Prospect Theory and International Relations: Theoretical Applications and Analytical Problems

In this essay I evaluate the potential contribution of prospect theory to our understanding of international relations. I begin with the implications of loss aversion, the endowment effect, risk orientation, and framing for theoretical questions relating to the stability of the status quo in international politics, deterrence, bargaining, and preventive war. I then raise conceptual and methodological problems which complicate the theoretical and empirical application of prospect theory to international behavior. I illustrate my arguments with references to some recent attempts to use a prospect theory framework to guide case studies of crises decision-making. I conclude that in applying prospect theory to empirical cases, the analyst must demonstrate not only that empirical behavior is consistent with the theory but also that the observed behavior cannot adequately be explained by a rational choice model which posits the maximization of expected value.

[1]  R. Abelson Decision making and decision theory , 1985 .

[2]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[3]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Risk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses , 1980 .

[4]  Patrick M. Morgan,et al.  Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis , 1983 .

[5]  John W. Payne,et al.  Note-Further Tests of Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior , 1981 .

[6]  C. Lemercier‐Quelquejay The USSR and the Middle East , 1982 .

[7]  Jack S. Levy,et al.  An introduction to prospect theory , 1992 .

[8]  Audrey McInerney Prospect theory and Soviet policy towards Syria, 1966-1967 , 1992 .

[9]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[10]  J. C. Campbell,et al.  Soviet Risk-Taking and Crisis Behavior , 1982 .

[11]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  Robert Jervis,et al.  Political Implications of Loss Aversion , 1992 .

[14]  I. Lakatos Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[15]  Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  The War Trap , 1981 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Variants of uncertainty , 1982, Cognition.

[17]  R. Jervis War and Misperception , 1988 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Midlarsky On War: Political Violence in the International System , 1975 .

[20]  Michael J. Doane,et al.  Consumer Rationality and the Status Quo , 1991 .

[21]  R. Jessop Why Men Rebel , 1971 .

[22]  R. Jervis Perception and misperception in international politics , 1976 .

[23]  Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  The War Trap Revisited: A Revised Expected Utility Model , 1985 .

[24]  D. G. Pruitt Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. , 1971 .

[25]  P. Fishburn,et al.  TWO‐PIECE VON NEUMANN‐MORGENSTERN UTILITY FUNCTIONS* , 1979 .

[26]  G. Constantinides The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence: Discussion , 1985 .

[27]  Barbara Farnham Roosevelt and the Munich Crisis: Insights from Prospect Theory , 1992 .

[28]  R. Thaler Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[29]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[30]  Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov,et al.  Avoiding War: Problems Of Crisis Management , 1991 .

[31]  D. S. Bennett,et al.  System Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict among the Great Powers , 1992 .

[32]  D. E. Bell,et al.  Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. , 1990 .

[33]  M. Bazerman Negotiator Judgment , 1983 .

[34]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  Framing the National Interest: The Manipulation of Foreign Policy Decisions in Group Settings , 1990, World Politics.

[35]  J. Levy Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems , 1983, World Politics.

[36]  T. Broadbent,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge , 1972 .

[37]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[38]  J. Levy Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War , 1987, World Politics.

[39]  S E Fienberg,et al.  Risk preferences for gains and losses in multiple objective decision making , 1986 .

[40]  P. Slovic,et al.  Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective , 1983 .

[41]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[42]  R. Robertson,et al.  The Process of Political Decision-Making in Groups , 1976 .

[43]  J. D. Morrow On the Theoretical Basis of a Measure of National Risk Attitudes , 1987 .

[44]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[45]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[46]  C. Hempel Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[47]  이병도 [국제정치] After Hegemony , 1994 .

[48]  P. Schoemaker Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis , 1980 .

[49]  J. Galtung A Structural Theory of Aggression , 1964 .

[50]  J. A. Sinden,et al.  The Persistence of Evaluation Disparities , 1987 .

[51]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Response Mode, Framing and Information-processing Effects in Risk Assessment , 1988 .

[52]  R. Lebow,et al.  Beyond Deterrence: Building Better Theory , 1987 .

[53]  Gordon Miller,et al.  Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions , 1990 .

[54]  A. Lamborn Risk and Foreign Policy Choice , 1985 .

[55]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[56]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information , 1985 .

[57]  Richard Smoke,et al.  Deterrence in American Foreign Policy , 1974 .

[58]  J. Knetsch The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .

[59]  Raymond L. Garthoff,et al.  The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon. , 1990 .

[60]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[61]  D. E. Bell,et al.  Decision Making: MARGINAL VALUE AND INTRINSIC RISK AVERSION , 1988 .

[62]  Jack S. Levy,et al.  Preferences, Constraints, and Choices in July 1914 , 1990 .

[63]  A. George Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House , 1956 .

[64]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference. , 1985 .

[65]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Risk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses: An Expected Utility Analysis , 1980 .

[66]  A. George The “Operational Code”: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making , 1969 .

[67]  Richard Ned Lebow Rational Decision-Making: Israel's Security Choices, 1967 , 1982 .

[68]  R. Carey Dominoes and bandwagons: strategic beliefs and Great Power competition in the Eurasian Rimland , 1992 .

[69]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice , 1988, American Political Science Review.