Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has been widely adopted. Failure to assess the verbal score in intubated patients and the inability to test brainstem reflexes are shortcomings. We devised a new coma score, the FOUR (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness) score. It consists of four components (eye, motor, brainstem, and respiration), and each component has a maximal score of 4. We prospectively studied the FOUR score in 120 intensive care unit patients and compared it with the GCS score using neuroscience nurses, neurology residents, and neurointensivists. We found that the interrater reliability was excellent with the FOUR score (κw = 0.82) and good to excellent for physician rater pairs. The agreement among raters was similar with the GCS (κw = 0.82). Patients with the lowest GCS score could be further distinguished using the FOUR score. We conclude that the agreement among raters was good to excellent. The FOUR score provides greater neurological detail than the GCS, recognizes a locked‐in syndrome, and is superior to the GCS due to the availability of brainstem reflexes, breathing patterns, and the ability to recognize different stages of herniation. The probability of in‐hospital mortality was higher for the lowest total FOUR score when compared with the lowest total GCS score. Ann Neurol 2005;58:585–593

[1]  Quantification of lethargy in the neuro-ICU , 2003, Neurology.

[2]  J. Haukoos,et al.  Validation of the Simplified Motor Score for the prediction of brain injury outcomes after trauma. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  J. Starmark,et al.  A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  T. Novack,et al.  Assessment of level of consciousness following severe neurological insult. A comparison of the psychometric qualities of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Comprehensive Level of Consciousness Scale. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  G. Mcgwin,et al.  Agreement between prehospital and emergency department glasgow coma scores. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  P. Paris,et al.  Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale when used by emergency physicians and paramedics. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  A. Benzer,et al.  Prediction of non-survival after trauma: Innsbruck Coma Scale , 1991, The Lancet.

[8]  F. Sharbrough,et al.  Prognostic value of myoclonus status in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[9]  R. Bloch,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.

[10]  H. Schouten,et al.  Interobserver agreement in assessment of ocular signs in coma. , 1979, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  A Albert,et al.  Relative prognostic value of best motor response and brain stem reflexes in patients with severe head injury. , 1985, Neurosurgery.

[12]  P. O'Brien,et al.  Measurement of impaired consciousness in the neurological intensive care unit: a new test , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  W. Bamlet,et al.  Further validation of the FOUR score coma scale by intensive care nurses. , 2007, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[14]  A. Holdgate,et al.  Variability in agreement between physicians and nurses when measuring the Glasgow Coma Scale in the emergency department limits its clinical usefulness , 2006, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[15]  R. Knill-Jones,et al.  Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  C. Buechler,et al.  Variation among trauma centers' calculation of Glasgow Coma Scale score: results of a national survey. , 1998, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  J. Rankin.  Cerebral Vascular Accidents in Patients over the Age of 60: II. Prognosis , 1957, Scottish medical journal.

[18]  Amado Alejandro Báez,et al.  Precision and Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale Score among a Cohort of Latin American Prehospital Emergency Care Providers , 2007, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[19]  E. Wijdicks.  Clinical scales for comatose patients: the Glasgow Coma Scale in historical context and the new FOUR Score. , 2006, Reviews in neurological diseases.

[20]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[21]  G. Rowley,et al.  Reliability and accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperienced users , 1991, The Lancet.

[22]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[23]  G. Sternbach,et al.  The Glasgow coma scale. , 2000, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[24]  R. Steele,et al.  A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale score to simplified alternative scores for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[25]  J. Pickard,et al.  Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years. , 2004, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  D. Edwards,et al.  Does modification of the Innsbruck and the Glasgow Coma Scales improve their ability to predict functional outcome? , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[27]  Steven M Green,et al.  Interrater reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the emergency department. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[28]  J. Bonnal,et al.  Interobserver agreement in assessment of motor response and brain stem reflexes. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[29]  A. Ropper,et al.  Lateral displacement of the brain and level of consciousness in patients with an acute hemispheral mass. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.