Social Privacy in Networked Publics: Teens’ Attitudes, Practices, and Strategies

This paper examines how teens understand privacy in highly public networked environments like Facebook and Twitter. We describe both teens’ practices, their privacy strategies, and the structural conditions in which they are embedded, highlighting the ways in which privacy, as it plays out in everyday life, is related more to agency and the ability to control a social situation than particular properties of information. Finally, we discuss the implications of teens’ practices and strategies, revealing the importance of social norms as a regulatory force.(This paper was presented at Oxford Internet Institute’s “A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society” on September 22, 2011.)

[1]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[2]  Christena E. Nippert-Eng,et al.  Islands of Privacy , 2010 .

[3]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? , 2010, First Monday.

[4]  J. Turow,et al.  How Different are Young Adults from Older Adults When it Comes to Information Privacy Attitudes and Policies? , 2010 .

[5]  Alice E. Marwick,et al.  Youth, Privacy and Reputation (Literature Review) , 2010 .

[6]  D. Boyd.  Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics , 2010 .

[7]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[8]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Information Disclosure: An Illusion of Control Hypothesis , 2009 .

[9]  Alice E. Marwick.  To catch a predator? The MySpace moral panic , 2008, First Monday.

[10]  D. Boyd.  Facebook's Privacy Trainwreck , 2008 .

[11]  D. Boyd.  Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[12]  S. Livingstone.  Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere , 2005 .

[13]  Julie E. Cohen.  DRM and privacy , 2003, CACM.

[14]  M. Lamont,et al.  The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences , 2002 .

[15]  Michael Warner.  Publics and Counterpublics , 2002 .

[16]  Markus G. Kuhn,et al.  Information hiding-a survey , 1999, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  C. W. Morris.  Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism , 1995 .

[18]  J. Reiman,et al.  Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood , 1984 .

[19]  Joseph Gray Jackson,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[20]  E. Goffman.  Behavior in public places : notes on the social organization of gatherings , 1964 .

[21]  Leonard Carmichael,et al.  The Human Condition , 1960 .

[22]  E. M. Hartwell.  Boston , 1906 .

[23]  Kate Shaw,et al.  Facebook Privacy Settings , 2009 .

[24]  Daniel J. Solove,et al.  'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy , 2007 .

[25]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code - version 2.0 , 2006 .

[26]  Gill Valentine,et al.  Public Space and the Culture of Childhood , 2004 .

[27]  Daniel J. Solove.  The Digital Person , 2022 .

[28]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[29]  Nancy Fraser.  Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 2016, Public Space Reader.

[30]  R. Gavison.  Privacy and the Limits of Law , 1980 .