Boundary crossing in epithelial wound healing

The processes of wound healing and collective cell migration have been studied for decades. Intensive research has been devoted to understanding the mechanisms involved in wound healing, but the role of cell-substrate interactions is still not thoroughly understood. Here we probe the role of cell-substrate interactions by examining in vitro the healing of monolayers of human corneal epithelial (HCE) cells cultured on artificial extracellular matrix (aECM) proteins. We find that the rate of wound healing is dependent on the concentration of fibronectin-derived (RGD) cell-adhesion ligands in the aECM substrate. The wound closure rate varies nearly sixfold on the substrates examined, despite the fact that the rates of migration and proliferation of individual cells show little sensitivity to the RGD concentration (which varies 40-fold). To explain this apparent contradiction, we study collective migration by means of a dynamic Monte Carlo simulation. The cells in the simulation spread, retract, and proliferate with probabilities obtained from a simple phenomenological model. The results indicate that the overall wound closure rate is determined primarily by the rate at which cells cross the boundary between the aECM protein and the matrix deposited under the cell sheet.

[1]  P J Sammak,et al.  How do injured cells communicate with the surviving cell monolayer? , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[2]  David A Tirrell,et al.  Physical properties of artificial extracellular matrix protein films prepared by isocyanate crosslinking. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[3]  Paul Martin,et al.  Actin cables and epidermal movement in embryonic wound healing , 1992, Nature.

[4]  A Singh,et al.  Corneal epithelial wound healing. , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  M. D. Evans,et al.  Multiple attachment mechanisms of corneal epithelial cells to a polymer--cells can attach in the absence of exogenous adhesion proteins through a mechanism that requires microtubules. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[6]  Kwang-Hwi Cho,et al.  BIOPHYSICS AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY , 2009 .

[7]  R. Clark.  Fibronectin matrix deposition and fibronectin receptor expression in healing and normal skin. , 1990, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[8]  W. H. Weinberg,et al.  Theoretical foundations of dynamical Monte Carlo simulations , 1991 .

[9]  A S Hoffman,et al.  Correlation between corneal epithelial cell outgrowth and monoclonal antibody binding to the cell binding domain of adsorbed fibronectin. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  David A Tirrell,et al.  Endothelial cell adhesion to the fibronectin CS5 domain in artificial extracellular matrix proteins. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[11]  D. L. Patton,et al.  Time-lapse videomicroscopic study of in vitro wound closure in rabbit corneal cells. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Direct measurement of the lamellipodial protrusive force in a migrating cell , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  H Green,et al.  The initiation of cell division in a contact-inhibited mammalian cell line. , 1965, Journal of cellular physiology.

[14]  C. Kahn,et al.  Human corneal epithelial primary cultures and cell lines with extended life span: in vitro model for ocular studies. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  Rizwan U. Farooqui,et al.  Multiple rows of cells behind an epithelial wound edge extend cryptic lamellipodia to collectively drive cell-sheet movement , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[16]  David A Tirrell,et al.  Comparative cell response to artificial extracellular matrix proteins containing the RGD and CS5 cell-binding domains. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[17]  Niels Galjart,et al.  Differential effects of matrix and growth factors on endothelial and fibroblast motility: Application of a modified cell migration assay , 2006, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[18]  P. Forscher,et al.  A novel cytoskeletal structure involved in purse string wound closure and cell polarity maintenance , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  Reinhard Lipowsky,et al.  Adhesion of membranes via receptor-ligand complexes: Domain formation, binding cooperativity, and active processes , 2009, 0906.1675.

[20]  Julie C. Liu,et al.  Cell response to RGD density in cross-linked artificial extracellular matrix protein films. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[21]  G. I. Bell.  Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[22]  M. D. Evans,et al.  Polymer surface chemistry and a novel attachment mechanism in corneal epithelial cells. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Brownian motion of nucleated cell envelopes impedes adhesion. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[24]  P. Chavrier,et al.  Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Stanislav Y Shvartsman,et al.  Role of boundary conditions in an experimental model of epithelial wound healing. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[26]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[27]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Kinetic Model for Integrin-mediated Adhesion Release During Cell Migration , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  W. H. Weinberg,et al.  DYNAMIC MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS OF SURFACE-RATE PROCESSES , 1992 .

[29]  H. Sheardown,et al.  Interactions of corneal epithelial cells and surfaces modified with cell adhesion peptide combinations , 2002, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[30]  J. Klarlund,et al.  Wounding Induces Motility in Sheets of Corneal Epithelial Cells through Loss of Spatial Constraints , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  T. Chikama,et al.  Cell–matrix and cell–cell interactions during corneal epithelial wound healing , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[32]  M. Stepp.  Corneal integrins and their functions. , 2006, Experimental eye research.

[33]  David A. Tirrell,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Artificial Protein Matrices Engineered for Control of Cell and Tissue Behavior , 2003 .

[34]  P. Bongrand,et al.  Do membrane undulations help cells probe the world? , 2009, Trends in cell biology.