A value case methodology to enable a transition towards generative health management: A case study from The Netherlands

Purpose – Health is a main resource for human functioning. Embedding generative health management within organisations, therefore, is useful for health and productivity reasons. Generative health management requires a change in the thinking and actions of all stakeholders, and should be regarded as a system transition that may be supported by a value case. In this study, a value case methodology is described and piloted. The aim was to investigate the efficacy of the value case methodology for generative health management within organisations. Design/methodology/approach – This paper takes the form of a case study, in which the interactive value case methodology is piloted within a research foundation in The Netherlands. Findings – The different perspectives from the internal stakeholders on generative health management were made explicit, and revealed a strong relation between organisational development and health. The interactive value-case methodology has initiated a process in which stakeholders jointly defined the full value of generative health management. During that process, some stakeholders developed an active personal commitment towards the transition. Research limitations/implications – The research was only carried out in one case. The value case methodology is potentially also useful for other transitions (long-term complex developments or system innovations). The case study provided a broad view on the relevance of health for all stakeholders within this single case, and contributed to ownership of the transition. Practical implications – A value case presents stakeholders' multi-perspective visions and preferences with regard to health and organisational development. The participative approach opens up ways to an active commitment of relevant stakeholders who are willing to support transitions. Originality/value – The methodology to assess the full value of complex transitions is still of an explorative nature. The value case methodology may offer innovative ways to support transitions in individuals, organisations and society as a whole.

[1]  David Knoke,et al.  Incentives in Collective Action Organizations , 1988 .

[2]  G. Hughes In search of excellence , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[3]  S. Leka,et al.  Policy Approaches to Occupational and Organizational Health , 2014 .

[4]  D. Ofori,et al.  Occupational Safety and Health and Corporate Social Responsibility in Africa: Repositioning Corporate Responsibility Towards National Development , 2012 .

[5]  Maria E. Fernandez,et al.  Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach , 2006 .

[6]  N.H.G. Baken,et al.  The value (driven) web , 2010 .

[7]  Freek Bomhof,et al.  ICT Enabling More Energy Efficient Processes, Including e-Invoicing as a Case , 2012 .

[8]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[9]  Rachelle Buchbinder,et al.  A systematic grounded approach to the development of complex interventions: the Australian WorkHealth Program--arthritis as a case study. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[10]  Frank Pot,et al.  The Business Value of Health Management , 2004 .

[11]  C. M. van Weelden,et al.  The value of a smart meter , 2011 .

[12]  Ulf Johanson,et al.  Work health and management control , 2007 .

[13]  Arnold B. Bakker,et al.  Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement , 2010 .

[14]  R. Weehuizen Mental capital : the economic significance of mental health , 2008 .

[15]  Magnus Gustafsson,et al.  Competitive advantage through value-based health care: The case of Metso Corporation , 2010 .

[16]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Value of digital information networks: a holonic framework , 2011 .

[17]  S. Aldana Financial Impact of Health Promotion Programs: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature , 2001, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[18]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  How should we define health? , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Daniel Corbett Excellence in Canada: Healthy Organizations – Achieve Results by Acting Responsibly , 2004 .

[20]  G Rose,et al.  Sick individuals and sick populations. , 1985, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  J. Verbeek,et al.  A systematic review of occupational safety and health business cases. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[22]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Interventions to promote well-being at work , 2010 .

[23]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[24]  G. Zwetsloot,et al.  Towards a strategic business case for health management , 2007 .

[25]  M. Kivimäki,et al.  Do obesity and sleep problems cluster in the workplace? A multivariate, multilevel study. , 2013, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[26]  Tom Cox,et al.  Policy-level interventions and work-related psychosocial risk management in the European Union , 2010 .

[27]  C. Otto Scharmer,et al.  Theory U: Leading from the Future as it Emerges , 2007 .

[28]  D. Edington,et al.  The total value of health: a review of literature , 2008 .

[29]  Organizational health: The ultimate competitive advantage , 2011 .

[30]  Albert Bandura,et al.  The Primacy of Self-Regulation in Health Promotion , 2005 .

[31]  Gerard I.J.M. Zwetsloot,et al.  The organizational benefits of investing in workplace health , 2010 .

[32]  M. Mckee,et al.  Low fruit and vegetable consumption. , 2004 .