An Experimental Protocol for Benchmarking Robotic Indoor Navigation

Robot navigation is one of the most studied problems in robotics and the key capability for robot autonomy. Navigation techniques have become more and more reliable, but evaluation mainly focused on individual navigation components (i.e., mapping, localization, and planning) using datasets or simulations. The goal of this paper is to define an experimental protocol to evaluate the whole navigation system, deployed in a real environment. To ensure repeatability and reproducibility of experiments, our benchmark protocol provides detailed definitions and controls the environment dynamics. We define standardized environments and introduce the concept of a reference robot to allow comparison between different navigation systems at different experimentation sites. We present applications of our protocol in experiments in two different research groups, showing the usefulness of the benchmark.

[1]  Illah Nourbakhsh,et al.  NaviGates: A Benchmark for Indoor Navigation , 1998 .

[2]  Stanley T. Birchfield,et al.  An inexpensive method for evaluating the localization performance of a mobile robot navigation system , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[3]  Rüdiger Dillmann,et al.  KA 1.10 Benchmarks for Robotics Research , 2004 .

[4]  A. Asuncion,et al.  UCI Machine Learning Repository, University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences , 2007 .

[5]  Lillian Lee,et al.  Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis , 2008, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[6]  James Bennett,et al.  The Netflix Prize , 2007 .

[7]  Luca Iocchi,et al.  A unified benchmark framework for autonomous Mobile robots and Vehicles Motion Algorithms (MoVeMA benchmarks) , 2008 .

[8]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  A comparison of SLAM algorithms based on a graph of relations , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Liqiang Feng,et al.  UMBmark: a benchmark test for measuring odometry errors in mobile robots , 1995, Other Conferences.

[11]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  On the position accuracy of mobile robot localization based on particle filters combined with scan matching , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[14]  Angel P. del Pobil,et al.  Benchmarks in Robotics Research , 2006 .

[15]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  An experimental comparison of localization methods , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[16]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Online generation of kinodynamic trajectories for non-circular omnidirectional robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.