Influences of Sources of Communication on Adoption of a Communication Technology

This study examined the influence of sources of information on end users’ decision to adopt an innovation. The study used an on-line survey to collect data regarding respondents’ perceptions of structured implementation activities and other sources of influence on their reported adoption of Microsoft Outlook at a large, Midwestern university. The research questions were based on Rogers’ model of the diffusion of innovations, and the work of Fulk, Lewis and Seibold, and Weenig on the influences of information sources on adoption of innovations. Results showed that respondents who were exposed to information from informal channels and structured implementation activities (e.g., informational meetings conducted at the unit level) were significantly different from those who received no information through these channels. Perceptions of quantity or quality of information received through informal and official channels were not significantly correlated with adoption. The results indicate that the implementation of Outlook was not viewed as a major event in the life of the organization, and suggest that diffusion of technological innovations may be different from diffusion on non-technological innovations.

[1]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  The Substitution of Communication Technologies for Organizational Structure in Research and Development , 1990 .

[2]  Rob Kling,et al.  Computerization, Office Routines, and Changes in Clerical Work , 1991, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[3]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Innovation and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[4]  R. Kling,et al.  Book Review: Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1991 .

[5]  J. Mccroskey Scales for the measurement of ethos , 1966 .

[6]  R. Osborn,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Design. Vol. 1: Adapting Organizations to Their Environments. , 1982 .

[7]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Innovation Modification During Intraorganizational Adoption , 1993 .

[8]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Group Decision Support Systems and Group Communication , 1993 .

[9]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Models for innovation diffusion , 1985 .

[10]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .

[11]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[12]  Patrick Dawson,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and the Virtual Workplace: the Social and Political Processes of Change , 2000 .

[13]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1994 .

[14]  Mieneke W. H. Weenig,et al.  Communication Networks in the Diffusion of an Innovation in an Organization1 , 1999 .

[15]  Marshall Scott,et al.  Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[16]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[17]  S. A. Renee Speicher Intraorganizational diffusion of communication technology , 1997 .

[18]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms , 1995 .

[19]  M. Feldman Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations , 1987 .

[20]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Communication during intraorganizational innovation adoption: Predicting users' behavioral coping responses to innovations in organizations , 1996 .

[21]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Network Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1994 .