Environmental Assessment of Two Pathways Towards the Use of Biofuels in Shipping

The goal of this study is to evaluate the life cycle performance of two alternative pathways to biofuels in the shipping industry: the ‘diesel route’ and the ‘gas route’. The diesel route comprises of a shift from heavy fuel oil to marine gas oil and then a gradual shift to biodiesel, whereas the gas route comprises of a shift to liquefied natural gas and then a gradual shift to liquefied biogas. The two routes are assessed in a case study for the ferry traffic between the Swedish mainland and the island Gotland. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to evaluate the environmental performance with the functional unit chosen to be one year of ro-pax ferry service, including both passenger and goods transportation. The gas route is indicated to have better overall environmental performance than the diesel route. Furthermore, use of biofuels is illustrated as one possible measure to decrease the global warming impact from shipping, but to the expense of greater environmental impact for some other impact categories. As an example, the global warming potential (GWP100) was shown to decrease with the use of biofuels in this study, while the eutrophication potential and the primary energy use increased.

[1]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[2]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Spatially Explicit Characterization of Acidifying and Eutrophying Air Pollution in Life‐Cycle Assessment , 2000 .

[3]  Ian McCallum,et al.  Optimal location of lignocellulosic ethanol refineries with polygeneration in Sweden. , 2010 .

[4]  Life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil, rape methyl ester and ethanol as fuels , 2004 .

[5]  Sven Bernesson,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF RAPESEED OIL, RAPE METHYL ESTER AND ETHANOL AS FUELS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN LARGE- AND SMALL- SCALE PRODUCTION , 2004 .

[6]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part II: Land use scenarios , 2010 .

[7]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Hybrid life-cycle assessment of natural gas based fuel chains for transportation. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  B. Ciuffo,et al.  Designing a climate change policy for the international maritime transport sector: Market-based measures and technological options for global and regional policy actions , 2011 .

[9]  Md. Nurun Nabi,et al.  Experimental investigation of engine emissions with marine gas oil-oxygenate blends. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Prasant Kumar Rout,et al.  Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review , 2010 .

[11]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  Biomass for heat or as transportation fuel? A comparison between two model-based studies , 2007 .

[12]  Mirjana Golušin,et al.  Policy and promotion of sustainable inland waterway transport in Europe ― Danube River , 2011 .

[13]  Karin Andersson,et al.  Environmental Trade-Offs in Nitrogen Oxide Removal from Ship Engine Exhausts , 2011 .

[14]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[15]  Toshimasa Kagajo,et al.  Life cycle CO2 analysis of LNG and city gas , 2001 .

[16]  Frederick W. Williams,et al.  Incompatibility of Fischer−Tropsch Diesel with Petroleum and Soybean Biodiesel Blends , 2009 .

[17]  V. Eyring,et al.  Climate impact of biofuels in shipping: global model studies of the aerosol indirect effect. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  G. Forsberg Biomass energy transport: Analysis of bioenergy transport chains using life cycle inventory method , 2000 .

[19]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  The role of biofuels for transportation in CO2 emission reduction scenarios with global versus regional carbon caps , 2009 .

[20]  Eric Johnson,et al.  Goodbye to carbon neutral: Getting biomass footprints right , 2009 .

[21]  Bruno Peuportier,et al.  How to account for CO2 emissions from biomass in an LCA , 2007 .

[22]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Emissions Tradeoffs among Alternative Marine Fuels: Total Fuel Cycle Analysis of Residual Oil, Marine Gas Oil, and Marine Diesel Oil , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[23]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Shipping design for compliance and the performance contingencies for shipping firms , 2013 .

[24]  Tsan-Huang Huang,et al.  Cost-benefit evaluation of using biodiesel as an alternative fuel for fishing boats in Taiwan , 2012 .

[25]  Selma Bengtsson,et al.  A comparative life cycle assessment of marine fuels , 2011 .

[26]  A A Banawan,et al.  Environmental and economical benefits of changing from marine diesel oil to natural-gas fuel for short-voyage high-power passenger ships , 2010 .

[27]  Emily E. Peacock,et al.  Biodegradation and environmental behavior of biodiesel mixtures in the sea: An initial study. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[28]  Calliope Panoutsou,et al.  Biomass supply in EU27 from 2010 to 2030 , 2009 .

[29]  Maria Grahn,et al.  Cost-effective fuel and technology choices in the transportation sector in a future carbon constrained world: results from the Global Energy Transition (GET) model , 2009 .

[30]  G. Karavalakis,et al.  The impact of using biodiesel/marine gas oil blends on exhaust emissions from a stationary diesel engine , 2008, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[31]  M. Berglund,et al.  Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production , 2006 .

[32]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[33]  André Faaij,et al.  Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices , 2006 .

[34]  T. Gustafsson,et al.  Methodology for calculating emissions from ships: 1. Update of emission factors , 2004 .

[35]  H. I. Sarac,et al.  Biodiesel Addition to Standard Diesel Fuels and Marine Fuels Used in a Diesel Engine: Effects on Emission Characteristics and First- and Second-Law Efficiencies† , 2009 .

[36]  James J. Corbett,et al.  Marine Transportation and Energy Use , 2004 .

[37]  E. Lois,et al.  An investigation of using biodiesel/marine diesel blends on the performance of a stationary diesel engine , 2003 .

[38]  V. Eyring,et al.  Second IMO GHG study 2009 , 2009 .

[39]  Yaodong Wang,et al.  The performance and the gaseous emissions of two small marine craft diesel engines fuelled with biodiesel , 2008 .

[40]  R. Sims,et al.  An overview of current industry and RD&D activities , 2008 .

[41]  S. Nygaard,et al.  Microbial growth studies in biodiesel blends. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[42]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Energy Use and Emissions from Marine Vessels: A Total Fuel Life Cycle Approach , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[43]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[44]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[45]  T Wiesenthal,et al.  How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment , 2006 .

[46]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion , 2011 .

[47]  F. Jiménez Espadafor,et al.  The viability of pure vegetable oil as an alternative fuel for large ships , 2009 .

[48]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part I: Land productivity potentials. , 2010 .

[49]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions , 2006 .

[50]  Thea Whitman,et al.  Systematic under- and overestimation of GHG reductions in renewable biomass systems , 2011 .

[51]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes , 2011 .

[52]  Ben Fieldhouse,et al.  AQUEOUS SOLUBILITY, DISPERSIBILITY AND TOXICITY OF BIODIESELS , 2008 .

[53]  Other MARPOL 73/78: consolidated edition, 1991: Articles, Protocols, Annexes, Unified Interpretations of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto , 1991 .

[54]  Nina Johansson,et al.  Production of liquid biogas, LBG, with cryogenic and conventional upgrading technology - Description of systems and evaluations of energy balances , 2008 .

[55]  Göran Berndes,et al.  The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies , 2003 .

[56]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[57]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  The hitch hiker's guide to LCA : an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application , 2004 .

[58]  H. Schlager,et al.  Operation of marine diesel engines on biogenic fuels: modification of emissions and resulting climate effects. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[59]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The computational structure of life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[60]  Govinda R. Timilsina,et al.  Second-Generation Biofuels: Economics and Policies , 2010 .