Underlining Performance Outcomes in Expository Text.

ABSTRACTUnderlining is the most popular of the active response study strategies. Unfortunately, research efforts of study strategies do not fully explain this popularity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate one possible reason for the popularity of underlining, namely, test performance outcomes anticipated by students from underlining. Two 2×3 A NOV As were used in a study, review, and test paradigm that investigated underlining performance outcomes with college students. The ANOVA’s used two levels of study time and three levels of reading achievement as the independent variables. The dependent variable in both analyses was number correct on a probed-recall test over the contents of a Scientific American reprint. Results suggest that regardless of study time and reading achievement, underlining is popular because it helps to ensure recall of information from underlined text segments.

[1]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Capturing Readers' Attention by Means of Typographical Cuing Strategies. , 1978 .

[2]  John P. Rickards Notetaking, Underlining, Inserted Questions, and Organizers in Text: Research Conclusions and Educational Implications. , 1980 .

[3]  Francis J. Di Vesta,et al.  Listening and Note Taking: II. Immediate and Delayed Recall as Functions of Variations in Thematic Continuity, Note Taking, and Length of Listening-Review Intervals. , 1973 .

[4]  R. Mayer,et al.  Generative Effects of Note-Taking during Science Lectures. , 1986 .

[5]  R. Fowler,et al.  Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material. , 1974 .

[6]  Susanne Askwall,et al.  Computer Supported Reading vs Reading Text on Paper: A Comparison of Two Reading Situations , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  Linda F. Annis,et al.  Study Techniques and Cognitive Style: Their Effect on Recall and Recognition. , 1978 .

[8]  F. di Vesta,et al.  Listening and note taking. , 1972, Journal of educational psychology.

[9]  Frank H. Heppner,et al.  Reading Performance on a Standardized Test is Better from Print than from Computer Display. , 1985 .

[10]  Jay Blanchard An Investigation of Computer-Based Mathemagenic Activities. , 1985 .

[11]  T. Gary Waller,et al.  Mathemagenic Behaviours and Efficiency in Learning from Prose Materials: Review, Critique and Recommendations , 1976 .

[12]  Harvey A. Taub,et al.  UNDERLINING OF PROSE MATERIAL FOR ELDERLY ADULTS , 1984 .

[13]  Wilfred J. Hansen,et al.  Why an Examination Was Slower On-Line than On Paper. , 1978 .

[14]  Gerald J. August,et al.  Generative underlining strategies in prose recall. , 1975 .

[15]  Joseph R. Jenkins,et al.  Underlining versus repetitive reading. , 1972 .

[16]  Woodburn Heron,et al.  The pathology of boredom. , 1957 .

[17]  M. Morgan Reward-Induced Decrements and Increments in Intrinsic Motivation , 1984 .

[18]  Kalmer E. Stordahl,et al.  The Effect of Study Techniques on Comprehension and Retention , 1956 .

[19]  David C. Slawson,et al.  Comparison and equating of paper - administered, computer - administered and computerized adaptive t , 1986 .

[20]  Gary M. Schumacher,et al.  Effects of Motivation, Subject Activity, and Readability on the Retention of Prose Materials. , 1978 .

[21]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[22]  Allen L. Edwards,et al.  Experimental Design in Psychological Research. , 1951 .

[23]  James H. Crouse,et al.  Effects of Encoding Cues on Prose Learning. , 1972 .

[24]  H. Scheffé A METHOD FOR JUDGING ALL CONTRASTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE , 1953 .

[25]  Peter W. Hoon Efficacy of Three Common Study Methods , 1974 .

[26]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens , 1982 .

[27]  U. Bronfenbrenner The Experimental Ecology of Education1 , 1976 .

[28]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Note-Taking and Passage Style. , 1981 .

[29]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[30]  Barton B. Proger,et al.  Advance and Concurrent Organizers for Detailed Verbal Passages Used with Elementary School Pupils. , 1973 .