Production predicts comprehension: Animacy effects in Mandarin relative clause processing

This article investigates the relationship between production and comprehension of relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese. In a picture description task, we find strong head noun animacy effects on relative clause production despite the fact that Mandarin has head-final relative clauses ([[relative clause] head noun]), so that the animate/inanimate head noun is uttered late. These and other production results have implications for theories of incremental language planning. We then used corpus analyses to investigate the distribution of structure–message pairings in the language that result from these animacy-based production biases. Mandarin is particularly interesting from the language comprehension side, as there is an extensive literature on relative clause comprehension, with conflicting results. A gated sentence completion task reveals comprehenders’ animacy-linked expectations in relative clause interpretation and also shows the substantial amount of syntactic ambiguity in Mandarin relative clauses, owing to their head-final structure. The completion data were reliable predictors of comprehenders’ self-paced reading times, but the distance between syntactically-dependent elements in the sentences was not. We argue that these results argue against accounts of sentence comprehension that posit that some sentence types are inherently more difficult than others. Instead we suggest that sentence types with which comprehenders have little experience are difficult, and we link the results ultimately to producers’ different production choices in different animacy configurations and consequent variation in language patterns that comprehenders experience.

[1]  Gary M. Oppenheim,et al.  Cumulative semantic interference as learning , 2007, Brain and Language.

[2]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Animacy and the Resolution of Temporary Ambiguity in Relative Clause Comprehension in Mandarin , 2010 .

[3]  Elsi Kaiser,et al.  Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing , 2012 .

[4]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.

[5]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  F. Ferreira,et al.  How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .

[7]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Experience and generalization in a connectionist model of Mandarin Chinese relative clause processing , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[8]  Fuyun Wu Factors affecting relative clause processing in Mandarin , 2009 .

[9]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  Text exposure predicts spoken production of complex sentences in 8- and 12-year-old children and adults. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Processing Chinese relative clauses in context , 2013 .

[12]  Agnieszka E. Konopka,et al.  Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal , 2013 .

[13]  E. Gibson The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[14]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  G.H.J. Drieman Differences between written and spoken language: An exploratory study , 1962 .

[16]  E. Gibson,et al.  The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses q , 2013 .

[17]  Ming-Ming Pu,et al.  The Distribution of Relative Clauses in Chinese Discourse , 2007 .

[18]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  A. Meyer Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[20]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Effects of Text Exposure on Spoken Sentence Production , 2014, CogSci.

[21]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[22]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[23]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[24]  Yi-Ching Su,et al.  Asyntactic thematic role assignment by Mandarin aphasics: A test of the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis and the Double Dependency Hypothesis , 2007, Brain and Language.

[25]  Chien-Jer Charles Lin Chinese and English Relative Clauses: Processing Constraints and Typological Consequences , 2011 .

[26]  S. Vasishth,et al.  Processing Chinese Relative Clauses: Evidence for the Subject-Relative Advantage , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Susan Dunlap,et al.  Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[29]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Subject Preference in the Processingof Relative Clauses in Chinese , 2006 .

[30]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses , 2012, Journal of memory and language.

[31]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Sentence integration processes: An ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses , 2010, Brain and Language.

[32]  J. Hawkins Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[33]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[34]  Kathy Y. van Nice,et al.  Animacy effects in language production: From mental model to formulator , 2003 .

[35]  Julie A. Van Dyke,et al.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[36]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Yaling Hsiao,et al.  Agent-patient similarity affects sentence structure in language production: evidence from subject omissions in Mandarin , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[38]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Chapter 7 – Sentence Comprehension , 1995 .

[39]  Chris Shei,et al.  Understanding the Chinese Language A Comprehensive Linguistic Introduction , 2014 .

[40]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[41]  Franklin Chang,et al.  A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses , 2011 .

[42]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Direct Evidence of Memory Retrieval as a Source of Difficulty in Non-Local Dependencies in Language , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Frank Keller,et al.  Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.

[44]  Stefan L. Frank,et al.  Surprisal-based comparison between a symbolic and a connectionist model of sentence processing , 2009 .

[45]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing , 2015 .

[46]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[47]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[48]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Language knowledge and event knowledge in language use , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  Koenraad De Smedt,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF INCREMENTAL GRAMMATICAL ENCODING , 2006 .

[50]  William O’Grady,et al.  Relative clauses Processing and acquisition * , 2011 .

[51]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[52]  A. Andrews,et al.  Relative Clauses , 2019, The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek.

[53]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.

[54]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  It’s not Just the “Heavy NP”: Relative Phrase Length Modulates the Production of Heavy-NP Shift , 2011, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[55]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Processing relative clauses in Chinese , 2003, Cognition.

[56]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[57]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies , 2006, Cognition.

[58]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .

[59]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[60]  P. Gordon,et al.  Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .

[61]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[62]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  How language production shapes language form and comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychol..

[63]  趙 元任,et al.  A grammar of spoken Chinese = 中國話的文法 , 1968 .

[64]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[65]  Mark C. Smith,et al.  Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  N. Clark,et al.  Direct Evidence , 1934 .

[67]  Tony McEnery,et al.  Passive constructions in English and Chinese: A corpus-based contrastive study . , 2005 .

[68]  Evan Kidd,et al.  The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology and function , 2011 .

[69]  Marianne Hundt,et al.  Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English , 2004, English Language and Linguistics.

[70]  F. Ferreira Choice of Passive Voice is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy , 1994 .

[71]  Clinton L Johns,et al.  Identifying the role of phonology in sentence-level reading. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[72]  Victor S Ferreira,et al.  Proactive interference effects on sentence production , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[73]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[74]  K. Bock An Effect of the Accessibility of Word Forms on Sentence Structures , 1987 .

[75]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Optional that indicates production difficulty: evidence from disfluencies , 2005, DiSS.

[76]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The use of "that" in the Production and Comprehension of Object Relative Clauses , 2003 .

[77]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Syntactic Complexity Effects in Sentence Production , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[79]  M. Pickering,et al.  Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence production: Evidence from Japanese , 2011 .

[80]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[81]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[82]  Gary M. Oppenheim,et al.  The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production , 2010, Cognition.