Production predicts comprehension: Animacy effects in Mandarin relative clause processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Gary M. Oppenheim,et al. Cumulative semantic interference as learning , 2007, Brain and Language.
[2] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Animacy and the Resolution of Temporary Ambiguity in Relative Clause Comprehension in Mandarin , 2010 .
[3] Elsi Kaiser,et al. Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing , 2012 .
[4] Adrian Staub,et al. Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.
[5] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[6] F. Ferreira,et al. How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .
[7] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Experience and generalization in a connectionist model of Mandarin Chinese relative clause processing , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[8] Fuyun Wu. Factors affecting relative clause processing in Mandarin , 2009 .
[9] Gerard Kempen,et al. An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..
[10] Maryellen C MacDonald,et al. Text exposure predicts spoken production of complex sentences in 8- and 12-year-old children and adults. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[11] Edward Gibson,et al. Processing Chinese relative clauses in context , 2013 .
[12] Agnieszka E. Konopka,et al. Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal , 2013 .
[13] E. Gibson. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .
[14] P. Gordon,et al. Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[15] G.H.J. Drieman. Differences between written and spoken language: An exploratory study , 1962 .
[16] E. Gibson,et al. The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses q , 2013 .
[17] Ming-Ming Pu,et al. The Distribution of Relative Clauses in Chinese Discourse , 2007 .
[18] B. McElree,et al. Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.
[19] A. Meyer. Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .
[20] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Effects of Text Exposure on Spoken Sentence Production , 2014, CogSci.
[21] J. K. Bock,et al. Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.
[22] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .
[23] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[24] Yi-Ching Su,et al. Asyntactic thematic role assignment by Mandarin aphasics: A test of the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis and the Double Dependency Hypothesis , 2007, Brain and Language.
[25] Chien-Jer Charles Lin. Chinese and English Relative Clauses: Processing Constraints and Typological Consequences , 2011 .
[26] S. Vasishth,et al. Processing Chinese Relative Clauses: Evidence for the Subject-Relative Advantage , 2013, PloS one.
[27] Susan Dunlap,et al. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses. , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[28] Douglas Roland,et al. Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[29] Thomas G. Bever,et al. Subject Preference in the Processingof Relative Clauses in Chinese , 2006 .
[30] Evelina Fedorenko,et al. The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses , 2012, Journal of memory and language.
[31] Charles A. Perfetti,et al. Sentence integration processes: An ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses , 2010, Brain and Language.
[32] J. Hawkins. Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .
[33] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[34] Kathy Y. van Nice,et al. Animacy effects in language production: From mental model to formulator , 2003 .
[35] Julie A. Van Dyke,et al. Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[36] Silvia P. Gennari,et al. Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.
[37] Yaling Hsiao,et al. Agent-patient similarity affects sentence structure in language production: evidence from subject omissions in Mandarin , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[38] John C. Trueswell,et al. Chapter 7 – Sentence Comprehension , 1995 .
[39] Chris Shei,et al. Understanding the Chinese Language A Comprehensive Linguistic Introduction , 2014 .
[40] Silvia P. Gennari,et al. Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[41] Franklin Chang,et al. A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses , 2011 .
[42] Edward Gibson,et al. Direct Evidence of Memory Retrieval as a Source of Difficulty in Non-Local Dependencies in Language , 2013, Cogn. Sci..
[43] Frank Keller,et al. Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.
[44] Stefan L. Frank,et al. Surprisal-based comparison between a symbolic and a connectionist model of sentence processing , 2009 .
[45] Shravan Vasishth,et al. The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing , 2015 .
[46] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[47] W. Levelt,et al. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .
[48] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Language knowledge and event knowledge in language use , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.
[49] Koenraad De Smedt,et al. COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF INCREMENTAL GRAMMATICAL ENCODING , 2006 .
[50] William O’Grady,et al. Relative clauses Processing and acquisition * , 2011 .
[51] John A. Hawkins,et al. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .
[52] A. Andrews,et al. Relative Clauses , 2019, The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek.
[53] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.
[54] Maryellen C MacDonald,et al. It’s not Just the “Heavy NP”: Relative Phrase Length Modulates the Production of Heavy-NP Shift , 2011, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[55] Edward Gibson,et al. Processing relative clauses in Chinese , 2003, Cognition.
[56] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[57] M. Coltheart,et al. Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies , 2006, Cognition.
[58] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .
[59] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[60] P. Gordon,et al. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .
[61] Edward Gibson,et al. Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[62] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. How language production shapes language form and comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychol..
[63] 趙 元任,et al. A grammar of spoken Chinese = 中國話的文法 , 1968 .
[64] John Hale,et al. A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.
[65] Mark C. Smith,et al. Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[66] N. Clark,et al. Direct Evidence , 1934 .
[67] Tony McEnery,et al. Passive constructions in English and Chinese: A corpus-based contrastive study . , 2005 .
[68] Evan Kidd,et al. The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology and function , 2011 .
[69] Marianne Hundt,et al. Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English , 2004, English Language and Linguistics.
[70] F. Ferreira. Choice of Passive Voice is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy , 1994 .
[71] Clinton L Johns,et al. Identifying the role of phonology in sentence-level reading. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.
[72] Victor S Ferreira,et al. Proactive interference effects on sentence production , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[73] M. Just,et al. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .
[74] K. Bock. An Effect of the Accessibility of Word Forms on Sentence Structures , 1987 .
[75] T. Florian Jaeger,et al. Optional that indicates production difficulty: evidence from disfluencies , 2005, DiSS.
[76] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The use of "that" in the Production and Comprehension of Object Relative Clauses , 2003 .
[77] W. Glaser,et al. The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[78] Evelina Fedorenko,et al. Syntactic Complexity Effects in Sentence Production , 2015, Cogn. Sci..
[79] M. Pickering,et al. Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence production: Evidence from Japanese , 2011 .
[80] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[81] Richard L. Lewis,et al. An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[82] Gary M. Oppenheim,et al. The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production , 2010, Cognition.