Multivariate approach to the thermal challenge problem

Abstract This paper presents an engineering approach to the thermal challenge problem defined by Dowding et al. (this issue). This approach to model validation is based on a multivariate validation metric that accounts for model parameter uncertainty and correlation between multiple measurement/prediction differences. The effect of model parameter uncertainty is accounted for through first-order sensitivity analysis for the ensemble/validation tests, and first-order sensitivity analysis and Monte-Carlo analysis for the regulatory prediction. While sensitivity based approaches are less computational expensive than Monte-Carlo approaches, they are less likely to capture the far tail behavior of even mildly nonlinear models. The application of the sensitivity based validation metric provided strong evidence that the tested model was not consistent with the experimental data. The use of a temperature dependent effective conductivity with the linear model resulted in model predictions that were consistent with the data. The correlation structure of the model was used to pool the prediction/measurement differences to evaluate the corresponding cumulative density function (CDF). Both the experimental CDF and the predicted CDFs indicated that the regulatory criterion was not met.

[1]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  Review of code and solution verification procedures for computational simulation , 2005 .

[2]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[3]  Les Hatton,et al.  The T-experiments: errors in scientific software , 1996, Quality of Numerical Software.

[4]  George Trapp,et al.  Using Complex Variables to Estimate Derivatives of Real Functions , 1998, SIAM Rev..

[5]  Matthew F. Barone,et al.  Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: Validation metrics , 2004, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  George S. Fishman,et al.  The statistics of discrete-event simulation , 1968 .

[7]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  AN AUTOMATED METHOD FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING COMPLEX VARIABLES , 2000 .

[8]  J. Tinsley Oden,et al.  THE RELIABILITY OF COMPUTER PREDICTIONS: CAN THEY BE TRUSTED? , 2005 .

[9]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2002 .

[10]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Modelling guidelinesterminology and guiding principles , 2004 .

[11]  Leonard E. Schwer,et al.  An overview of the PTC 60/V&V 10: guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics , 2007, Engineering with Computers.

[12]  Dominique Pelletier,et al.  Adaptivity, Sensitivity, and Uncertainty: Toward Standards of Good Practice in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2003 .

[13]  P. Roache Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions , 2002 .

[14]  Patrick Knupp,et al.  Verification of Computer Codes in Computational Science and Engineering , 2002 .

[15]  Laura Painton Swiler,et al.  Calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis: What's what , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Experimental Methodology for Computational Fluid Dynamics Code Validation , 1998 .

[17]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  General Concepts for Experimental Validation of ASCI Code Applications , 2002 .

[18]  J. Tinsley Oden,et al.  Verification and validation in computational engineering and science: basic concepts , 2004 .

[19]  Thaweepat Buranathiti,et al.  Model validation via uncertainty propagation and data transformations , 2004 .

[20]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Issues in Computational Fluid Dynamics Code Verification and Validation , 1997 .

[21]  Ian H. Leslie,et al.  Statistical Validation of Engineering and Scientific Models: Validation Experiments to Application , 2003 .

[22]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Some Observations on Uncertainties and the Verification and Validation of a Simulation , 2003 .

[23]  Patrick J. Roache,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering , 1998 .

[24]  H. Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[25]  R. G. Hills,et al.  Model Validation: Model Parameter and Measurement Uncertainty , 2006 .

[26]  T. Trucano,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Predictive Capability in Computational Engineering and Physics , 2004 .