Phase transitions in social impact models of opinion formation

We study phase transitions in models of opinion formation which are based on the social impact theory. Two different models are discussed: (i) a cellular-automata-based model of a finite group with a strong leader where persons can change their opinions but not their spatial positions, and (ii) a model with persons treated as active Brownian particles interacting via a communication field. In the first model, two stable phases are possible: a cluster around the leader, and a state of social unification. The transition into the second state occurs for a large leader strength and/or for a high level of social noise. In the second model, we find three stable phases, which correspond either to a “paramagnetic” phase (for high noise and strong diffusion), a “ferromagnetic” phase (for small nose and weak diffusion), or a phase with spatially separated “domains” (for intermediate conditions).

[1]  H. Haken,et al.  Synergetics , 1988, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine.

[2]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Active brownian particles: Artificial agents in physics , 1997 .

[3]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[4]  Dariusz Plewczynski,et al.  Landau theory of social clustering , 1998 .

[5]  Edward L. Fink,et al.  Dynamic Social Impact Theory and the Study of Human Communication , 1996 .

[6]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  D. Helbing.  A Mathematical Model for the Behavior of Individuals in a Social Field , 1994, cond-mat/9805194.

[8]  Eve Passerini,et al.  Statistical mechanics of opinion formation and collective behavior: Micro‐sociology , 1998 .

[9]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Dynamical Systems in Social Psychology , 1994 .

[10]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics - Some Introductory , 1997 .

[11]  D. Sornette,et al.  Self-organized percolation model for stock market fluctuations , 1999, cond-mat/9906434.

[12]  Dirk Helbing.  Stochastic and Boltzmann-like models for behavioral changes, and their relation to game theory , 1993 .

[13]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  K. Kacperski,et al.  Phase transitions and hysteresis in a cellular automata-based model of opinion formation , 1996 .

[15]  Physics Letters , 1962, Nature.

[16]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[17]  S. Galam.  Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0 , 1997, cond-mat/9702163.

[18]  Wolfgang Weidlich.  Synergetic modelling concepts for sociodynamics with application to collective political opinion formation , 1994 .

[19]  W. Ebeling,et al.  Active Brownian particles with energy depots modeling animal mobility. , 1999, Bio Systems.

[20]  B. Latané,et al.  Statistical mechanics of social impact. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[21]  E. Mare.  I. Introduction , 1976 .

[22]  K. Kacperski,et al.  Opinion formation model with strong leader and external impact: a mean field approach , 1999 .

[23]  G. Cowan,et al.  Complexity Metaphors, Models, and Reality , 1994 .

[24]  Werner Ebeling,et al.  Complex Motion of Brownian Particles with Energy Depots , 1998 .

[25]  Lutz Schimansky-Geier,et al.  Structure formation by active Brownian particles , 1995 .

[26]  Kenneth Nyberg,et al.  Sociology , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.