The responses of amacrine cells to light and intracellularly applied currents.

1. Intracellular responses to light were recorded from amacrine cells in the retina of the turtle Pseudemys scripta elegans. 2. The recorded responses were identified on the basis of physiological criteria reported previously (Marchiafava, 1976). Amacrine cells produced transient 'on' and 'off' depolarizing responses irrespective of the retinal area illuminated and of wavelength. 3. The transient depolarizing responses increased by enlarging the illuminated circle up to 120 micrometer in radius. Circles covering larger areas, up to 200 micrometer, produced a relative decrease of the response amplitude. Thus, amacrine cells' receptive fields appear as a central 'excitatory' area of about 120 micrometer radius, surrounded by a 'suppressor' area. 4. Amacrine cells' photoresponses were associated with an increase in membrane conductance. The responses to illumination of central or peripheral areas of the receptive field, however, showed different reversal potentials. The responses to peripheral illumination reversed at about 15 mV above resting potential, while the equilibrium potential of the centre‐photoresponses was indicated by extrapolation at about +30 mV. No conductance chance was detectable during steady lights. 5. Repetitive stimulation of the optic nerve invariably reduced amacrine cells' photoresponses, but not those recorded from bipolar cells. It follows then that only ganglion cell photoresponses originating from amacrines' input would be depressed by the nerve stimulation, which thus becomes a reliable test to discriminate whether ganglion cell photoresponses originate from amacrine or bipolar inputs.

[1]  W S Duke-Elder,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF THE RETINA , 1926, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  J. Dowling,et al.  Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  A. Kaneko,et al.  Electrophysiological study of single neurons in the inner nuclear layer of the carp retina. , 1969, Vision research.

[4]  A. Kaneko Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  D. Baylor,et al.  Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  B. Katz,et al.  The effect of prolonged depolarization on synaptic transfer in the stellate ganglion of the squid , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  W. Stell The Morphological Organization of the Vertebrate Retina , 1972 .

[8]  A Kaneko,et al.  Receptive field organization of bipolar and amacrine cells in the goldfish retina , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J Toyoda,et al.  Bipolar-amacrine transmission in the carp retina. , 1973, Vision research.

[11]  P. Marchiafava,et al.  Light‐induced resistance changes in retinal rods and cones of the tiger Salamander , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  D. Copenhagen,et al.  Control of Retinal Sensitivity II. Lateral Interactions at the Outer Plexiform Layer , 1974 .

[13]  A. Richter,et al.  Properties of centre‐hyperpolarizing, red‐sensitive bipolar cells in the turtle retina. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  K. Naka,et al.  Morphological and functional identifications of catfish retinal neurons. III. Functional identification. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  K. Naka,et al.  The amacrine cell , 1976, Vision Research.

[16]  J. Ashmore,et al.  Absolute sensitivity of rod bipolar cells in a dark-adapted retina , 1976, Nature.

[17]  P. Marchiafava,et al.  Influence of efferent retinal fibres on responsiveness of ganglion cells to light , 1976, Nature.

[18]  R. Dacheux,et al.  Synaptic organization and ionic basis of on and off channels in mudpuppy retina. I. Intracellular analysis of chloride-sensitive electrogenic properties of receptors, horizontal cells, bipolar cells, and amacrine cells , 1976, The Journal of general physiology.

[19]  P. Marchiafava Centrifugal actions on amacrine and ganglion cells in the retina of the turtle. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  V. Torre,et al.  Electrical responses of rods in the retina of Bufo marinus , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  Y. Shimoda,et al.  Identification of amacrine and ganglion cells in the carp retina. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  V. Torre,et al.  Self‐facilitation of ganglion cells in the retina of the turtle , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  F S Werblin,et al.  Regenerative amacrine cell depolarization and formation of on‐off ganglion cell response. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.