Mobile platform for rapid sub–picogram-per-milliliter, multiplexed, digital droplet detection of proteins

Significance Digital assays have enormous untapped potential for diagnostics, environmental surveillance, and biosafety monitoring, but are currently confined to laboratory settings due to the instrumentation necessary to generate, control, and measure millions of droplets. We instead use a mobile phone-based imaging technique that is >100× faster than conventional microfluidic droplet detection, does not require expensive optics, is invariant to flow rate, and can simultaneously measure multiple fluorescent dyes in droplets. By using this time domain modulation with cloud computing, we overcome the low frame rate of digital imaging, and achieve throughputs as high as 1 million droplets per second. We integrate on-chip delay lines and a microbead processing unit, resulting in a robust device, suitable for low-cost implementation, with ultrasensitive measurement capabilities. Digital droplet assays—in which biological samples are compartmentalized into millions of femtoliter-volume droplets and interrogated individually—have generated enormous enthusiasm for their ability to detect biomarkers with single-molecule sensitivity. These assays have untapped potential for point-of-care diagnostics but are currently mainly confined to laboratory settings, due to the instrumentation necessary to serially generate, control, and measure tens of millions of droplets/compartments. To address this challenge, we developed an optofluidic platform that miniaturizes digital assays into a mobile format by parallelizing their operation. This technology is based on three key innovations: (i) the integration and parallel operation of a hundred droplet generators onto a single chip that operates >100× faster than a single droplet generator, (ii) the fluorescence detection of droplets at >100× faster than conventional in-flow detection using time domain-encoded mobile phone imaging, and (iii) the integration of on-chip delay lines and sample processing to allow serum-to-answer device operation. To demonstrate the power of this approach, we performed a duplex digital ELISA. We characterized the performance of this assay by first using spiked recombinant proteins in a complex media (FBS) and measured a limit of detection, 0.004 pg/mL (300 aM), a 1,000× improvement over standard ELISA and matching that of the existing laboratory-based gold standard digital ELISA system. We additionally measured endogenous GM-CSF and IL6 in human serum from n = 14 human subjects using our mobile duplex assay, and showed excellent agreement with the gold standard system (R2=0.96).

[1]  Peter Kiesel,et al.  Time encoded multicolor fluorescence detection in a microfluidic flow cytometer. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[2]  Sindy K. Y. Tang,et al.  Optofluidic ultrahigh-throughput detection of fluorescent drops. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Size-based sorting of hydrogel droplets using inertial microfluidics. , 2018, Lab on a chip.

[4]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Scaling by shrinking: empowering single-cell 'omics' with microfluidic devices , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[5]  L. Mazutis,et al.  Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[6]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Single-Exosome-Counting Immunoassays for Cancer Diagnostics. , 2018, Nano letters.

[7]  David M. Rissin,et al.  Single-Molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Rustem F Ismagilov,et al.  Digital PCR on a SlipChip. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[9]  David R Walt,et al.  Digital readout of target binding with attomole detection limits via enzyme amplification in femtoliter arrays. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Sydney M. Shaffer,et al.  Multiplexed detection of viral infections using rapid in situ RNA analysis on a chip. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[11]  Bawul Kim,et al.  Miniaturized, multiplexed readout of droplet-based microfluidic assays using time-domain modulation. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[12]  D. Weitz,et al.  Dripping to jetting transitions in coflowing liquid streams. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[13]  Mustafa Khammash,et al.  Digital Quantification of Proteins and mRNA in Single Mammalian Cells. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[14]  Adam R Ferguson,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Multiplex Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Four Clinically Relevant Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers. , 2019, Journal of neurotrauma.

[15]  A. Lee,et al.  1-Million droplet array with wide-field fluorescence imaging for digital PCR. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[16]  Hiroyuki Noji,et al.  A single-molecule digital enzyme assay using alkaline phosphatase with a cumarin-based fluorogenic substrate. , 2015, The Analyst.

[17]  Zhi Zhu,et al.  A highly parallel microfluidic droplet method enabling single-molecule counting for digital enzyme detection. , 2014, Biomicrofluidics.

[18]  Christopher M. Hindson,et al.  Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR , 2013, Nature Methods.

[19]  David H Wilson,et al.  The Simoa HD-1 Analyzer , 2016, Journal of laboratory automation.

[20]  Boris Murmann,et al.  Matrix-insensitive protein assays push the limits of biosensors in medicine , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[21]  I. Mezić,et al.  Chaotic Mixer for Microchannels , 2002, Science.

[22]  D. Issadore,et al.  Multicolor detection of fluorescent droplets on a cell phone using time domain encoded optofluidics , 2017, 2017 IEEE Healthcare Innovations and Point of Care Technologies (HI-POCT).

[23]  David H Wilson,et al.  Simple diffusion-constrained immunoassay for p24 protein with the sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification for detecting acute HIV infection. , 2013, Journal of virological methods.

[24]  S. Dunbar,et al.  Quantitative, multiplexed detection of bacterial pathogens: DNA and protein applications of the Luminex LabMAP system. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[25]  A. Jeromin,et al.  Peripheral Total Tau in Military Personnel Who Sustain Traumatic Brain Injuries During Deployment. , 2015, JAMA neurology.

[26]  M. Albert,et al.  Ultrasensitive HIV-1 p24 Assay Detects Single Infected Cells and Differences in Reservoir Induction by Latency Reversal Agents , 2017, Journal of Virology.

[27]  J. Lammertyn,et al.  Bioassay Development for Ultrasensitive Detection of Influenza A Nucleoprotein Using Digital ELISA. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  William McGuigan,et al.  The optics inside an automated single molecule array analyzer , 2014, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[29]  Christoph A. Merten,et al.  Single-Cell Droplet Microfluidic Screening for Antibodies Specifically Binding to Target Cells , 2018, Cell reports.

[30]  David M. Rissin,et al.  Polymerase-free measurement of microRNA-122 with single base specificity using single molecule arrays: Detection of drug-induced liver injury , 2017, PloS one.

[31]  M Muluneh,et al.  Hybrid soft-lithography/laser machined microchips for the parallel generation of droplets. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[32]  David R Walt,et al.  Single molecule array (Simoa) assay with optimal antibody pairs for cytokine detection in human serum samples. , 2015, The Analyst.

[33]  H. Shao,et al.  Exosome-templated nanoplasmonics for multiparametric molecular profiling , 2020, Science Advances.

[34]  D. Issadore,et al.  Silicon and glass very large scale microfluidic droplet integration for terascale generation of polymer microparticles , 2018, Nature Communications.

[35]  Rohan T Ranasinghe,et al.  Ultrarapid generation of femtoliter microfluidic droplets for single-molecule-counting immunoassays. , 2013, ACS nano.

[36]  M. Brenner,et al.  Robust scalable high throughput production of monodisperse drops. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[37]  A. Abate,et al.  Ultrahigh-throughput Mammalian single-cell reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in microfluidic drops. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[38]  Y. Lévy,et al.  CD32a is a marker of a CD4 T-cell HIV reservoir harbouring replication-competent proviruses , 2017, Nature.

[39]  Jeff Mellen,et al.  High-Throughput Droplet Digital PCR System for Absolute Quantitation of DNA Copy Number , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[40]  David Issadore,et al.  Kilo-scale droplet generation in three-dimensional monolithic elastomer device (3D MED). , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[41]  S. Moore,et al.  Use of high-sensitivity digital ELISA improves the diagnostic performance of circulating brain-specific proteins for detection of traumatic brain injury during triage , 2020, Neurological research.

[42]  David Issadore,et al.  Ultra-high throughput detection (1 million droplets per second) of fluorescent droplets using a cell phone camera and time domain encoded optofluidics. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[43]  Po-Ling Loh,et al.  Machine learning to detect signatures of disease in liquid biopsies - a user's guide. , 2018, Lab on a chip.

[44]  Bingwen Yu,et al.  Digital PCR on an integrated self-priming compartmentalization chip. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[45]  D. Weitz,et al.  Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[46]  L. Fu,et al.  Microfluidic Mixing: A Review , 2011, International journal of molecular sciences.

[47]  Bernhard H. Weigl,et al.  Design and Rapid Prototyping of Thin-Film Laminate-Based Microfluidic Devices , 2001 .

[48]  Yunfeng Ling,et al.  Multiplexed target detection using DNA-binding dye chemistry in droplet digital PCR. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[49]  A. Abate,et al.  Identification and genetic analysis of cancer cells with PCR-activated cell sorting , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[50]  Magalie Faivre,et al.  Microfluidic flow focusing: Drop size and scaling in pressure versus flow‐rate‐driven pumping , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[51]  David R. Walt,et al.  Ultra-sensitive protein detection via Single Molecule Arrays towards early stage cancer monitoring , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[52]  D. Issadore,et al.  Combining Machine Learning and Nanofluidic Technology To Diagnose Pancreatic Cancer Using Exosomes. , 2017, ACS nano.

[53]  F. MacWilliams,et al.  Pseudo-random sequences and arrays , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.