessment process , 2009 .

[18]  G. Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by Design , 1998 .

[19]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[20]  R. Azevedo,et al.  A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin’s Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions , 2007 .

[21]  M. Fisher,et al.  Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. , 2001, Nurse education today.

[22]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  Grading and Differentiation: Paradox or Good Practice? , 2005 .

[23]  R. Marzano.  Building Background Knowledge for Academic Achievement: Research on What Works in Schools , 2004 .

[24]  L. Saunders,et al.  Differentiation in practice: responding to the needs of all pupils , 1993 .

[25]  Marianne Dovemark,et al.  Making Right Choices: an Ethnographic Investigation of Creativity and Performativity in Four Swedish Schools , 2009 .

[26]  B. Hout-Wolters,et al.  Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations , 2006 .

[27]  Anne Edwards,et al.  Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner , 2005 .

[28]  Anne Edwards,et al.  Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise , 2011 .

[29]  Matthew T. Marino,et al.  Universal Design for Learning and Assistive Technology: Leadership Considerations for Promoting Inclusive Education in Today’s Secondary Schools , 2010 .

[30]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Personalised and Self Regulated Learning in the Web 2.0 Era: International Exemplars of Innovative Pedagogy Using Social Software. , 2010 .

[31]  C. Leadbeater.  Personalisation and de-schooling : uncommon trajectories in contemporary education policy , 2010 .

[32]  P. Pintrich.  A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students , 2004 .

[33]  M. Fielding.  Leadership, personalization and high performance schooling: naming the new totalitarianism , 2006 .

[34]  Peter Charles Taylor,et al.  Classroom learning environments under transformation: A constructivist perspective , 1995 .

[35]  Judy Sebba,et al.  An Investigation of Personalised Learning Approaches Used by Schools , 2007 .

[36]  C. Tomlinson,et al.  Differentiation in practice , 2003 .

[37]  Y. Rosseel,et al.  Student Perception As Moderator For Student Wellbeing , 2007 .

[38]  B. Zimmerman.  Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview , 2002 .

[39]  M. Boekaerts,et al.  How Far Have We Moved Toward the Integration of Theory and Practice in Self-Regulation? , 2006 .

[40]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Classroom Learning Environments , 2003 .

[41]  A. Aelterman,et al.  Factors which influence the well-being of pupils in flemish secondary schools , 2004 .

[42]  Anne Edwards,et al.  Relational Agency in Professional Practice: A CHAT Analysis , 2007 .

[43]  David Hartley,et al.  Personalisation: the nostalgic revival of child‐centred education? , 2009 .

[44]  M. Boekaerts,et al.  Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention , 2005 .

[45]  T. Cutler,et al.  A NEW EPOCH OF INDIVIDUALIZATION? PROBLEMS WITH THE ‘PERSONALIZATION’ OF PUBLIC SECTOR SERVICES , 2007 .

[46]  Marianne Dovemark,et al.  Making ‘right’ choices? An ethnographic account of creativity, performativity and personalised learning policy, concepts and practices , 2009 .

[47]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms , 1995 .

[48]  P. Pintrich.  The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing , 2002 .

[49]  R. W. Strong,et al.  Making Students as Important as Standards. , 2001 .

[50]  John Blanchard,et al.  Teaching Learning and Assessment , 2009 .

[51]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[52]  Tonya R. Moon,et al.  Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature , 2003 .

[53]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[54]  Elizabeth Birr Moje,et al.  Chapter 1 Developing Socially Just Subject-Matter Instruction: A Review of the Literature on Disciplinary Literacy Teaching , 2007 .

[55]  K. Duckworth,et al.  Self-regulated learning: a literature review. [Wider Benefits of Learning Research Report No. 33] , 2009 .

[56]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[57]  Jay McTighe,et al.  Understanding by Design: Professional Development Workbook , 2004 .

[58]  Michael Fielding,et al.  'New wave' student voice and the renewal of civic society , 2004 .

[59]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  The Differentiated Classroom: Responding the Needs of All Learners , 1999 .