Dose-Dependent Effects of L-Arginine on PROP Bitterness Intensity and Latency and Characteristics of the Chemical Interaction between PROP and L-Arginine

Genetic variation in the ability to taste the bitterness of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is a complex trait that has been used to predict food preferences and eating habits. PROP tasting is primarily controlled by polymorphisms in the TAS2R38 gene. However, a variety of factors are known to modify the phenotype. Principle among them is the salivary protein Ps-1 belonging to the basic proline-rich protein family (bPRP). Recently, we showed that oral supplementation with Ps-1 as well as its related free amino acids (L-Arg and L-Lys) enhances PROP bitterness perception, especially for PROP non-tasters who have low salivary levels of Ps-1. Here, we show that salivary L-Arg levels are higher in PROP super-tasters compared to medium tasters and non-tasters, and that oral supplementation with free L-Arg enhances PROP bitterness intensity as well as reduces bitterness latency in a dose-dependent manner, particularly in individuals with low salivary levels of both free L-Arg and Ps-1 protein. Supplementation with L-Arg also enhanced the bitterness of caffeine. We also used 1H-NMR spectroscopy and quantum-mechanical calculations carried out by Density Functional Theory (DFT) to characterize the chemical interaction between free L-Arg and the PROP molecule. Results showed that the –NH2 terminal group of the L-ArgH+ side chain interacts with the carbonyl or thiocarbonyl groups of PROP by forming two hydrogen bonds with the resulting charged adduct. The formation of this PROP•ArgH+ hydrogen-bonded adduct could enhance bitterness intensity by increasing the solubility of PROP in saliva and its availability to receptor sites. Our data suggest that L-Arg could act as a ‘carrier’ of various bitter molecules in saliva.

[1]  P. Gasparini,et al.  Coarse-Grained/Molecular Mechanics of the TAS2R38 Bitter Taste Receptor: Experimentally-Validated Detailed Structural Prediction of Agonist Binding , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  S. V. Lipchock,et al.  Relationship between bitter-taste receptor genotype and solid medication formulation usage among young children: a retrospective analysis. , 2012, Clinical therapeutics.

[3]  Paolo Gasparini,et al.  Insights into the Binding of Phenyltiocarbamide (PTC) Agonist to Its Target Human TAS2R38 Bitter Receptor , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  V. Duffy,et al.  Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste. , 2000, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[5]  Q. Cui,et al.  Does arginine remain protonated in the lipid membrane? Insights from microscopic pKa calculations. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[6]  M. D'Archivio,et al.  Polyphenols, dietary sources and bioavailability. , 2007, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[7]  M. Drake,et al.  Bitter taste inhibiting agents for whey protein hydrolysate and whey protein hydrolysate beverages. , 2012, Journal of food science.

[8]  P. Gasparini,et al.  Genetic Variation in Taste Sensitivity to 6‐n‐Propylthiouracil and Its Relationship to Taste Perception and Food Selection , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  E. Williams,et al.  Structures of protonated arginine dimer and bradykinin investigated by density functional theory: further support for stable gas-phase salt bridges. , 2000, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[10]  B. Tepper,et al.  Influence of PROP taster status and maternal variables on energy intake and body weight of pre-adolescents , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[11]  B. Tepper,et al.  Fat Perception is Related to PROP Taster Status , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  A. L. Fox The Relationship between Chemical Constitution and Taste. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  V. Lippolis,et al.  An experimental and theoretical investigation on hypervalent organoselenium(II) halides: Case study of [2-(Et2NCH2)C6H4]SeX (X = Cl, Br, I) , 2011 .

[14]  G. Schaftenaar,et al.  Molden: a pre- and post-processing program for molecular and electronic structures* , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[15]  Stephen D. Roper,et al.  The cell biology of taste , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  M. Behrens,et al.  The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. , 2010, Chemical senses.

[17]  J. Hayes,et al.  Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation. , 2007, Chemical senses.

[18]  F. Rousset genepop’007: a complete re‐implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux , 2008, Molecular ecology resources.

[19]  R. Crnjar,et al.  The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), is associated with fungiform papilla density, whereas PROP bitterness is mostly due to TAS2R38 in an ethnically-mixed population , 2015, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  R. Matsuo,et al.  Role of saliva in the maintenance of taste sensitivity. , 2000, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[21]  B. Tepper,et al.  Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans. , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[22]  J. Slack,et al.  The Molecular Basis of Individual Differences in Phenylthiocarbamide and Propylthiouracil Bitterness Perception , 2005, Current Biology.

[23]  Kristin Scott Taste Recognition: Food for Thought , 2005, Neuron.

[24]  A. Spielman,et al.  Interaction of Saliva and Taste , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[25]  Gary J. Pickering,et al.  Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[26]  R. Crnjar,et al.  Marked Increase in PROP Taste Responsiveness Following Oral Supplementation with Selected Salivary Proteins or Their Related Free Amino Acids , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Carlo Petrini,et al.  Informed consent in experimentation involving mentally impaired persons: ethical issues. , 2010, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[28]  B. Martin,et al.  Efficacy of exogenous oral zinc in treatment of patients with carbonic anhydrase VI deficiency. , 1999, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[29]  F. Duke,et al.  Age modifies the genotype-phenotype relationship for the bitter receptor TAS2R38 , 2010, BMC Genetics.

[30]  R. Vitorino,et al.  Reactivity of human salivary proteins families toward food polyphenols. , 2011, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[31]  C. Dinnella,et al.  Saliva characteristics and individual sensitivity to phenolic astringent stimuli. , 2009, Chemical senses.

[32]  Vincenzo Barone,et al.  Exchange functionals with improved long-range behavior and adiabatic connection methods without adjustable parameters: The mPW and mPW1PW models , 1998 .

[33]  C. Dinnella,et al.  Temporary modification of salivary protein profile and individual responses to repeated phenolic astringent stimuli. , 2010, Chemical senses.

[34]  Z. Kutalik,et al.  Sensitivity of Genome-Wide-Association Signals to Phenotyping Strategy: The PROP-TAS2R38 Taste Association as a Benchmark , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  V. Lippolis,et al.  Adducts of S/Se Donors with Dihalogens as a Source of Information for Categorizing the Halogen Bonding , 2012 .

[36]  J. Tomasi,et al.  Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[37]  B. Tepper,et al.  Energy intake and diet selection during buffet consumption in women classified by the 6-n-propylthiouracil bitter taste phenotype. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[38]  J. Prescott,et al.  Genetic variation in taste sensitivity. , 2004 .

[39]  T. Uchida,et al.  Screening of bitterness-suppressing agents for quinine: the use of molecularly imprinted polymers. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[40]  S. Cabras,et al.  The Gustin (CA6) Gene Polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), as a Mechanistic Link between PROP Tasting and Fungiform Taste Papilla Density and Maintenance , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  John E. Hayes,et al.  Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[42]  H. Sakagami,et al.  Diurnal changes in salivary amino acid concentrations. , 2010, In vivo.

[43]  B. Tepper,et al.  Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. , 2008, Annual review of nutrition.

[44]  P. Gasparini,et al.  Variation in the Bitter‐taste Receptor Gene TAS2R38, and Adiposity in a Genetically Isolated Population in Southern Italy , 2008, Obesity.

[45]  R. Pangborn,et al.  COMPARISON OF TIME‐INTENSITY WITH CATEGORY SCALING OF BITTERNESS OF ISO‐α‐ACIDS IN MODEL SYSTEMS AND IN BEER* , 1983 .

[46]  Soyoung Shin,et al.  Simultaneous bioanalysis of L-arginine, L-citrulline, and dimethylarginines by LC-MS/MS. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[47]  B. Tepper,et al.  Greater energy intake from a buffet meal in lean, young women is associated with the 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) non-taster phenotype , 2011, Appetite.

[48]  C. Holloman,et al.  Relationships of PROP Taste Phenotype, Taste Receptor Genotype, and Oral Nicotine Replacement Use. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[49]  B. Tepper,et al.  Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children , 2002, Appetite.

[50]  Mark Leppert,et al.  Positional Cloning of the Human Quantitative Trait Locus Underlying Taste Sensitivity to Phenylthiocarbamide , 2003, Science.

[51]  A. K. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Cyclic changes in salivary lactate dehydrogenase, peroxidase and leucine aminopeptidase during menstrual cycle. , 1989, Indian journal of experimental biology.

[52]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[53]  Beverly J. Tepper,et al.  Genetic Sensitivity to the Bitter Taste of 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) and Its Association with Physiological Mechanisms Controlling Body Mass Index (BMI) , 2014, Nutrients.

[54]  K. Taira,et al.  Electron correlation and basis set effects on strong hydrogen bond behavior: a case study of the hydrogen difluoride anion , 2001 .

[55]  Z. Bujas,et al.  Individual gustatory reaction times to various groups of chemicals that provoke basic taste qualities , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  M. Mann,et al.  Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative , 2005, Nature chemical biology.

[57]  N. J. Baxter,et al.  Tannin interactions with a full‐length human salivary proline‐rich protein display a stronger affinity than with single proline‐rich repeats , 1996, FEBS letters.

[58]  B. Tepper,et al.  PROP Taster Status Is Related to Fat Perception and Preference a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[59]  B. Green,et al.  Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties , 1993 .

[60]  V. Lippolis,et al.  Syntheses, solid-state structures, solution behavior of hypervalent organobismuth(III) compounds [2-(Et2NCH2)C6H4]nBiX3−n and DFT characterization of [2-(Me2NCH2)C6H4]nBiX3−n [X = Cl, Br, I; n = 1–3] , 2010 .

[61]  C. Christensen,et al.  Assessment of Different Methods for 6-n-Propylthiouracil Status Classification , 2004 .

[62]  E. Egert,et al.  Cocrystals of 6-propyl-2-thiouracil: N-H···O versus N-H···S hydrogen bonds. , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section C, Crystal structure communications.

[63]  A. Stunkard,et al.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. , 1985, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[64]  D. G. Laing,et al.  Rapid quantitative assessment of fungiform papillae density in the human tongue , 2005, Brain Research.

[65]  C. Fanali,et al.  Facts and artifacts in proteomics of body fluids. What proteomics of saliva is telling us? , 2008, Journal of separation science.

[66]  Hans W. Horn,et al.  Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets for atoms Li to Kr , 1992 .

[67]  B. Tepper,et al.  Influence of genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), dietary restraint and disinhibition on body mass index in middle-aged women , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[68]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Ab Initio Study Of Hydrogen-Bonded Complexes Of Small Organic Molecules With Water , 1998 .

[69]  A. Bennick Interaction of plant polyphenols with salivary proteins. , 2002, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[70]  John Prescott,et al.  Human hedonic responses to sweetness: Role of taste genetics and anatomy , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[71]  Beverly J. Tepper,et al.  Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[72]  I. André,et al.  Residue-specific pKa determination of lysine and arginine side chains by indirect 15N and 13C NMR spectroscopy: application to apo calmodulin. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[73]  Takahiro Uchida,et al.  The combination effect of L-arginine and NaCl on bitterness suppression of amino acid solutions. , 2004, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[74]  P. Contu,et al.  Polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and the taste bud trophic factor, gustin gene co-operate in modulating PROP taste phenotype , 2011, Physiology & Behavior.

[75]  C. Dinnella,et al.  Individual astringency responsiveness affects the acceptance of phenol-rich foods , 2011, Appetite.

[76]  F. Weinhold,et al.  Natural population analysis , 1985 .

[77]  A. Garau,et al.  Molecular Iodine Stabilization in an Extended N···I–I···N Assembly , 2009 .

[78]  E. Delay,et al.  Sucrose threshold variation during the menstrual cycle , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[79]  H. Aebi,et al.  International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research Internationale Zeitschrift für Vitamin- und Ernährungsforschung Journal international de Vitaminologie et de Nutrition , 1982 .

[80]  E. Glanville,et al.  Taste Perception and the Menstrual Cycle , 1965, Nature.

[81]  Wolfram Koch,et al.  A Chemist's Guide to Density Functional Theory , 2000 .

[82]  C. Fanali,et al.  Trafficking and Postsecretory Events Responsible for the Formation of Secreted Human Salivary Peptides , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[83]  J. Hayes,et al.  Exploring associations between taste perception, oral anatomy and polymorphisms in the carbonic anhydrase (gustin) gene CA6 , 2014, Physiology & Behavior.

[84]  Francis McGlone,et al.  Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[85]  K. Kidd,et al.  Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake. , 2004, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[86]  Jun Tan,et al.  3D Structure Prediction of TAS2R38 Bitter Receptors Bound to Agonists Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[87]  Ann C. Noble,et al.  Physiological factors contributing to the variability of sensory assessments: Relationship between salivary flow rate and temporal perception of gustatory stimuli☆ , 1994 .

[88]  Anan Tongraar,et al.  Correlation effects on the structure and dynamics of the H3O+ hydrate: B3LYP/MM and MP2/MM MD simulations. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[89]  T. Cabras,et al.  Responsiveness to 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Is Associated with Salivary Levels of Two Specific Basic Proline-Rich Proteins in Humans , 2012, PloS one.