Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia

Objective: To develop a reliable and valid clinical scale measuring the severity of ataxia. Methods: The authors devised the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and tested it in two trials of 167 and 119 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia. Results: The mean time to administer SARA in patients was 14.2 ± 7.5 minutes (range 5 to 40). Interrater reliability was high, with an intraclass coefficient (ICC) of 0.98. Test-retest reliability was high with an ICC of 0.90. Internal consistency was high as indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.94. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were determined by a single factor. SARA ratings showed a linear relation to global assessments using a visual analogue scale, suggesting linearity of the scale (p < 0.0001, r2 = 0.98). SARA score increased with the disease stage (p < 0.001) and was closely correlated with the Barthel Index (r = −0.80, p < 0.001) and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS-IV) (r = −0.89, p < 0.0001), whereas it had only a weak correlation with disease duration (r = 0.34, p < 0.0002) Conclusions: The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia, making it an appropriate primary outcome measure for clinical trials.

[1]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[2]  S. Attar,et al.  Mitral valve replacement. , 1965, Maryland state medical journal.

[3]  G. Badger,et al.  Quantitative measures of neurological function in chronic neuromuscular diseases and ataxia , 1989, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[4]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Idiopathic cerebellar ataxia of late onset: natural history and MRI morphology. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  Jane S. Paulsen,et al.  Unified Huntington's disease rating scale: Reliability and consistency , 1996, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  M. Hallett,et al.  International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[7]  R. Krüger,et al.  Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: genotype and phenotype in German kindreds , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  T Klockgether,et al.  The natural history of degenerative ataxia: a retrospective study in 466 patients. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Elsdon Storey,et al.  Inter‐rater reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) , 2004, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  Measuring Friedreich ataxia: Interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale , 2005, Neurology.

[11]  Paola Giunti,et al.  Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients , 2006, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.