Geographical Variations in Patterns of DAPT Cessation and Two-Year PCI Outcomes: Insights from the PARIS Registry

BACKGROUND  Data on geographical variations in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation and the impact on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. We sought to evaluate geographical patterns of DAPT cessation and associated outcomes in patients undergoing PCI in the United States versus Europe. METHODS  Analyzing data from the PARIS registry, we studied 3,660 U.S. patients (72.9%) and 1,358 European patients (27.1%) that underwent PCI with stent implantation. DAPT cessation was classified as physician-recommended discontinuation, interruption (< 14 days), or disruption due to bleeding or noncompliance. The primary endpoint was 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. RESULTS  Cardiovascular risk factors were more common in the United States, whereas procedural complexity was greater in Europe. The incidence of 2-year DAPT discontinuation was significantly lower in U.S. versus European patients (30.7% vs. 65.6%; p < 0.001); however, rates of interruption (13.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) and disruption (17.7% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001) were higher. DAPT discontinuation was associated with lower adjusted risk, whereas DAPT disruption was associated with greater risk for 2-year MACE, without interaction by region. After adjustment for baseline characteristics and DAPT cessation, 2-year MACE risk was not statistically different between regions (10.3% for Europe vs. 11.9% for U.S., adjusted hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.01, p = 0.065). CONCLUSION  DAPT cessation patterns, along with clinical and angiographic risk, vary substantially between PCI patients in the U.S. versus Europe. Despite such differences, cardiovascular risk associated with DAPT cessation remains uniform.

[1]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European heart journal.

[2]  S. Pocock,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of DAPT disruption due to non-compliance vs. bleeding after PCI: insights from the PARIS Registry , 2019, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[3]  S. Pocock,et al.  Patterns and associations between DAPT cessation and 2-year clinical outcomes in left main/proximal LAD versus other PCI: Results from the Patterns of Non-Adherence to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Stented Patients (PARIS) registry. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  Laura Mauri,et al.  2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  S. Pocock,et al.  International patterns of dual antiplatelet therapy duration after acute coronary syndromes , 2016, Heart.

[6]  S. Pocock,et al.  Coronary Thrombosis and Major Bleeding After PCI With Drug-Eluting Stents: Risk Scores From PARIS. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  J. Spertus,et al.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2016, JAMA.

[8]  L. Mauri,et al.  Adherence to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review , 2014, Clinical cardiology.

[9]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study , 2013, The Lancet.

[10]  H. White,et al.  Development and validation of a stent thrombosis risk score in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium , 2011, Circulation.

[12]  Subhash Banerjee,et al.  Frequency and risk of noncardiac surgery after drug‐eluting stent implantation , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[13]  David M Cutler,et al.  Thinking outside the pillbox--medication adherence as a priority for health care reform. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Alpert,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007 .

[18]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.

[19]  L. Fleisher,et al.  Coronary artery stenting and non-cardiac surgery--a prospective outcome study. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  I. Iakovou,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. , 2005, JAMA.

[21]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.