Personas and decision making in the design process: an ethnographic case study

Personas have become a well-lauded method to aid designers in keeping the needs of the intended user population at the forefront of the design process. However, few studies have ethnographically observed design teams that use personas, and fewer studies have looked specifically at how designers linguistically invoke personas in their decision-making sessions. This discourse analysis of the decision-making sessions of designers at a top tier design firm reveals that although the designers dedicate much time researching, developing, and refining personas, personas themselves make relatively few appearances in the designers' language during decision-making sessions. This study shows that, for persuasive ends, these designers, who are advocates of personas, routinely use other less precise and more designer-centric linguistic mechanisms in lieu of personas. Despite the scarcity of personas in the decision-making sessions, this ethnographic case study also explores the value of personas for this team even when the personas are not explicitly linguistically invoked.

[1]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Rapid Contextual Design: A How-To Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design , 2004, UBIQ.

[2]  Mhairi Mackenzie,et al.  The Practice and the Theory , 2005 .

[3]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal Principles of Design , 2003 .

[4]  Bill Sullivan,et al.  THE INMATES ARE RUNNING THE ASYLUM , 2000 .

[5]  Mattias Arvola,et al.  Personas in action: ethnography in an interaction design team , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[6]  Adrienne Massanari,et al.  Designing for imaginary friends: information architecture, personas and the politics of user-centered design , 2010, New Media Soc..

[7]  Nalini Kotamraju,et al.  Data-driven persona development , 2008, CHI.

[8]  Tomasz Miaskiewicz,et al.  A Preliminary Examination of Using Personas to Enhance User-Centered Design , 2009, AMCIS.

[9]  Iftikhar Ahmed,et al.  Making personas memorable , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  S. Reeves,et al.  Discourse Analysis , 2018, The Study of Language.

[11]  Kim Goodwin,et al.  Designing for the Digital Age: How to Create Human-Centered Products and Services , 2009 .

[12]  Kari Rönkkö,et al.  An Empirical Study Demonstrating How Different Design Constraints, Project Organization and Contexts Limited the Utility of Personas , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[14]  Erin Friess,et al.  Designing From Data: Rhetorical Appeals in Support of Design Decisions , 2010 .

[15]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement , 2002 .

[16]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas: practice and theory , 2003, DUX '03.

[17]  John D. Gould,et al.  Human factors challenges in creating a principal support office system—the speech filing system approach , 1983, TOIS.

[18]  J. R. Landis,et al.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.

[19]  Chris Chapman,et al.  The Personas' New Clothes: Methodological and Practical Arguments against a Popular Method , 2006 .