Impact of ride-pooling on the nature of transit network design

Abstract This paper examines the basic design trade-off in six distinctive transit systems, including two state-of-the-art fixed-route systems and four hybrid systems that use ride-pooling as an integrated feeder service. The systems are analyzed using a continuous approximation approach, and the resulting optimal design problem is formulated and solved as a mixed integer program. We find that ride-pooling changes little the fundamental laws inherent in transit design. Specifically, all six systems, despite their seemingly vastly different design features, display the following laws: (1) that the per capita agency cost correlates linearly with the per capita user cost, (2) that both costs are power functions of the demand density with an exponent close to − 1 3 and − 0.4 for agency and user costs, respectively, and (3) that the per capita agency cost is not significantly affected by city size but the user cost is. This finding suggests that ride-pooling may have a rather limited impact on the economy of scale in mass transit systems. However, mixing ride-pooling with fixed-route services does promise modest improvements to the overall system efficiency. It also tilts the balance of trade-off considerably in the user’s favor, at the operator’s expense.

[1]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  A Structured Flexible Transit System for Low-Demand Areas , 2011 .

[2]  G. F. Newell Scheduling, Location, Transportation, and Continuum Mechanics: Some Simple Approximations to Optimization Problems , 1973 .

[3]  Francesc Robusté,et al.  Bus network structure and mobility pattern: A monocentric analytical approach on a grid street layout , 2016 .

[4]  Maged M. Dessouky,et al.  Hybrid scheduling methods for paratransit operations , 2003, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Planning and Operation: Theory, Modeling and Practice , 2007 .

[6]  Federico Malucelli,et al.  Demand Adaptive Systems: Some Proposals on Flexible Transit1 , 1999 .

[7]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Bus network design , 1986 .

[8]  Francesc Robusté,et al.  Competitive transit network design in cities with radial street patterns , 2014 .

[9]  Tao Liu,et al.  Analysis of a new public-transport-service concept: Customized bus in China , 2015 .

[10]  Peng Chen,et al.  Optimal design of demand adaptive paired-line hybrid transit: Case of radial route structure , 2018 .

[11]  Sida Luo,et al.  Paired-Line Hybrid Transit System in a Monocentric City with Exponential Demand Pattern , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[12]  Yu Marco Nie,et al.  Analysis of an idealized system of demand adaptive paired-line hybrid transit , 2017 .

[13]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Continuum Approximation Approach to Bus Network Design under Spatially Heterogeneous Demand , 2014 .

[14]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  Some Issues Relating to the Optimal Design of Bus Routes , 1979 .

[15]  Cristina Pronello,et al.  Emissions of demand responsive services as an alternative to conventional transit systems , 2007 .

[16]  Xiugang Li,et al.  Feeder transit services: Choosing between fixed and demand responsive policy , 2010 .

[17]  Xiugang Li,et al.  A methodology to derive the critical demand density for designing and operating feeder transit services , 2009 .

[18]  Randolph W. Hall,et al.  NETWORK DESIGN FOR A GRID HYBRID TRANSIT SERVICE , 2004 .

[19]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Design and implementation of efficient transit networks: Procedure, case study and validity test , 2011 .

[20]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  A Tabu Search Heuristic for the Static Multi-Vehicle Dial-a-Ride Problem , 2002 .

[21]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Two-phase stochastic program for transit network design under demand uncertainty , 2016 .

[22]  Yu Nie,et al.  Connecting e-hailing to mass transit platform: Analysis of relative spatial position , 2017 .

[23]  David M. Stein,et al.  Scheduling Dial-a-Ride Transportation Systems , 1978 .

[24]  E M Holroyd,et al.  THE OPTIMUM BUS SERVICE: A THEORETICAL MODEL FOR A LARGE UNIFORM URBAN AREA , 1967 .

[25]  Sida Luo,et al.  Paired-line hybrid transit design considering spatial heterogeneity , 2019 .

[26]  Fang Zhao,et al.  Optimization of transit route network, vehicle headways and timetables for large-scale transit networks , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Structure of Competitive Transit Networks , 2009 .

[28]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  The length of tours in zones of different shapes , 1984 .

[29]  Teodor Gabriel Crainic,et al.  Flexible many-to-few + few-to-many = an almost personalized transit system , 2001 .

[30]  H. Mohring Optimization and Scale Economies in Urban Bus Transportation , 1972 .

[31]  Bernard F. Byrne Public transportation line positions and headways for minimum user and system cost in a radial case , 1975 .

[32]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Hybrid route generation heuristic algorithm for the design of transit networks , 1995 .

[33]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Optimal Transit Service atop Ring-radial and Grid Street Networks: A Continuum Approximation Design Method and Comparisons , 2015 .